Lenovo IdeaPad U160 review
An 11.6-inch laptop with a Core i7 processor. Does the Lenovo IdeaPad U160 really need more of an introduction than that? Believe it or not, the ultrathin laptop you're peering at above isn't much larger than a 10-inch netbook, but instead of packing underpowered parts (ahem, Atom) its got one of Intel's most powerful ultra-low voltage processors. For $1,149, the U160 is meant for highly mobile power users, but also those with a portable fan and a bag that can fit a few extra laptop batteries. We'll explain it all in our full review after the break.
It's not hard to tell that the U160 is part of Lenovo's IdeaPad consumer lineup by the checkered pattern that sprawls across its non-glossy lid. The cover design isn't entirely off putting in black – in red, it's a bit more obvious – but we can't deny our personal preference for Lenovo's classic looking ThinkPad line. Our real attraction is to the U160's thin and light bod – it measures only .9 inches thick and weighs 3.2 pounds. It was perfect for popping into a shoulder bag for a weekend trip and pulling out on to write an article on a cramped train seat.
In terms of build quality, the U160's plastic chassis feels quite a bit more solid than Acer's 11.6-inch Aspire One 721. However, we noticed on our unit that the keyboard deck was a bit loose – Lenovo tells us it may just be our early production unit. Port-wise, the U160 has two USB jacks, an USB / eSATA connector as well as sockets for HDMI, VGA, Ethernet, microphone and headphone sockets. It also has a four-in-one card reader. Not surprisingly, there's no optical drive onboard.
Besides the fact that the panel looked like it wasn't placed in properly, we rather like the chiclet keyboard. Similar to the keyboard on the ThinkPad Edge, the squircle shaped matte keys have a curve that makes it feel as if they've molded to your fingertips. They are a bit cramped, however -- it would have been nice to see Lenovo use the entire width of the panel.
On the same vein, the touchpad is quite small. Measuring by 2.4 by 1.5 inches, it's a bit odd that Lenovo also didn't take advantage of more of the horizontal space on the palmrest and widen it a bit. The pad is still smooth, though the two mouse buttons are a slightly mushy. Still, it's much better than being stuck with a stiff single bar like that on the Eee PC 1018P.
We're starting to think Lenovo has as big of an issue picking up decent LCDs as Acer and ASUS. Just like we saw on the IdeaPad S10-3t, the vertical viewing of the 11.6-inch, 1,366 x 768 resolution display was horrific at some angles. For instance, we tilted the screen back when watching a clip of Tosh.0 and we could barely make out any colors or see where his face started and ended. When looking at the screen head on, however, it was sufficiently bright, and the ambient light sensor adjusted the brightness to our liking. The speakers on the bottom were comparable to other laptops of its size – they're loud enough for listening to some tunes on Pandora, but not going to be the life of any party.
The U160 is without a doubt the most powerful 11.6-inch laptop we've ever toyed with thanks to its 1.20GHz Intel Core i7-640UM processor and 4GB of RAM (the Alienware M11x comes close, but it was then powered by a Core 2 Duo processor). However, it's nowhere close to being the most powerful Core i7 laptop on the market, and as the benchmarks below show, the U160 falls in between a standard voltage Core i3 laptop and some of the newer AMD Nile-powered ultraportables on the performance scale. Every day use was still snappy and our typical routine – simultaneously running Firefox with over ten tabs open, Tweetdeck, Microsoft Word, Trillian, Skype and iTunes – was no challenge for the little guy.
On the graphics side of things, the rig's Intel GMA HM55 HD was nimble enough to handle both 720p and 1080p video (local and streaming). It also managed to plow through World of Warcraft at a decent 27fps. However, as the 3DMark06 score below shows, the integrated GPU isn't quite as fast as AMD's integrated ATI Radeon HD 4225, which has been coming standard on other 11.6-inch laptops like the Acer Aspire One 721 and HP Pavilion dm1.
