Motorola insider tells all about the fall of a technology icon

In researching the myriad claims raised in this letter -- which we believe to be true -- we also discovered a number of other unsettling things about Motorola's corporate past in the last five years, such as certain gross corporate excesses demanded by Zander and his inner circle (like a small fleet of extravagant private jets, where most companies that size might only have one, if any), or the fact that Motorola's current CEO, Greg Brown, is so technologically out of touch he refuses to use a computer for communications, and has all his email correspondences printed by his secretary and replied to by dictation.
There's no doubt in our minds that Motorola is in dire straits. But today's news of the company's broken-off mobile division only serves to cement the fact that the company no longer knows how to conduct its core consumer business, and is squandering time and money as it flounders in a market that long since passed it by. Motorola did not comment on this story. Letter posted after the break.
-----
Dear Greg Brown, and the rest of the executive team at Motorola,
As you may or may not recall, I worked with Geoffrey Frost as a personal adviser during his days as Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer of the company. I was the one quoted in Forbes in 2003 as saying "Motorola's biggest problem is that Samsung kicks ass," and eventually came to spend nearly three years working with Geoffrey during his efforts to revamp the company's mobile lineup, which eventually saw the launch of the RAZR. As I told the company's senior designers at Motorola's 75th anniversary meeting: create something cooler (and more expensive) than anything else out there, and everyone will want it.
After the success of the RAZR, while Geoffrey was tied up every which way in ROKR development, meetings, criscrossing travel, and so on, through his associates I implored the company to beef up their software expertise, and focus on creating socially networked devices (this was in the years before MySpace and Facebook became the juggernauts they are today). Your predecessor, Ed Zander, had little interest in this, and instead insisted on parlaying his relationship with Steve Jobs into the ill-fated ROKR effort in order to prop up Motorola's stock price.
Zander, who seemed to care more about his golf score than running one of America's greatest technology companies, left all of the hard work to Geoffrey; I've always considered it Motorola's dirty little secret that the strategy for their entire profit machine was run by the company's CMO -- not the rest of the company's executives, who are as inept now as they have ever been.
Many close to Geoffrey believed Ed Zander worked him to death, putting the pressure of the fate of the company in his hands. [That was certainly the buzz around the industry at the time. -Ed.] I took his untimely death in 2005 very hard, and knew that the company would head downhill in the aftermath. On a personal note, Lynne, his wife blamed the company for his passing. She committed suicide soon after.
Meanwhile, Ed Zander continued to reap the dividends of Geoffrey's work as the company made billions in profit from overselling the RAZR for years. Instead of channeling that money into the obvious -- further development of groundbreaking consumer devices -- Zander purchased enterprise companies such as Symbol ($3.9b), and engineered billions of dollars in stock buybacks.
As I told Zander in a phone call in 2007, I felt that he was setting the company up for massive failure. He had the audacity to say, "Well, maybe Geoffrey should have come up with a better successor to the RAZR," and told me to "Wait for big things in 2008." I guess he was right -- the golden parachute he got for his exit from the company was worth about 30 million dollars -- and that doesn't include his accumulated Motorola stock.
Your appointment to the position of chief executive gave me cause for hope, and I reached out to you; I knew you were one of the main drivers behind the enterprise acquisitions, and that you had zero expertise in consumer devices. Surely you could use some help in turning Motorola's flagging cellphone business around?
But apparently different from the rest of the incompetent senior executives at Motorola -- except instead of merely being inept, you're actually actively killing the company. Your lack of understanding of the consumer side of Motorola doesn't give you a valid reason for selling the handset business; moreover, publicly disclosing your explorations of such a move, in an attempt to keep Carl Icahn off your back, shows how much you value the safety of your incompetence.
You clearly have no interest in fighting the good fight and attempting to mold Motorola into the market leader it can and should be. Taking control of the handset division, as you have recently announced, will accomplish very little except but to give you an ability to say, "We tried our best" -- which you haven't -- when you finally do cart the business off to the highest bidder.
In order to turn the handset division around, you need to bring in another Frost; someone worldly and dynamic who is more interested in Motorola's success than their own corporate career. You need to task the company's designers with the same mantra that created the RAZR -- make me a phone that looks, feels, and works like a symbol of wealth and privilege. Recognize the superiority of American software, and bring back those jobs so irresponsibly outsourced to China and Russia. Fully embrace embedded Linux and Google's Android initiative, and take the phone operating system out of the stone age.
