Snapchat has taken to its blog to explain that it re-worded the documents to be written in the "way people actually talk" in order to be "upfront and clear" with users. It also clarified the point that the images that it wants permission to retain and share are just your public shots so that they can be syndicated across the globe. Since the firm is now offering in-app purchases in the form of paid replays, it had to insert clauses asking for permission to sell those images.
This isn't the first time that a ham-fisted update to a terms of service has caused some pretty negative blowback. Earlier this year, Spotify suffered a backlash from plenty of people after updating its policy with vague, ill-defined legalese that made it sound as if it was going to sneak into your home and steal your cat. Perhaps it's time for all of these companies to begin thinking seriously about hiring some better lawyers.
[Image Credit: Getty]