LG adopts in-plane switching tech for new LCD HDTVs

Hitachi's in-plane switching technology's been making the rounds of late, and LG Taiwan's the latest to pick it up for use in future LCD HDTVs. Doubling frame-rate, providing a wider field of view, and supposedly upping durability (among other things), apparently we can start to see some IPS-enabled TVs from Korea's #2 in the not too distant future.

[Via Far East Gizmos]

[ralpheazy Posted Mar 23rd 2008 9:59PM]

what 360 game is that?

[(Unverified) Posted Mar 24th 2008 12:13AM]

i think thats nene for blue dragon

[(Unverified) Posted Mar 23rd 2008 10:13PM]

LG TVs in the US have been using IPS for a while, as far back as 2005. I can't really say that it makes any imporvement over any other manufacturers displays without it though.

[Bruce Banner Posted Mar 23rd 2008 10:50PM]

He's right, check out the LG 32LB9D as an example.

[EAC Posted Mar 24th 2008 12:28AM]

Harrie is right. LG's main panel supplier, LG Display (formerly LG.Philips LCD), has been a part of the IPS consortium since the organization was formed. I'm pretty sure that none of LG's TVs use VA, rather than IPS (S-IPS, actually).

[Randomness Posted Mar 23rd 2008 10:02PM]

Didn't Syntax-Brillian Olevia tv's have IPS years ago?

[v3xx Posted Mar 23rd 2008 10:12PM]

and you still cant afford one.

[Randomness Posted Mar 24th 2008 4:16AM]

Actually, I knew I heard IPS and S-IPS and Olevia somewhere, and both my Olevia TV's have it. o.0 It's not like they're super high-end either. I did some research and Syntax uses LG IPS panels in some sets. They've been doing so since 1996 at least. Is this article correct at it being a new thing, or was there some update of the IPS technology?

[v3xx Posted Mar 23rd 2008 10:11PM]

lol @ his tiny arm

[thestewman Posted Mar 23rd 2008 10:20PM]

Great page interpretation

[(Unverified) Posted Mar 23rd 2008 10:33PM]

The BabelFish translation is great!

"LG always has regarding the television "is new" the view! Were more along with the recent years consumer regarding the liquid crystal product request, the global thin television leadership brand LG electron, 整合面 the lumber yard technical superiority, will promote in 2008 renews the better liquid crystal to meet consumer's need!..."

[(Unverified) Posted Mar 23rd 2008 10:58PM]

Frankly, this isn't a news. LG Displays has been the major manufacturer of IPS panels ever since LG started manufacturing LCDs. Almost all TV LCD panels are either VA or IPS, and LG uses one of them.

[tumnasgt Posted Mar 24th 2008 12:16AM]

Wow, I can't wait to see a viewing angle of more than 178 degress, it will serve what purpose again?

[DBG Posted Mar 24th 2008 12:38AM]

I am planning on buying a 52" Samsung (LN-T5265F to be specific) LCD HDTV. It retails for 3000$, but I found the same retail package online for 1850$ with 3-day truck shipping. It is a good idea to go ahead with this tv (it has everything I need), or would it be worth waiting a couple months?

- Tony R.

[DBG Posted Mar 24th 2008 1:02PM]

Oh, if this feature is just a touch-screen ability then I'm not interested.

[ethana2 Posted Mar 24th 2008 1:47AM]

Can that approach benefit OLED too? I want a 4 MP OLED multi-touch dellbuntu tablet with a 16GB SSD and WiMax, built in webcam, 1GB of RAM, C2D on 45nm, 18 cell Li-ion, external optical drive.....

It's just a matter of time and price.. *sigh*
I may be waiting a while, but hopefully I can get that within the next year.

[(Unverified) Posted Mar 24th 2008 3:46AM]

Is it me or does that guy in the picture look like an Asian Keanu Reeves?

[(Unverified) Posted Mar 24th 2008 6:38AM]

Sad to see racism has made its way onto Engadget! :(

[(Unverified) Posted Mar 24th 2008 12:58PM]

Wait, I'm confused -- this article is written in such a way as to indicate in-plane switching is a somewhat new technology, but Panasonic's been touting their IPS technology since 2005. Me confused.

[Wwhat Posted Mar 24th 2008 1:13PM]

You know it does say HDTV IPS, so perhaps it's the resolution that now went HD where previous LG IPS's were lower res?
Or it's just another case of engadget rehashing years old news of course..