Recognize that, while rich people don't really know what they want, the lower end of the market does -- and fund the development of an online "crowdsourced" device design platform to take advantage of this fact. Get rid of all of your silly, useless marketing, including those overpriced and completely ineffective celebrity endorsements, and do one unified global campaign with Daft Punk (the only group whose global appeal extends from American hip hoppers to trendy Shanghai club kids to middle-aged Londoners). Understand that the next big feature in handsets isn't a camera or a music player -- it is social connectedness; build expertise in this area, and sell it down the entire value chain.
I was there when Motorola's handset division was brought back from the brink of death 5 years ago. Follow my advice, and we can do it again.
Maybe it sounds like I take the downfall of Motorola personally; I do. It was my experience at Motorola, with people like Geoffrey and all of the loyal employees who still remain, that taught me what corporate America can and should be. But with people such as Zander and yourself, Motorola symbolizes the worst of our country's corporate culture.
As an immigrant American, and someone who has traveled all over the world, I really do appreciate the uniqueness and importance of the American culture of creativity and ingenuity. Whereas other countries back their money on gold and commodities, we back ours on our ability to invent the future. The failure of Motorola as an American institution of creativity and innovation, should you let it happen, will now be entirely of your doing. Hopefully you'll keep that in mind while the board has the accountants prepare your golden parachute.
Regards,
Numair Faraz
Dated Feb 5, 2008. Letter edited for form.


















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 4)
Max Savin @ Mar 26th 2008 1:13PM
We need Steve Jobs to take over.
Crayola @ Mar 26th 2008 1:15PM
No! We need Icahn on board, he has been trying to get rid of that shitty CEO all along. I doubt he is out to destroy the value of his shareholding.
CUBSWILLWIN @ Mar 26th 2008 1:19PM
Steve will probably buy it for revenge when they made him the stupid and limited ROKR, and then send every moto employee to China to work sleepless nights to make him iphones :P
Neil @ Mar 26th 2008 1:24PM
@CUBSWILLWIN
What are you talking about? Revenge? Steve is the one that forced Motorola to make the Rokr with the limitations.
nerdtalker @ Mar 26th 2008 1:33PM
Steve Jobs isn't the answer. I hope you're being facetious. The guy is already the visionary for one overwhelmingly successful company with a dominating mobile handset, doing another would only dilute that vision.
I do agree, however, that Motorola does need its own equivalent of a Steve Jobs. That letter was refreshing and expository, and explains what I think a lot of people have had on their minds; how Motorola could hit a brick wall after the success of the RAZR.
It's pretty obvious now that the company sat on its collective ass selling the damn product forever until nobody cared anymore. Then they did nothing about it. Get an engineer into the CEO position, get a marketing person into CEO, get ANYONE who gives a damn or knows a thing about mobile products. Hell, get Ryan Block over there.
What's ironic is that from the sound of this letter, a majority of Engadget and Engadget Mobile readers are probably more qualified to be CEO than Greg "Kill Moto Dead" Brown.
Max Savin @ Mar 26th 2008 1:40PM
Yeah the comment was a joke but yes someone equivalent to Steve Jobs. I think the company just milked all its products and is now trying to bang all the money out of the company. Its always stupid people that make big decisions.
Brian f @ Mar 26th 2008 2:27PM
If this were the 90's Jobs couldn't take over. He was WAY too busy running his company into the ground. Until Jonathan Ive(designer of iMac, iPod) and his design team came and pulled his smug ass out of the fire. Apple is what it is today not because of Steve Jobs, but in spite of Steve Jobs.
CUBSWILLWIN @ Mar 26th 2008 2:31PM
He wnated a phone that worked with itunes so yes he forced motorala to do it. But revenge fro making the phone so bad.
Heathen @ Mar 26th 2008 3:25PM
Yes style over substance is exactly what motorola needs!
Rich @ Mar 26th 2008 3:24PM
Everyone I know who has ever worked at Motorola says it's Dilbert-land.
The fact that their boss doesn't know how to use e-mail doesn't surprise me.
