Lenovo ThinkPad X100e review

Look and feel

Lenovo refuses to call the X100e a netbook, but we're going to call a spade a spade and say that size-wise that's exactly what it looks like. The inch-thick laptop is slightly longer than 10-inch netbooks, but it's still compact enough to fit into a small handbag and carry in one hand. Our one qualm about the entire design comes with the six-cell battery, which protrudes out of the X100e's rear – not only is it awkward, but it puts the system at 3.3 pounds. That's just too heavy for something this small, and oddly enough the larger, 12-inch X201 feels noticeably lighter in comparison. Three USB ports, VGA, Ethernet, a mic jack and an SD card slot surround the chassis. Lenovo, still refusing to call it a netbook? Riiight.
Keyboard, touchpad and screen

Like most Lenovo ThinkPads you'll never be at a loss for navigation options – there's the signature red TrackPoint in the middle of the keyboard and a smaller touchpad below. We're pointing stick people, but the touchpad is decently sized, though its multitouch capabilities are finicky. Truth is we've navigated and typed on a lot of netbooks and small computers, and there's no doubt in our minds that the experience on the X100e is the top of the game.
Unsurprisingly, we prefer the X100e's matte 11.6-inch, 1366 x 768-resolution screen to that of 10-inch netbook displays. It was sufficiently bright when we watched an 1080p Alice In Wonderland clip, but when we tilted the screen back colors were quick to fade. Horizontal viewing angles were also narrow, but were adequate for sharing the screen with a family member. Like on the Edge 13, above the display is a low-light webcam, which displayed our face fairly clearly during a video call in a dark room. You hear that? It's the sound of Chatrouletters rejoicing! The speakers located on the front lip of the laptop produce decently loud sound for a system this size, though Lady Gaga's Telephone sounded fairly tinny at full blast.
Performance and battery life

Graphics-wise the X100e's ATI Radeon HD 3200 integrated GPU helps it boast better HD performance than most Atom netbooks. Out of the box we had no problems streaming 720p YouTube videos, and upgrading to Flash 10.1 pushed 1080p content along with very few pauses. Obviously when it comes to gaming the X100e doesn't fall anywhere close to the NVIDIA GT335M-powered Alienware M11x, but it did handle World of Warcraft at a decent 25fps. However while we were enjoying the multimedia boost, we noticed the bottom of the laptop getting increasingly hot. While the keyboard and touchpad stayed fairly cool, the left edge and the underside of the system created a very toasty spot on our jeans. We're inclined to blame AMD's Neo considering the HP dv2 showed similar lap-burning temperatures.
| PCMarkVantage | 3DMark06 |
Battery Life | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X100e (AMD Neo) | 1511 | 1060 | 3:27 |
| Toshiba Mini NB305 (Intel Atom N450) | N/A | 156 | 6:30 |
| ASUS UL50Vf (Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300) | 3724 | 827 / 3438 | 6:10 |
| Alienware M11x (Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300) | 2689 | 654 / 5593 | 4:30 |
Yes, AMD's Athlon Neo gives the X100e a noticeable performance and graphics boost over the typical Intel Atom processor and even some lower end Celeron ULV processors, but when it comes to battery life it destroys the ThinkPad's chance of running with the gassed up Intel-powered lappies. On our video rundown test the X100e's 63Wh, six-cell battery lasted a pretty sad three and a half hours. Most netbooks with six-cell batteries run for double that time, and most ULV laptops last over four and a half hours. We don't even want to know how long the three-cell battery lasts on a charge, but there's the answer to why Lenovo only offers the X100e with six-cell battery options on its site. We know it's taken AMD a while to really get into the "netbook" or low cost ultraportable space, but its Neo processor is just too hot and energy hungry. We're not sure pushing a dual-core version of this processor out the door is the answer -- AMD just isn't playing on the same level as Intel when it comes to low-power CPUs, and the X100e unfortunately demonstrates that all too clearly.
Wrap-up

Photography note: the ThinkPad x100e is housebroken, we just didn't like the red on cherry wood color combination.




























