Switched On: An 'i' for imaging
Each week Ross Rubin contributes Switched On, a column about consumer technology.

That's changed with iPhone 4. While its five-megapixel camera lags behind the eight-megapixel cameras on devices such as the Droid Incredible and HTC EVO 4G in terms of raw resolution, and it includes just one LED flash bulb as opposed to two on the EVO 4G, Apple's inclusion of a backlit sensor has aided the product's low-light capture, and the included software makes use of the cameras in innovative ways.
But as is often the case with Apple, the hardware is only part of the story. iMovie and FaceTime show that Cupertino seeks to push the envelope of what can be done in real-time using the iPhone's cameras, as well as what can be done with video after it's been captured. Using iMovie for iPhone, one will be able to create a reasonably polished multimedia memento that wraps HD video, five-megapixel stills and a soundtrack in high-quality titles and transitions. You'll be able to finish the vacation video before the vacation is even over.
The iPhone is expanding far beyond content consumption -- a role into which many have been tempted to pigeonhole smartphones and slate devices in general. |
During his WWDC keynote, Steve Jobs said it took 18 months to develop iMovie for iPhone. That Apple is now lavishing attention on video functionality it practically ignored before shows that the iPhone is expanding far beyond the content consumption role -- a role many have been tempted to pigeonhole smartphones and slate devices in general. It also fans the flames of opinion that Apple is turning iOS into an eventual replacement for Mac OS. iMovie was the first of the iLife applications, and of course the iWork suite has already been ported to iOS. Apple's imaging moves also show some of the strength that Apple is building in its iCosystem. It would be trivial to create a version of iMovie optimized for the iPad, and getting videos from the iPhone to iPad is a simple exercise with the (currently rare) iPad camera connector. The next step is a simpler path to the television that may be facilitated by a future version of Apple TV.
Of course, these video vindications are currently limited to the iPhone. The next test of Apple's commitment to developing its handheld platforms into robust digital imaging devices will likely happen this fall as Apple refreshes the iPod touch. Many have long speculated that that device -- previously described as not needing "new stuff" by Jobs -- was destined to include a camera. But now the indications are stronger than ever that Apple will imbue its music player-turned-mobile platform into a carrier-free vehicle for bridging the space of face-to-face communications and the time between capturing video and editing it.
Ross Rubin is executive director of industry analysis for consumer technology at market research and analysis firm The NPD Group. Views expressed in Switched On are his own.





















i know i am getting it are you?
@allenade Me and my evo are sitting pretty
Count me in.
@The Geek Alright to be honest with you, I am getting iphone cuz evo sold out at my local sprint store :(
@allenade
Yup. 3GS sold on eBay already. :D
@allenade If the Evo was never invented & iPhone 4 was on a better network & didn't look dated, I would consider it...
@allenade
This reminds me of one of those other editorial posts awhile back on Engadget arguing that the iPad was an adequate laptop replacement for business users. Just like then - my response is the same for this. Because you CAN do something on a device doesn't mean that you should.
It's great to be able to do basic editing on your phone but is that really a priority? I think video generally falls into one of two categories. You either are shooting something and uploading (uncut) OR you are putting together something with some polish. In which case you need some decent video editing software. Transitions, music, cutting, text, etc.
In the first case any video camera on a cell phone will do. You shoot the video and hit upload. In the 2nd case I want to do that work on my computer. I don't want to perform editing on a 3.5" screen. It's too cumbersome. Again, it's like using a device for email. I can bang out a lengthy email on my iPod Touch BUT I never would. If my response is more than a few paragraphs I wait until I have a full size keyboard.
Kudos to Apple to upping the hardware and offering the software for a nominal charge. I just bet that the software isn't used much. People will be much more inclined to use iMovie on their Macs.
@bjsguess
Who moved my cheese?
@who said what
Btw, Ross, I liked the way you coined the term iCosystem. I don't know if you snapped it up from somewhere... but it works well.
@bjsguess
I don't think iMovie is aimed at pro's, just enthusiasts and casual users (check the $4.99 tag). But I do agree with you... editing on that device doesn't seem smart.
@bjsguess Final Cut Pro and Premiere FTW
@bjsguess
For people like me who do not have a $2000 computer but want iMovie software, the new iPhone is freaking awesome. Most iPhone users have windows PCs, and I look forward to publishing HD videos with iMovie themes and effects on YouTube, directly from the phone.
@allenade
Hell yeah bro. But seriously, yes I will be getting one of these. It's so pretty! Haha. Good phone, I'm happy for apple. Remember everyone, it's a phone. I don't know if I'm on this boat of have my phone be boss in EVERYTHING. 8 megapixels? Dual flash? More thing of course, but I just like it simple and easy. Well done apple.