Chris @ Mar 26th 2008 7:47PM
Sorry Brian F but you don't know what you are talking about.
nikster @ Mar 26th 2008 8:39PM
@Neil: I bet Apple wanted the ROKR to succeed as much as anyone - it was their first iPhone and they thought they could do it with Motorola. Turned out Moto insisted on producing a turd - the looks of the ROKR alone should make it perfectly clear that Apple had no influence on this design.
Apple's revenge was to introduce the ROKR at the same time as the iPod nano. It was a bit cheeky in a "see that's what the device of the future should look like"-way but honestly also the only way to prevent a PR disaster.
Andrew @ Mar 27th 2008 9:22AM
@brian f: Not sure what you mean by your comment-Apple? Remember that Apple was headed for the toilet *before* Jobs came back, it was Jobs that created the iMac, Jobs that cannibalized the corpse of NeXTStep to make OS X, Jobs who showed the industry that design matters. It was the old-line business dudes who messed Apple up, and it looks like the same thing is happening at Motorola. Years of the same tired design with minor variations-it's a testament to the original RAZR that they still have a handset business to sell.
Mark @ Mar 26th 2008 1:16PM
wow. great read ... so sad to see moto end like this.
nDee @ Mar 27th 2008 1:45AM
It's ironic because in Cantonese(a kind of Chinese, not all chinese speak Putonghua or Mandarin)
Motorola means no more bussiness.
Ironic but so true
coab @ Apr 13th 2008 12:08AM
@ nDee
actually, moto would literally "no head" which in turn would translate more into someone who is stupid.
same with if you said used the phonetics from motorola in chinese. and yes, i speak cantonese. fluently. since i was 2.
cassio @ May 6th 2008 9:11PM
@coab
cool, you speak cantonese, but are you from hong kong? if you are, then surely you've heard of 冇得撈喇
apologies to everyone else for typing chinese :)
CUBSWILLWIN @ Mar 26th 2008 1:17PM
I mourn for you Moto, I mourn. You are not alone
Eric Law @ Mar 28th 2008 9:23AM
Not alone indeed.
Commodore and Digital both seemed to rest on their past achievements too long.
Tony Rayo @ Apr 1st 2008 6:20AM
Hello-.... Goodbye Moto
Fred @ Mar 26th 2008 1:21PM
I just don't get why they're doing so badly. I know plenty of people who are still buying their phones. I mean I just bought three of them for my family 2 months ago. The hardware isn't bad even though the software could be better. They still have a decent brand perception among the general public, if they'd just get their asses in gear they could probably pull out of this.
Jeff @ Mar 27th 2008 1:52PM
I've never met a single person who owns (or owned) a RAZR that doesn't say "this phone is a worthless piece of trash."
...and i know plenty of people who have or have had RAZRs.
i don't know where you get the idea that they still have good market perception, but that's not been the case in my experience. (anecdotally.)
achates @ Mar 27th 2008 4:06PM
Jeff's anecdotal experience is radically different from mine - the non-tech people I know who have RAZRs have valued them highly. That may be based more on the physical design than on software or performance, but the people in question use voice calling and occasional texting and find the phone perfectly adequate.
Marcus Sletten @ Mar 27th 2008 4:15PM
*smirks*
My HS850 headset was CRAP. EXPENSIVE crap
Same with the second one i got (thinking the first may have been faulty)
The HT820 BT headphones were uncomfortable, tinny sound, people couldn't hear me well, and fell apart easily
The H700 i currently have (given to me as a gift, I did not buy it)similar issues as the HS850. dont use it anymore.
the S9's LOOKED cool but were uncomfortable, sounds was decent, but phone calls only came in MONO on one ear. and ended up giving my neck issues with the way it hung on my head. My BF who currently uses them sounds like he is talking into a speakerphone half the time.
the Plantronics Pulsars i have right now sound better overall (little lacking on the high, but more bass than he S9) thought he control design i will give to the s9's (better control design by far)
Basically, pretty much EVERYTHING motorola I have dealt with was subpar and expensive
Fred @ Mar 27th 2008 5:23PM
I realize that a lot of people HAVE had issues w/ Motorola phones, but for the GENERAL PUBLIC they are well liked. Apparently their BT headsets are crap, but I wouldn't know. I think most people who are not technically inclined and readers of Tech Blogs like them.