The U160 is certainly marketed as a multimedia machine and it can handle HD content, but it's not exactly the coolest machine on the market for those sorts of activities. And yes, we mean that literally. The entire chassis of the laptop – including its keyboard and touchpad – felt like it had been baking in the sun when streaming video. Even when we used the system to write this review and listen to some music, it got tepid and the bottom of the laptop got hot enough that we removed it from our lap to set it on the table.
So, while the i7 processor may not be as powerful as a standard Core i3 CPU, it draws less power and must result in better battery life, right? Not quite. On our video rundown test, which loops the same standard definition video at 65 brightness, the 48Wh battery managed to keep the system afloat for only 3 hours and 10 minutes. A glance at the chart below shows that both the Core i3-powered Acer TimelineX and Toshiba Portege R705 lasted an hour longer than that. Yeah, it's pretty horrendous for a laptop of this size, and even the AMD-powered Aspire One 721 lasted an extra 20 minutes.
We can't help but feel torn on Lenovo's decision to power the U160 with an ultra-low voltage Core i7 CPU. While it surely adds a lot of extra horsepower, we're left wondering who actually needs all of that in a smaller laptop, especially when other (cheaper) laptops on the market can handle HD content and basic games just as well, not to mention last longer on a charge and run much cooler.
The U160 comes loaded up with some Lenovo utilities, but compared to some of the recent laptops we've reviewed from ASUS, the preloaded software isn't all that bad. We do have to say that Lenovo's "Smile Dock" which can be launched by clicking on that little creepy smile icon on the desktop is one of the least helpful docks we've seen lately – it's full of shortcuts to Lenovo utilities, e-mail, Weatherbug, etc. At least you can search the web directly from the panel.
After spending the last few days with the IdeaPad U160, we've come to the conclusion that the laptop is only for the few that demand more processing power than some of the other ultraportables on the market, yet are willing to put up with a few annoyances to have it. No matter how you look at it, these days $1,150 is a lot of money to shell out on a smaller machine, especially when other laptops out there that are just as light, run longer on a charge, and cost less -- just take the $799 13-inch Toshiba Portégé 705 or $450 Acer Aspire One 721. Yes, the U160 packs more CPU power, but at the end of the day you'll have to live with the heat and battery drain that it ultimately causes. And frankly, we wouldn't wish that upon anyone.
Look and feel

In terms of build quality, the U160's plastic chassis feels quite a bit more solid than Acer's 11.6-inch Aspire One 721. However, we noticed on our unit that the keyboard deck was a bit loose – Lenovo tells us it may just be our early production unit. Port-wise, the U160 has two USB jacks, an USB / eSATA connector as well as sockets for HDMI, VGA, Ethernet, microphone and headphone sockets. It also has a four-in-one card reader. Not surprisingly, there's no optical drive onboard.
Keyboard, touchpad and screen

On the same vein, the touchpad is quite small. Measuring by 2.4 by 1.5 inches, it's a bit odd that Lenovo also didn't take advantage of more of the horizontal space on the palmrest and widen it a bit. The pad is still smooth, though the two mouse buttons are a slightly mushy. Still, it's much better than being stuck with a stiff single bar like that on the Eee PC 1018P.
We're starting to think Lenovo has as big of an issue picking up decent LCDs as Acer and ASUS. Just like we saw on the IdeaPad S10-3t, the vertical viewing of the 11.6-inch, 1,366 x 768 resolution display was horrific at some angles. For instance, we tilted the screen back when watching a clip of Tosh.0 and we could barely make out any colors or see where his face started and ended. When looking at the screen head on, however, it was sufficiently bright, and the ambient light sensor adjusted the brightness to our liking. The speakers on the bottom were comparable to other laptops of its size – they're loud enough for listening to some tunes on Pandora, but not going to be the life of any party.
Performance and battery life

On the graphics side of things, the rig's Intel GMA HM55 HD was nimble enough to handle both 720p and 1080p video (local and streaming). It also managed to plow through World of Warcraft at a decent 27fps. However, as the 3DMark06 score below shows, the integrated GPU isn't quite as fast as AMD's integrated ATI Radeon HD 4225, which has been coming standard on other 11.6-inch laptops like the Acer Aspire One 721 and HP Pavilion dm1.