@allenade
I don't understand this. How come Apple products rate apologetic and defensive sounding articles where other people try to use the square-pig-in-a-round-hole technique to justify why a iThing is so much better even though it doesnt have the necessary specs?
How come HTC, Google, Nokia, RIM don't rate such kind of devotional articles? The Big J really knows his flock, huh? He is truly a messiah since he can mesmerize the masses!
@allenade
iphone has not hit the market yet and ross is already talking about the awesomeness of the camera.
evo has 8MP cam, 2 led flash and backlight sensor and u found iphone cam better which has 5MP cam, 1led flash and backlight sensor?
@bjsguess You make a lot of good points, but the thing is, not everyone has a Mac; therefore, not everyone will go and edit it on their computer if they don't have access to a cheap and easy video editor. iMovie is 5 bucks for the iPhone, and it's arguably better than the latest iteration of Windows Movie Maker for Windows PCs. Personally, I would never edit a video on anything other than a machine that has Premiere Pro or Final Cut, but I forget that not everyone has access to such software, and this kind of stuff will actually be very useful to teens.
@coolkams03
What the he'll is the purpose of two led flash's anyways? Looks tacky and cheap and I can promise I wouldn't EVER be jealous of android camera specs. What a joke. The only thing I take out of android is the rainbow bubbles wallpaper the evo is advertised with. Otherwise, I am in love with the forbidden phone. (iPhone)
@dan325013 I think what you guys forget is the complexity of these programs to regular users. iMovie on the iPhone looked soo easy my sister could do it...
@allenade comparing crap quality vs crap quality, doesn't matter to me. Want to see good quality phone camera, get Nokia N8. They are photo quality is way better those from HTC, Apple, and Motorola but always lack the hype. No one knows
@PCG If Google could manage making a video editing app for Android there's no way in hell Android fans would complain over how unnecessary or impractical it is.
@coolkams03
1. you shouldn't even say your camera has a backside illuminated sensor, low light pictures is one of the biggest evo's complaints.
2 leds flash is not that special, the new thing is xenon which none of the phones have
3. 5MP vs 8MP is not the best argument - the pixels could be in different sizes and thus different qualities
the point of this argument is to show the excellent combination of software and hardware accomplished by apple.
example: apple has normal 1400 milliamp battery, excellent power management software -> great, longer lasting battery life
htc stuffs a 1500 milliamp (largest battery) and everyone complains of bad battery life (on 4G + 3G)
If anything, the EVO has proven that having "dream specs" does not equate to the best phone, or even a great one at that.
@dan325013
How do you know that? It's unreleased software...and WMM is actually pretty damn good for quick, easy edits.
Of course, it's not fancy, but still: desktop video editing program > iphone video editing program. Especially since, like I said, WMM is actually pretty good.
@bjsguess
Even for simple stuff, I don't think a camera on a phone will cut it. It's a solution for the really lazy or something that works because of the convenience factor and because you always have your phone. However, for anyone that cares about the end result a phone (any phone) makes a crap camera.
This might change eventually. Today, you only use a camera if you don't really give a d*mn about your results.
@dan325013 -- "Personally, I would never edit a video on anything other than a machine that has Premiere Pro or Final Cut, but I forget that not everyone has access to such software, and this kind of stuff will actually be very useful to teens."
You could also say you'd rather take pictures with a DSLR and never with a cellphone camera. But sometimes the best camera is the one you have with you.
You can already trim a clip with the iPhone right now. Adding a little more editing possibilities can't hurt.
I shoot professionally with a Panasonic DVX100. That said... sometime I shoot things with my cellphone for fun.
Giving you another reason not to use your Windows Movie Maker!
@Almo Im thinking about selling my trusty 3gs too... how much did u get?
@allenade
Yes. Now you know that I am getting it too.
@coolkams03
I bought an Evo on launch day and one of the MOST unimpressive features is undoubtedly the camera. I won't even get started on the video recording capabilities (or lack thereof).. Don't get so caught up on mega pixel ratings, they're simply one small slice of the pie that creates a good picture.
I don't mean to sound condescending in any way but it would serve you well to read up on digital imaging so you don't get caught up so easily in B.S. marketing.
@allenade
I've literally been using iPhones since the first day they were launched and upgraded every year but because of my business I also have a line with Sprint and I bought an Evo on launch day after hearing about it so much on the blog scene.
After my experience with the phone I felt really strongly about taking the time to review it so everyone else can hopefully see it before they buy one.
Here's the first half: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3XkTN4NHG8
iDont like your iCosystem, Apple paid article
@bjsguess Who said it was a priority? Apple is selling the App in the appstore for $5.99. If it was a priority, I think they would have included it in iOS 4, no? It's not in the software pack, so obviously they figured, some may want it, others may not.