Franklin @ Mar 28th 2008 5:28PM
Moto is still market leader in the US -- but mobile phones are a global market, and they've lost everywhere else. Losing the US is inevitable if, as is rumored, their pipeline of new products has nothing innovative.
bryan @ Apr 10th 2008 5:39PM
I used to own an Nokia, the cheap crappy kind, not even flip phone, everyone at work made fun of it, etc. Went out and spent $200 on a nice Motorola, and I hate it. I'd give anything to be rid of this piece of crap. I'll never buy a Motorola again, and I'll probably dig up my old Nokia and get service transferred back to it before my contract ends.
Tim @ Mar 26th 2008 1:21PM
Wow, thats a hard hitting letter. This answers quite a few of the questions I had about motorola.
Lostman @ Mar 26th 2008 8:32PM
I believe this will fall on deaf ears...........
Adam Licht @ Mar 26th 2008 1:25PM
Motorola, to a large extent, represents a much deeper problem within American society, and indeed illustrates the battle for the soul of the American consumer. What we're seeing today is the generational gap between the Baby Boomers and their children. People in their 50s and over who run many of America's major corporations view the computer and the internet as a tool, because that's where they were first exposed to it: at work. The younger members of society view it as an opportunity, having grown up watching it grow with them. The driving force behind many of the corporate closures we've seen in the last ten years has to do primarily with the failure of a company to embrace technology and to use it to streamline their business. There are a great many young, talented, and eminently disenfranchised people who labor as fast food workers during the day, but who develop the next great innovation in a dark room in front of a computer screen at night. The difference is that they don't seek to market and profit from their ideas and labor; instead, they give it back and let others build from it.
Motorola's fall from grace could easily have been avoided had they chosen to learn from the success of the RAZR and built on it. Instead, they hand out rehashed versions of old technology and warmed over designs that do nothing to inspire. That's why, after I replaced my V9 with a RAZR, I replaced my RAZR with a BlackBerry instead. I know a lot of people that have done the same, and will do the same in the months and years to come.
digitalh @ Mar 26th 2008 1:52PM
Well said, Adam. THIS should be posted in every boardroom...
Now, as for this:
"Motorola's current CEO, Greg Brown, is so technologically out of touch he refuses to use a computer for communications, and has all his email correspondences printed by his secretary and replied to by dictation."
Please tell me this is a joke.
Kawika @ Mar 26th 2008 8:24PM
Dictation? Seriously? How in the world could a technology company as famed for innovation as Motorola used to be hire someone so seemingly out of touch with his market? From a BusinessWeek article here: http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/nov2007/tc20071130_854706.htm
"Prior to joining Motorola, Mr. Brown was chairman and CEO of Micromuse Inc., a network management software company. Before that, he was President of Ameritech Custom Business Services and Ameritech New Media Inc. Before joining Ameritech in 1987, Mr. Brown held a variety of sales and marketing positions with AT&T for five years, resulting in 25 years of high-tech experience."
And he doesn't use a computer? Is this for real?
achates @ Mar 27th 2008 4:16PM
I'm not going to defend Motorola management at all, but saying it's "simple" to come up with successors to iconic products is wrong - most companies that have had breakaway consumer products have failed to produce another equivalent winner.
As to reading one's e-mail on-line - I suspect most CEOs read their mail in print, simply because they can do that in the car or plane or during holes in meetings. A CEO's life is about face-to-face interaction; carrying or using a laptop is just a distraction.
y3k.nik @ Mar 26th 2008 1:25PM
Who is Icahn? I dont think i have ever heard of him/her!
Aytunc @ Mar 26th 2008 2:44PM
Google him and watch the 60 Minutes video segment on how he hacks the inept corporate boards,
good riddance Moto, two phones (startac and razr) for a lifetime of crappy does not cut for a technological advances
Slavior @ Mar 26th 2008 2:41PM
He's a corporate raider, whipping badly performing companies into shape.
Adrian Williams @ Mar 26th 2008 1:28PM
They will sell the cell phone division and keep to making set top boxes and chips
JP23 @ Mar 26th 2008 6:09PM
Uh Maybe you haven't heard but Mot hasn't made chips in a few years. Does the name Freescale mean anything to you?
Jason G. @ Mar 26th 2008 1:28PM
So very sad and humbling. Motorola just never could adapt to the new role handset makers play in the mobile space.
