Also, the 800x480 resolution sucks. When they come out with ones that have 1024 width resolution (which is the minimum for decent web browsing) or higher, I will probably buy a few.
Umm, if you had the power of the internet at your fingers and you had the compunction to search you would allready know that the eee can run 1024*768.
Go to www.eeeuser.com and *USE* the search button in the forums, you'll be amazed by what can be done to these little things.
I am running XP, 2gig ram, 1024*768, 1000MHZ(eeectl), also internal Touchscreen and HDSPA. It is one of the best laptops i have ever had, I'm glad they finally got rid of the VTECH style interface.
Umm, if you had the power of the internet at your fingers and you had the compunction to search you would allready know that the eee can run 1024*768.
Go to www.eeeuser.com and *USE* the search button in the forums, you'll be amazed by what can be done to these little things.
I am running XP, 2gig ram, 1024*768, 1000MHZ(eeectl), also internal Touchscreen and HDSPA. It is one of the best laptops i have ever had, I'm glad they finally got rid of the VTECH style interface.
I'm a little worried about the 9"ers - The processor looks like it may actually be slower, despite the near-doubling of the clock speed. The screen's a disappointment as well. It may prove difficult to do much with a 1024x800 screen without using virtual desktops. In Linux and Windows both there are plenty of short sighted app developers that define fixed-size option dialogues and all sorts of goodies with 800+ pixel heights.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
I was thinking about picking up one of these, but I will wait for the 9" one. The large black areas around the screen bother me.
Agreed.
Also, the 800x480 resolution sucks. When they come out with ones that have 1024 width resolution (which is the minimum for decent web browsing) or higher, I will probably buy a few.
PS> Dammit, engadget fix your reply button issue!
It seems to be that only the US site has it.
Here's a review of the new XP unit...not much changes though.
http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=543
Umm, if you had the power of the internet at your fingers and you had the compunction to search you would allready know that the eee can run 1024*768.
Go to www.eeeuser.com and *USE* the search button in the forums, you'll be amazed by what can be done to these little things.
I am running XP, 2gig ram, 1024*768, 1000MHZ(eeectl), also internal Touchscreen and HDSPA. It is one of the best laptops i have ever had, I'm glad they finally got rid of the VTECH style interface.
Umm, if you had the power of the internet at your fingers and you had the compunction to search you would allready know that the eee can run 1024*768.
Go to www.eeeuser.com and *USE* the search button in the forums, you'll be amazed by what can be done to these little things.
I am running XP, 2gig ram, 1024*768, 1000MHZ(eeectl), also internal Touchscreen and HDSPA. It is one of the best laptops i have ever had, I'm glad they finally got rid of the VTECH style interface.
I'm a little worried about the 9"ers - The processor looks like it may actually be slower, despite the near-doubling of the clock speed. The screen's a disappointment as well. It may prove difficult to do much with a 1024x800 screen without using virtual desktops. In Linux and Windows both there are plenty of short sighted app developers that define fixed-size option dialogues and all sorts of goodies with 800+ pixel heights.