But, also, many record a video and want to edit the video lightly. Trimming the video isn't always what people want to do on the go. I know some piers of mine that don't like to trim certain parts of a video, so, if they upload to youtube, they end up sending the entire video. What's wrong with introducing a system that makes it easy to lightly edit a video. Not every video needs to be professionally done, and the demo of iMovie was a perfect example. Maybe you should watch the video. It sums up the type of purpose iMovie serves.
@dkeith95
i second that statement...thumbs up...point proven...period
@dkeith95
Xenon is not a new thing. My N95 has had xenon for over three years now
@Android looks Hacked Together iMovie isn't the standard. Final Cut is
@bjsguess I wonder what your reaction would be had Microsoft or Google been first to put video editing on a phone.
@engadget
"The iPhone is expanding far beyond content consumption..."
commercial moments? ... live from engadget!
Why I feel - reading this - that Apple is the love of your life?
There are other phones... you know that.... no???
@naashak I totally agree. The iPhone is a great device, but the new one looks like the Microsoft Zune from last year and Engadget and other ripped it a new one. Seems like they grade Apple products on a curve and give them credit for things that other phones already have. For instance, in the first generation of the iPhone, they gave Apple a pass on the fact that the phone didn't have the simple feature of cut & paste, but when they finally added that feature, it was as if Apple invented the next great thing.
@iPhonemyphone
Considering it's 2 months old (but perfectly mint condition, scratchless + unused accessories) and I purchased it for £350 from my mate who didn't want it as an upgrade phone.. I got £420 on it on eBay minus about £20 in paypal fees and postage. Which I suppose is fair enough, since it's £440 brand new right now!! So £400 net add £100-150 should be able to snap up the iPhone 4 comfortably. /grin :)
"When the original iPhone was first launched, its camera ranked among its least competitive features."
Let's be honest, it still is.
@coolkams03
Megapixel do NOT make a camera take better pics, the quality of the sensor and lens is 90% of it. And megapixels just makes the photo larger. I have a Fuji F-10 camera with 3.2mp thats 5 years old and takes better photos than my wifes 12mp Nikon and my daughters 8mp canon, because like today, Fuji still goes or quality and low light capabilities and not megapixels. iPhone is the same.
@allenade I'm most definitely getting one next month. Unlocked and no contract. :) Evo 4G need not apply.
@anothernerd
Thank you so much for the review. It really gave me a deeper insight on what to get. Btw, you should get google voice so you can have 2 # on 1 phone!
@naashak
There is more to a phone than just a list of features.
http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/09/iphone-4-missing-features/
@iPhonemyphone
i sold my 16GB 3GS for $375 on eBay.
@bjsguess I mean in reality do we even NEED any of these "smart phones" I mean I have gotten every iPhone sold so far (All 3) and plan to get the new one. But do I need them? Noooo. But I want them because they work dang good.
Same with this. I don't need to edit videos on my iPhone. But I am sure that as soon as people get the iPhone 4, iMovie will be the best selling App for it. Just like I don't type documents on my iPad for real but I bought iWork as soon as I could just in case I want to type a document in the future.
Apple knows this. And the iMovie app seems to work nice and easy so people will buy it and that is all that matters to Apple. That people buy their products.
@coolkams03 Mega-pixels do not indicate higher quality shots. Software is also very important in digital quality and usability. That said, I have yet to use the new iPhone's camera and app, so I can not defend Apple's case for quality and usability.
@allenade They are doing so because they can see you "upgrades" every year. Don't try to put up a grand reason for Apple, Engadget! They could have just included the camera of iPhone 4 into the first iPhone but they didn't want to cuz they wouldn't have enough "ungraded" components in later version in that way.
@dkeith95 True, in an article comparing the Nexus One and the HTC Incredible's camera, didn't the HTC Incredible (also 8mp) get pwned by the Nexus One's 5mp camera? Whats even funnier about this is that there both made by HTC.
@jounihat
N95 never had xenon. It must be the n82 you are talkin about or you are just trolling.
@Michael Scrip kudos. i love my photography but i can't always be lugging my gear around. the best camera IS the one that is on you. photography is about moments. capturing moments. and i agree with the megapixels issue. hello? hasn't anyone realized how incredibly overrated megapixels are? it's only useful if it goes hand in hand with a good sensor. that's why at the height of the megapixel race companies that were pushing 12mpx cameras STILL couldn't get photos as good as some of the lower mpx cameras. one of the all-time classics, the fujifilm f31fd proves that. i'd rather have a great camera (even in my phone) with lower mpx but takes better photos than a showoff camera with lousy photo-taking quality. that said, the iphone camera has not been proven yet, but honestly i'm taking pretty good photos right now with the 3GS. low-light performance isn't great, though, which is why i'm hoping this backlit sensor will improve things.