Symwave to demo USB 3.0 external storage solution at CES
We get the feeling that Symwave won't be the only outfit at CES 2009 showing off the flashiest revision of the USB protocol, but it will reportedly be the first to showcase USB 3.0 transfers to and from an external storage device. 'Course, we've already seen that SuperSpeed USB works (and works quickly), so we'll be most interested in seeing what external HDDs it relies on to make the magic happen. After all, the protocol can't gain traction without a small swarm of supportive devices on the market, right?



















Hopefully it really is fast, cuz after having my external 500gig, and transfering 4gig HD movies to it, it takes like 3 minutes to transfer.
WARNING: High speed USB device plugged into non-High Speed port. You're hardware may not work properly. To resolve this issue Click Here X
Your X. It does nothing.
::shakes fist::
Just another thing to make my ipod become obsolete faster *glares at steve jobs* - *quickly takes back glare and hopes for forgiveness*
WTH does Steve Jobs have to do with any of this?
Everyone knows that the real reason he's getting ill is because he replaced his nervous system with daisy-chained firewire cables. He's not even thinking about USB.
You're gonna have to start glaring at Phil...
would be great if all the old usb 2 devices can run at 3 speed as long as you have them on the computer.
No. They won't. Pretty obvious.
Yeahhhh...
The adapters aren't even the same. I don't think they will be backwards compatible..
would be nice if my parents dial-up connection could handle broadband speeds if i plug it into my ethernet port
...god i hate being home
if it's not at least two terabytes I'm not interested
If they could transfer 2TB from a laptop to a external drive - in less than 5 minutes - I'd be impressed
If they came up with a 2 Tb single external drive I'm impressed.
@Arkenklo
Almost there -- Seagate has a single 1.5 TB hard drive. Also, it's "TB" (byte), not "Tb" (bit).
I know. That's why 2 Tb would be impressive.
Actually, it's TiB, Tebibyte, 1024^4. TB = 10^6 byte = 8*10^6 bit. Tb = 10^6 bit. But I usually write Tb, it looks better then TB.
What they need to do is get two of those ridiculous terabyte ssd raid arrays and transfer a good 200 gigs between the two over usb3. That would probably demonstrate usb3's speed quite effectively.
Calculating a 100mb/sec average (approx the max speed of a modern 10'000 rpm sata 2 disk) 2 Tb (2000 Gb) would take 2000/100 = 20 secs to transfer. That's impressive.
Omg, I mean 200 secs, 3 min 20 sec. Sorry.
Wtf, I usually don't fail this hard.
2'000 Gb = 2'000'000 Mb
2'000'000/100 = 20'000 sec = almost 6 hours. I hope.
Yea, that was pretty hardcore failing...
2 Terabytes in binary = 1024^4 = 1,099,511,627,776 bytes x2 = 2,199,023,255,552 bytes
100 Megabytes in binary = 1024^2 = 1,048,576 bytes x100 = 104,857,600 bytes
2,199,023,255,552 / 104,857,600 *-1sec = 20,972 seconds = 349 minutes = 5 hours 49 minutes
I wonder what Usb will be called, Ultra Speed?
* Usb 4
Goddamn typos.
SuperMegaMaxispeed USB.
Obviously.
Actually....it would be called hyperspeed, but who's counting?
That would be "Ultra Speed certified USB"
Pretty sure USB 4 is approaching ludicrous speed.
you might want to proofread first before posting :P
and when USB 4 finally come out, the data it's transferring would approaching ludicrously large.
Ludicrous Speed!!!!!!!!!!
I think you'll find it's god-speed.
Are there any hard drive solutions, ssd in some sort of raid array perhaps, that could even attain 5GB/s? It is going to be difficult to max this spec out.
Oh excuse me, 5 Gb/s
Well, first of all, that 4.8 Gbps is a theoretical signaling rate, so more likely it will max out around ~3.5-4.0. Even at 4.0 Gbps, that is 500MB/sec. with traditional harddrives, you would need a significant RAID system to max that out, probably five disks or more. However, with SSDs it's a whole other story. Intel's 80/160GB X-25 SSDs (the lower-end MLC version) max out at around 230MB/sec read speed, so a pair of those would probably come close to saturating the connection...
http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2008/09/10/review_intel_x_25m_ssd/page3.html
good
Why bother with usb 3? we have Esata right now for storage. usb 2 for slower external stuff. Right?
but why not?
But for everything else? Your soon-to-be-superfast wifi usb-modem, your external graphic-card? That's what Usb will enable and that's the reason for Usb 3. Well not just those, but any data-intensive general external appliance.
Do we still need external power supply for this?