Drone Bans Becoming More Popular - But Are They Appropriate?
The rise of drones as personal toys and recreational hobbies has been met with opposition from government agencies, businesses, organizations, and events. While the first few years of drone usage were relatively lax from a regulation perspective, it's becoming increasingly clear that those interested in flying drones outside of their own personal property will have to abide by a growing list of rules and bans. But are these bans appropriate – and how should users feel about them?
How Drones are Being Handled
The bans and regulations against drones make sense on paper, but many hobbyists are left wondering why everyone is being so strict. Before delving into the morality of these bans, let's take a look at some of the different ways drone usage is being restricted.
1. Republican National Convention: "No Drones Allowed"
At the recent Republican National Convention (RNC) in Cleveland, drones were among the many restrictions in the days leading up to the event. A release stated that the entire city of Cleveland – all 82.47 square miles – is actually a "no drone zone." The RNC also has a FAA flight restriction policy in place, per the US Secret Service's request.
"Any unmanned aircraft–including radio-controlled model aircraft / UAS (unmanned aerial system)–are prohibited in the designated restricted areas," officials explained. "Anyone flying a drone within the designated restricted areas may be subject to civil and criminal charges."
2. Restrictions on School Campuses
Among the biggest opponents of drone usage are schools with large campuses. Drones are becoming increasingly popular over schools and athletic fields, which worries some administrators and officials.
"First off, not all drones are bad, they're intended to be a very positive thing," says Dwayne Folkes, an assistant superintendent in Mississippi. "But we still have to deal with the fact that something could happen from well-meaning operators."
School officials around the country are becoming more proactive, educating people, putting up signage, and clearly communicating what's permissible regarding drones on campuses.
3. Bans Near Wildfires
After a couple of human-operated drones came into close contact with wildfires in Utah last year, state legislators successfully passed rules that prevent these unmanned crafts from going near sites.
The danger is that firefighting aircrafts are very nimble and come in at low altitudes with little warning. Drones – should they intersect the flight path – can cause serious damage. Owners of drones flying in restricted wildfire areas now face penalties of three years in jail and a $275,000 fine.
Are Bans the Solution?
While it's clear that drones pose threats under certain circumstances, many wonder if people and organizations are overreacting. Are bans really the best solution – or should the public become more educated about the risks and rewards?
"There should be means to control malicious use of the technology. A blanket ban is not the answer," says Joseph Antony, a cinematographer who uses drones in many of his projects.
Many propose stricter regulations from organizations. They say that requiring people to get licenses – like any other vehicle – is an appropriate solution for monitoring usage. In fact, the FAA has already recommended licenses, but hasn't gone as far as requiring unique identification numbers for individual drones.
Keep an Eye on the Sky
Drones aren't going anywhere – this much is clear. Drone technology has the potential to offer many benefits to both individuals and organizations. However, something must be done to ensure safety. Drone opponents suggest banning them in heavily populated areas. Drone proponents believe bans should be the last resort.
Regardless of where you stand, this is debate worth keeping an eye on.