@brothaa Obviously I belive in the Thinkpads, excellent workhorses and the X200s is My favorite , Light, Long Battery life, Built-in Verizon card and NO Stupid Touchpad to get in my way.. I'm Kind of a Ultralight laptop Nut so I've Owned just about every Netbook thats been manufactured .. Love the size , HATE the Shortened Screen and those matchbook size touchpads.. I Thought the X100e would be the Answer... again the Touchpad just got in the way and Overall its not really up to the standards of a Thinkpad X series.. so I'll be hanging on to My x200s for a while (and waiting for my iPad to Be delivered)
I always use AMD for my desktop builds but their mobile processors suck. This notebook would be much better off with an Intel CULV.
@Luffy
Yeah, I wish they made an Intel version of this. They keyboard looks amazing, I didn't think they would be able to make it spill-proof but they've pulled it off.
@bigcow05 Engadget calls it chiclet, which I've always taken to mean raised keys. The pics make them appear to be indented, seems like an odd naming too me, unless I was just wrong in the thought on the naming convention (or the pics just deceive).
My dad hates AMD processors precisely for the reasons given in this review: he says they run hot and are inefficient. This makes it seem kind of true.
@jakey
Well jakey, your dad is right. AMD processor's do generally run hotter than Intel's offerings. It doesn't help that they're pretty much a generation behind Intel either.
My problem with this:
it shouldnt be called a thinkpad cuz it's not black.
@NeoDarkSaver: nothing that black paint can't fix
@Wekkel Or perhaps, just buying the black version.
@NeoDarkSaver it's an abomination
The X201 feels lighter because it weighs less.
@jayayess1190 "somehow"
@cuby Ha Ha! That cracked me up.
Wait, REALLY? No headphone jack? Did I miss something?
@Flutterbudget
there is a headphone jack
@ruby
Ah, yes. Stern only mentioned a mic jack in the post.
Does anyone know if this notebook (AMD Neo Mv40 + ATI GPU) would be comparable to an old 1.4ghz apple ibook G4? I'm hoping that it is at least as fast as that, anybody know?
Neat feature no reviewer points out: The screen can swivel out all the way back, letting you hold it from the side. A little weird, but it might work for reading documents in a pinch.
I have an X100e around here. The review doesn't mention one thing, the X100e's screen contrast is horrible when running on battery power. It's not the screen brightness, and there doesn't seem to be a setting to fix this...
@ photography note...
maybe white balancing the camera would have made it look better?
just kidding around, good review. I kinda want one even though i've been on osx for quite some time now. have always liked the odd design quirks thinkpad offers.
Am I high or does that not sound right? "being all we wanted it be."
it's gay.
my asus UL20 is the ultimate between netbook and notebook
The X100e is what the new Australian Digital Education Revolution device is derived from, except with a bigger screen than the DER device (10"), and an AMD CPU (instead of an Intel N450)
The reasoning behind the smaller screen (therefore bigger bezel) is that the cost per device would increase a fair bit. The bigger display only costs $5 AUD per unit more, but Windows licenses cost an extra $60 AUD since you're moving from a netbook to a laptop.
The DER machines also have N450 processors instead of the AMD ones, and the 6 cell battery is supposed to run the machine for 6 hours (the length of a school day)
Give me a break that it is odd that the x200s feels lighter. It IS lighter and for what it costs it better be. I mean magnesium alloy/carbon fiber construction don't come cheap. The two are in another league altogether.
Also this cheapening of the Thinkpad brand will backfire just like that "I-series" did for IBM.
I understand why Lenovo finally milks the Thinkpad-brand, but is it necessary to milk it with that hidious red color? SL-series is a series of it's own, but now that they even use X in a oversized netbook that doesnt deserve it. So what's next?
I was on the fence about the X100e and ended up buying an old IBM X40 instead. You can easily find 1.4GHz models on ebay for under $200. I then replaced the HD with a CF drive and have a perfectly silent Intel-based 2.7lb ThinkPad with better battery life than this.
The 1.4GHz Pentium M seems faster to me than my 1.6GHz Atom HP Mini. I get 2:30 with the small battery, 5:30 with the 6-cell and it's still lighter than the x100e. Like the x100e, it has an SDHC port, but it also has a PCMCIA slot, GB ethernet and a modem, and an optional dock that one can pick up for $50 on ebay.
The old x40s just go to show that new isn't necessarily better.
Had one of these and returned it the next day. Love thinkpads but hate AMD because of this crap. The thing runs so hot and would get choppy on battery that it was a joke.
I am glad to have this ThinkPad. The support is excellent and US-based. Quite a nice change to the ordinary. Excellent performance and battery life for such a small machine. Keep up the good work Lenovo :-) Info On The Web