Here's a little something
OCZ Technology cooked up just for
CeBIT: a PCIe enclosure that'll contain 1TB worth of SSD storage with maximum read rates of up to 600MB/sec and maximum write speeds of up to 500MB/sec. Oh, and the sustained write speeds are right around 400MB/sec. Essentially, this device will contain four 256GB MLC-based OCZ SSDs along with 256MB of ECC DDR2 RAM; when slapped in one's desktop, they can choose to set it up as the boot disk or a slave. OCZ is also hoping to offer a 4TB edition by the end of the year, which is totally plausible given that 1TB SSDs are
already a reality. The on-hand demo was just a mockup shell, but the finalized version shouldn't look much different than what's pictured in the gallery below. As for pricing and availability? It should hit the US of A in around six weeks for somewhere between $1,500 and $2,000. It's high-end, y'all.
When is the contest to give one of THESE away?
pretty sure if one of these came into the engadget office, the first person to see the box would be the contest winner
yeah, that sure will fix the economy.
This thing must hungry for power, global warming is gonna worsen
"This thing must hungry for power, global warming is gonna worsen"
A) The phrase is now 'climate change'
B) SSDs typically use a lot less power than hard drives. This card even with 4 drives inside likely uses less than one normal hard disk,
"pretty sure if one of these came into the engadget office, the first person to see the box would be the contest winner"
Yeah, because there's totally an 8x PCIe slot in a MacBook Pro or iPhone :D
@eggothewaffle You sir, win 1 internet.
@eggothewaffle
You sir hit the nail on the head. +1
@eggothewaffle
No, but that would be a pretty reason to invest in a Mac Pro if they didn't already have one.
@eggothewaffle
lol
Holy fuck. Want.
HOLY...SOMEONE PUT SH*T IN MY PANTS!!
is that case spray painted?
Looks like pre-seasoned cast iron cookware to me.
^ that CANT be good for head dissipation =\
Yes, do not want to dissipate too much head...
damn.......heat ..i meant heat =\
Brings back memories of the old "Hard drive on an ISA card" cards.
OK, so PCI-E interface for connection to the motherboard? Mobo manufacturers are going to have to rewrite their BIOSs to accomodating Boot to PCI Express, not to mention getting your OS installer to recognize that your HD is attached to a PCI Bus. I dont see it being around for long and i just see it as a proof of concept that you can make a 1TB hard drive array with enough SSD drives.
That's not an issue Setnev. This is basically a PCIe RAID card with the hard drives already on the card itself.
It'll detect as a drive and boot up just like any other PCIe RAID card.
Setnev: There's been BIOS support for this card since 1981 - if you could adapt a PCIe card to a 1981 IBM PC, it'd work, thanks to the option ROM facility IBM designed into the BIOS way back then. This is how you can add a SATA card to a machine, or you can boot from ethernet or a RAID controller, it just uses an option ROM.
Sane? I guess you're rich too huh....
This looks like the fusion i/o thing...for $1500 i think i may actually buy one of these. HDD data access is the one thing that you routinely wait around for on a computer these days.
LOL... I think I'd rather buy a $100 1TB spinner, wait a few extras second for a program to load, and keep the other $1400.
does that actually fit into computer cases? because it sure wouldn't fit into mine.
Looks about the size of my BFS 9800GTX+ which BARELY fits in my PC
My thoughts exactly! That is way too big even if it does have 4 SSDs inside. I'm sure they could be a bit more efficient with the space. When you buy something like that - you don't need the added worry of if it will fit. They really need to overhaul the size down a bit. Hopefully that will happen by v2 or v3 when the price will also be reduced - if no one else is selling them by then.
OMGWTFBBQ i'm going to put two of these in my rig for Far Cry 2
I wasn't aware that Far Cry 2 needed 2TB of disc space with 600MB/s read speed...
Because a large hard drive will dramatically increase your graphics output.
:|
wow..... its like 1988 all over again!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardcard
http://wiki.museo8bits.es/wiki/images/thumb/6/6b/Hardcard.jpg/300px-Hardcard.jpg
Looks like painted balsawood
This is definitely a hand made prototype model. Probably they are waiting on tooled plastic parts to come in and they whipped up this chipboard crap-box for the show.
I'll stick with my old-fashioned HDD until these SSD prices get remotely affordable.
Actually, the ultra-fast OCZ Vertex is not that expensive... like $3 per GB
Hmm maybe this would boot vista in 10 seconds or less?
10 seconds? This would boot Vista before you thought about turning on your computer.
Probably would boot before you even knew what Vista was.
Possibly even before you were born.
no. its physically, chemically, and biologically impossible to do such a task
Good question.
My guess is it would make less difference than you think. The BIOS would still take 20 seconds before you got the initial boot up when this would engage. It would speed the later part up some, but all of the DHCP, driver initialization, etc etc stuff would still take however long it takes.
I'd love for somebody to find out though.
Would be nice if one of those hard core sites like ExtremeTech or Tom's Hardware or whatever would actually do testing like that, e.g. a completely fake "hard disk" made from RAM and a battery that would be faster than any hard disk ever will be--then test things like boot time, application launch, etc and see what kind of difference the hard disk performance can make.
Seen it done with windows xp .. booting from a ramdisk in less than 10 sec.
http://video.aol.com/video-detail/insane-8-second-windows-xp-bootup-ram-disk/1807776156
Nope, it won't.
I have 4 OCZ Core V2 SSD 30GB drives in quad RAID 0. Average read speed I have on the Core i7 system o/c-ed to 4GHz are 489 MB/s. Vista or Win 7 beta boots in 18 seconds (not counting BIOS posting etc).
Z Drive is only 22% faster, plus there is some time during boot attributed to pure CPU work (system working on starting services etc). At best, the Z Drive will boot in 14 seconds.
Goodbye gigabyte I-Ram, Hello...OCZ...whatever it's called...
When I read about the fusion I/O device a few months back, I got really excited. Recently I specced 4x SSD drives and a hardware RAID controller at New Egg for really fast read/write speeds on my Workstation. I chose four 30GB drives ($100/ea) and a nice Areca controller ($300) for a 120GB rig that could read and write about 400-600MB per second. To get this 1GB rig for $1500 is actually a crazy good bargain, cause my idea would have cost me $700 and it would have had only 1/8 the storage capacity. Plus, its nice to have it all packaged into one device without any wires.
Count me in when these come out. And hopefully they make a 0.5TB version for half as much.
" To get this 1GB rig for $1500 is actually a crazy good bargain,"
Read that again after 5 years.
Actually, read that again now, you said 1GB.
Not all GB are the same. For high-bandwidth functions (like saving a 2GB photoshop file) it sucks to wait minutes when it could take seconds. I would pay $1000 for 30GB of storage if it were high enough speed. Buying a $100 harddrive that writes 50MB/sec isn't worth it to me.
In two years when SATA is dead and data is running through the PCI-E lanes, I'll be a happy camper. Imagine having 4 of these cards in RAID-5 and having 3GB of secure data with 1.5GB/sec write speeds. I'd pay an arm and leg for that.
and yes, TB is the right size.
That price will be 1/2 this time next year, and it'll still be too expensive. But that's okay, because eventually I suspect no one will want revolving platters to store sensitive archives. Another 5 years and we're kosher.
Are these effected by violent acts of shouting?
But can they load Crysis?
With hardware of this calibre becoming a reality, comments like yours will soon be redundant.
Or they'll release Crysis 2....