The U160 is certainly marketed as a multimedia machine and it can handle HD content, but it's not exactly the coolest machine on the market for those sorts of activities. And yes, we mean that literally. The entire chassis of the laptop – including its keyboard and touchpad – felt like it had been baking in the sun when streaming video. Even when we used the system to write this review and listen to some music, it got tepid and the bottom of the laptop got hot enough that we removed it from our lap to set it on the table.
So, while the i7 processor may not be as powerful as a standard Core i3 CPU, it draws less power and must result in better battery life, right? Not quite. On our video rundown test, which loops the same standard definition video at 65 brightness, the 48Wh battery managed to keep the system afloat for only 3 hours and 10 minutes. A glance at the chart below shows that both the Core i3-powered Acer TimelineX and Toshiba Portege R705 lasted an hour longer than that. Yeah, it's pretty horrendous for a laptop of this size, and even the AMD-powered Aspire One 721 lasted an extra 20 minutes.
We can't help but feel torn on Lenovo's decision to power the U160 with an ultra-low voltage Core i7 CPU. While it surely adds a lot of extra horsepower, we're left wondering who actually needs all of that in a smaller laptop, especially when other (cheaper) laptops on the market can handle HD content and basic games just as well, not to mention last longer on a charge and run much cooler.
| PCMarkVantage |
3DMark06 |
Battery Life | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad U160 | 3863 | 1175 | 3:10 |
| Acer Aspire One 721 |
1814 |
1235 | 3:30 |
| Toshiba Portege R705 (Core i3-350M) | 5024 | 1759 | 4:25 |
| Acer TimelineX 4820T (Core i3-350M) | 4926 | 1724 | 5:04 |
| Dell Vostro V13 (Core 2 Duo SU7300) | 2687 | 556 | 2:39 |
| ASUS UL50Vf (Core 2 Duo SU7300) | 3724 | 827/3438 | 6:10 |
Software

Wrap-up






























Next !!!
@plwh888
product name rip-off !
/s
@plwh888 | yet another ultraportable laptop rendered useless by crappy battery life.
@gschier & @engadget
Please note that this is the best x86 processor (performance/battery life) available anywhere.
It should be about 1.5x faster than a standard SU7300 when running at max output. And the average battery life should equal to the SU7300.
If this device is in anyway too hot, too slow or too thirsty ... then this is an error by Lenovo either software or internal hardware/designs.
This CULV processor was (and is) in high anticipation, I know because I've looked at its specifics.
mmmm, oreos...
lenovo > *
Yawn*
It's so cute! Makes me miss my Sony 10.7 inch T series.
This is a solid product.
Looks extremely mediocre. Lenovo - you are forgetting your roots.
You mean laptops like this primarily for the Chinese market?
Sure, its smaller and probably has better battery life than the Alienware 11x, but for people demanding multimedia out of a small form factor, I don't think this quite compete's with alienwares offering and price.
There is some internal competition from the Thinkpad X201i (in some markets), it's priced similar to the U160 but has the i3-330M, a bit bigger, a bit heavier, a bit heavier, pretty good battery life...
You call 3 hours bad battery life? I'm sorry, but you've gotta be shitting me. My laptop, right out of the box, only had 30 minutes. Seriously, besides, 3 hours is good. Are you going to be headed over to Africa or something? What would require you to be without cables for so long?
@Rasenganfan2
You should probably send whatever laptop you bought with 30 minutes of battery life back immediately.
@Rasenganfan2
You mean the target audience for a 11" laptop? The whole point of an ultraportable is that it is small and light enough to take with you on the bus/train/plane. This also means that you need enough power to last the journey.
Students are also a good market, they want something they can do their work on without having to find a powerpoint between lectures. With a 3 hour battery life I would need to carry around 2 spare batteries to last me through a day of lectures.
