The 9" screen is very desirable but not $200 desirable. I bought the 701 because it was cheap and cheerful. It hit a sweet spot for price and performance. The screen was pretty tiny but it was workable with tweaks.
I don't get the price disparity for the 900. It should just be the 701 with a larger screen and perhaps a $30-40 premium for getting it.
Besides, isn't the next gen meant to be based on Atom? In which case the 900 is
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
DrXym @ May 7th 2008 6:25AM
The 9" screen is very desirable but not $200 desirable. I bought the 701 because it was cheap and cheerful. It hit a sweet spot for price and performance. The screen was pretty tiny but it was workable with tweaks.
I don't get the price disparity for the 900. It should just be the 701 with a larger screen and perhaps a $30-40 premium for getting it.
Besides, isn't the next gen meant to be based on Atom? In which case the 900 is