@ flaco148Dude, you got it completely wrong. The 50nm would not only be faster but have more memory per square nanometer because you are able to squeeze more transistor into a given space.
Name
Email
Reason
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
@ flaco148
Dude, you got it completely wrong.
The 50nm would not only be faster but have more memory per square nanometer because you are able to squeeze more transistor into a given space.