@allanbeaudry Well, I didn't know that was bad 2 years ago... I was new to computers. God knows this thing would go back quickly now.
@Tilduke You have a good point. Plus I thought that this was your standard 15" laptop. So yeah, I can understand that now, thank you for explaining.
Engadget - are you forgetting about the m11x, which not only offers the same processor, but a better graphics card, for a better price? I think the m11x might even offer a battery life if I remember correctly.
@Spiritbeast
True but to most people it looks like ASS. Personally I like the look.
What! Another Lenovo without a touchpoint!
It will not be on my shopping list.
@MAS It's an ideapad, the consumer line.
I notice that Lenovo has a habit of picking a display with a high resolution, but a horrific viewing angles. And not to mention the bad color reproduction. My friend had a 13 inch Lenovo laptop, and the default windows 7 wallpaper and the whole entire UI had a purplish tinge.
It looks nice, but man would I miss their nicer black rounded keyboard and the pointer nub. Still, if you're desperate for a portable workstation...
@FelixDraconis
The x201 comes with i7 as well I think?
When you review a notebook, the first thing you need to say is whether the LCD is glossy or matte!
a fast dedicated gpu is more important (smooth ui, effects, games) than a fast cpu, except you're a mathematics or spreadsheet whore or something like that.
@shizzledmg
GPU handles graphics
CPU handles everything else (including the graphics if you want)
Personally if I was split between the two I would choose a faster CPU over GPU because it would speed more aspects, increasing user experience.
But I'm smart enough to know that what I really want is a CPU that can deliver the highest performance available (640-UM) at the amount of battery life (6h) I need for its size (10"/5000mAh battery), and have switchable graphics to something beefy like ATi 5650 ... Bazinga!
"The U160 is without a doubt the most powerful 11.6-inch laptop we've ever toyed with thanks to its 1.20GHz Intel Core i7-640UM processor and 4GB of RAM."
Really? Because the m11x is available with the same processor, for less money, with dedicated graphics. I'm pretty sure the top of the line m11x with 8GB of ram, a 256GB SSD, an Nvidia Geforce gt 335m, and the same core-i7 processor would be faster.
@doyleman7 The M11x we reviewed had a Core 2 Duo ULV processor. Yes, the one out now is faster and is better for the price.
@Joanna Stern
Sorry, I guess I didn't take the time to read the quote I was criticizing clearly enough. I didn't realize the article was referring to just laptops tested by engadget.
I would pick the X201 over this unit.
Plus white all over the inside, yuck.
I'd suggest that you - for contrast if nothing else - also review the ThinkPad X201. I'm writing this on the i5-520M version, and it's cool, quiet, as light as the U160, and with my optional 9-cell battery I get ~6 hours normal use (music, web surfing. typing). Plenty for two to three movies local or streamed. It's also lightning fast, and actually has _useful_ included software. And did I mention the build quality? Only downside I've found is the tiny touchpad, which has quite buggy multi-touch. I've upgraded it to 4GB of RAM and switched the HDD for an X25-m 80GB SSD, and ... well, it's the best laptop I've ever laid hands on.
Does the X201 have the same 1366x768 or higher resolution screen? (I think last I checked it had 1440x900...)
I also would go for the X201, as it has the ThinkPad keyboard and the amazing trackpoint that I miss :(
I did a review on the U160 with the i5-520 CPU for our german blog (cyberbloc.de) and figured out that its never running on the highest speed-step-mode. Opposite to the official sayings the CPU never does the 1.75GHz, instead its never stepping higher than 1,46GHz...same effect on some customers notebooks, no matter what benchmarktool you use. Lenovo Germany till now tell the customers to send it back as "broken"!
How is it on your U160's? Does anyone reach the full CPU-Power? Or did you maybe get the same problems? I think it could become a kind of a recall action if its a problem which hits the whole series.
Besides from that I have had the same critics on the U160 as joanna had. Mainly its build-quality disappointed me the most.