February 21st 2010 3:03 am

Critic reviews

6.0
1 review
  • Sharpness
    6.0
  • Build quality
  • Durability
  • Size and weight
    6.0

sort by

User reviews

8.5
2 reviews
6.0
PC Mag Jul 15, 2013

The Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM lens is an inexpensive alternative to the 16-35mm f/2.8, but its edges are muddy at its widest angle.

Read the full review →
9.0
MtnSloth MtnSloth

If you are willing to pay twice as much and if the size and weight won't bother you, the Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM is the better lens. Likewise, if you refuse to carry a tripod, then the 16-35mm is the better choice. Either lens wipes the floor with any of the sub-35mm prime lenses from...

Read the full review →

How it stacks up

Instantly compare the Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM side by side with some of the top devices on Engadget!

Compare these

Other Canon camera lenses

Don't forget to check out these other devices by Canon, you might find something good!

See all Canon camera lenses