Cellenin @ Mar 26th 2008 1:29PM
This is what happens when you lets MBA's run a business! Every company in the USA should have this posted in every boardroom hall and walkway.
siddharth s @ Mar 26th 2008 3:05PM
huh? What do MBAs have to do with this? This is basically a result of greedy, incompetent folks making wide decisions. Based on what I hear, they don't come off as very ethical either (sucking a declining business for private jets?!?!?). And I've seen my share of engineers and business folks who fit the same profile. Ultimately, if the person is incompetent or dishonest, it doesn't matter what his qualifications are.
FYI, I'm an engineer with a graduate degree, currently working towards my MBA. Bad people are just bad - degrees don't help ...
NuShrike @ Mar 26th 2008 4:40PM
He's talking about all those "executives" whose only claim to fame is working in the executive pools of other companies based solely on their MBAs. I've personally seen a crappy web-programmer here climb his way up the ladder with just his MBA.
You don't want these people in leadership positions in technology companies.
Motdude @ Mar 27th 2008 4:38PM
Greg Brown doesn't have an MBA
jiganto @ Mar 26th 2008 1:31PM
The guy has the right idea, but I'll tell you what's killing off Motorola. The RAZR wasn't good, it was complete garbage, the only thing it had going for it was the novelty factor. When they first started rolling out the V300, V400, and V600 those were great phones... but far from perfect, they had a notorious reliability issue and buggy OS. However, the development of the hardware and software stopped there, worse yet they completely failed to address their reliability issue... such that when the RAZR came out, all it was was a repackaged V600 with the same shitty OS and the same reliability issues. The only thing it had going for it was the slim novelty factor which managed to move millions of units and propped up the company for a few years more.
Motorola has some great engineers working for it, the problem lies with their management just as Faraz has pointed out. The company has completely lost touch with the consumer phone industry and as such has absolutely nothing new to put into the market for competition. Motorola has the resources to be a market leader, the only thing holding it back is the terrible management it currently has.
david copeland @ Mar 26th 2008 2:58PM
Um, I really beg to differ with your comment about RAZR's being crap.
I've had several for 3 years, and they are rock-solid. No reliabilty issues at all. Are you basing your comments on actual use or what others have said?
The RAZRs I had felt great (magnesium case), had a great size to them (perfectly usable keyboard - not this 'chicklet' small button shit on 90% of cell phones) and worked like a champ. As far as software went, hey, mine were verizon and I blame them for disabling features, including Bluetooth.
But to call the RAZR crap is complete bull.
Rich @ Mar 26th 2008 3:33PM
@David
The hardware design was good but it hid the major problem with all Moto phones - the software on it stunk!
The UI is one of the most painful messes I've ever come across. The address book wouldn't even let you search by more than one letter at a time - utterly useless if you had more than 100 contacts.
And then we come to Moto's great Linux strategy. It was going to save us all from Moto's existing crappy software. Except it didn't because it doesn't even support 3G. Oh dear, Moto.
cswallow01 @ Mar 26th 2008 1:31PM
Not that I'm 100% behind the iPhone, but I mean how can Motorola compete against it? Apple's the one company (beyond Moto's own execs) that's hurting Motorola itself. The foolish ROKR sucked and the iPhone blew the RAZR off the map!
The only thing Motorola can do is apply iPhone features to the RAZR. Beyond that Apple has it all!
Motorola isn't going to make a candy-bar phone to compete with the iPhone. Flip phones are what people want! Because they're slim and light.
The iPhone only won because of it's elegant simplicity and beauty... That still doesn't mean people want bricks!
Moto still has a chance to merge the iPhone into a RAZR, but once Apple comes out with the iPhone Flip, it's GAME OVER!
Moto would haft to do a iPhone/RAZR hybrid! And do it damn, quick to save themselves!
Robert @ Mar 26th 2008 1:48PM
The next RAZR doesn't need to be an iPhone, nor a Blackberry, or anything like that. It should just bring a little innovation with its current form-factor!
potato @ Mar 26th 2008 1:45PM
cswallow: The iPhone is still a premium product, and it didn't kill the RAZR - every phone from LG, Sony, and Samsung did. Moto was dying long before Steve Jobs trotted onto that stage.
None of Moto's currently lineup can begin to compare with the competition coming from LG, Samsung, and Sony. All of them have better features and software (especially the software) than Motorola. It's hardly a surprise they're in this position.
Twaize @ Mar 26th 2008 2:36PM
You might not be aware of this, but "candybar" phones are the most popular phones in Europe, flip-phones are mainly American.