Brando offers up 2.4-inch digital photo frame, isn't joking
By Darren Murph 
posted Dec 24th 2007 9:18PM
posted Dec 24th 2007 9:18PM
posted Dec 24th 2007 9:18PM
The percentage of sales people that recommend Samsung HDTVs.
Salespeople are also becoming less likely to recommend LCD sets over plasma sets, which goes against the industry trend.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
What's up with all the extraneous space AROUND the screen? Isn't the whole thing contradicting itself?
The frame is detachable, and is transparant I might mention since that is not visible on the picture.
Good to see we can still make more products that waste energy and resource every day. Keep it up!
oh piffle.
Things I would rather spend $45 on instead of this:
Reducing the national debt
spray painting my car
40 gallons of soda
building a chair out of 45000 pennies
a tank and a half of gas
2 weeks worth of burritos
Hmmm, Burritos, I like the way you think.
Tachikomatic: 45,000 pennies? I'd like to do business with you.....
;-)
Hey if you want to reduce the national debt donate the $45 to Ron Paul's campaign.
What the hell am I doing(this goes to all the people reading this too) go spend time with your family! Nobody gives a shit about a stupid digital picture frame. Everyone should get off their computers and go do something with someone at least on Christmas eve. Peace out and Merry Christmas!
no u
Hackable? I sure wouldn't mind a "HTC Tilt DS"
you think thats small/pointless have a look at this
http://www.pcworld.co.uk:80/martprd/store/pcw_page.jsp?BV_SessionID=@@@@1774518623.1198551047@@@@&BV_EngineID=ccccaddmldggffdcflgceggdhhmdgml.0&page=Product&fm=null&sm=null&tm=null&sku=817555&category_oid=-30329
Nope, the engadget one still wins. The one you linked to can be attached to a keychain at least and is portable. Not only that its also only around $15-20 US, whereas while the engadget one does have a larger screen it also has a fricken 2 inch border. So you it would essentially mean you are carrying around a 6 inch rectangular device that only has a 2.4 in screen.
That's great. Are there really people out there who are buying this? I mean, the 2.4" even is ridiculous, but this one ... But maybe it is just too cheap, for that money people are even buying sh..
http://www.digital-photo-frame-market.info
Post about about a 150 inch screen then a 2.5 inch screen, covering the extremes I see
2.4 even better
But will it play pong!?
Erm, Think I did that wrong.
Each one of my photos is at least 6MB so that means I would have...about 2.5 photos on that thing unless I spend even more money to get a memory card.
Oh...I forgot, the screen is too crap in size to need to worry about resolution so that means I can have 100KB JPEG's so theoretically I could have about 160.
Why don't they just give up and get a proper name.
The only place I see this being is on the vanity of a teenage girl. I'd buy the heart shaped one for my baby sister. She like digital frames but thinks the ones out aren't "cute enough".
Palm fonts?
You think that's ridiculous? I dropped into a Fred Meyer the other day and saw a 1.8" digiphoto frame with a 2" border for $35. Wish I took a picture of it. What a waste of plastic.
Someone linked to an even smaller frame from PCWorld, but it doesn't count. As someone said, it is a keychain. I've seen 1.5" freestanding photo frames at work though, with a huge 4 megabytes of internal memory, I'll get a photo and post it if you like.