lawuit

Latest

  • Feb 17, 2020 Lathrop / CA / USA - Tesla Factory casting foundry facilities close to Stockton;

    Judge affirms jury's verdict in Tesla racism lawsuit but reduces $137 million payout

    by 
    Mariella Moon
    Mariella Moon
    04.14.2022

    A federal judge has reduced the damages awarded to Owen Diaz to $15 million.

  • Fred Prouser / Reuters

    Disney sues Redbox for reselling DVD download codes

    by 
    Timothy J. Seppala
    Timothy J. Seppala
    12.01.2017

    Disney isn't too happy with Redbox at the moment. The short-term movie rental service has been selling the download codes that come with the Disney discs it buys and subsequently lends out to customers. The Wall Street Journal reports that unlike other studios, Redbox doesn't have a distribution deal in place with Disney and as a result, it has to buy discs at retail. Then, it sells the download slips to customers at its kiosks for between $7.99 and $14.99.

  • AT&T sues LG, Samsung, others alleging LCD price-fixing 'conspiracy'

    by 
    Chris Ziegler
    Chris Ziegler
    10.21.2009

    A cellphone without an LCD isn't much of a cellphone. Alright, yes, there are exceptions to the rule, but generally speaking, LCDs still rule the industry, which makes it a ripe target for nefarious price-fixing schemes to take root -- something that LG and Sharp are well-acquainted with coming off a stinging half-billion dollar verdict last year. All the talk of artificially inflated display pricing recently must've spooked AT&T, because they've gone ahead and filed a lawsuit in San Francisco today alleging that LG, Samsung, Chunghua, AU Optronics, and others all conspired to boost component prices during a period in which the carrier bought some 300 million handsets. That's a boatload of phones -- several times AT&T's total subscriber base -- and we're guessing the result could be a significant cash outlay if they're successful with the suit. Does this mean free Mythics for everyone? [Via Phone Scoop]

  • The Daily Quest: Forsooth and what not!

    by 
    Adam Holisky
    Adam Holisky
    06.04.2009

    We here at WoW.com are on a Daily Quest to bring you interesting, informative and entertaining WoW-related links from around the blogosphere. Etherjammer has an old but quite humorous look at BlizzCon etiquette. My favorite line: "Use spells such as Slow Fall and Levitate to go from one level of BlizzCon to another at your own risk, as players report that these spells have been unreliable at best in past BlizzCons." Why? Because some idiot jumped off the escalator half way up last year, and it caused quite a ruckus. Pardo was near the esclator talking with some folks, and he just looked and shook his head in a /facepalm manner. Activision-Blizzard is suing Double Fine over Brutal Legend. Guild halls and player housing. Love 'em or hate 'em, lots of people want them. The Hunter's Union has an interesting take on them. Casual Raid Leader has a great post about encouraging more oraganic and communicative raiding. Stoneybaby of Big Hit Box has a good review of how he got back into PvP, which would be useful for those of you looking to do the same. Notice how we've linked Big Hit Box a lot this week? It's because they're producing great content for the community! If you're writing compelling content or come across a great site or blog post, please let us know! Click here to submit a link to TDQ

  • Judge declares mistrial in RIAA filesharing case, sets aside $222,000 verdict

    by 
    Nilay Patel
    Nilay Patel
    09.25.2008

    We always thought that the RIAA's first-ever filesharing trial victory against Jammie Thomas was a little suspect since the labels weren't required to prove that Thomas even had Kazaa installed on her machine or was the person using the account in question, and it looks like the court agrees -- it's just declared a mistrial and set aside the $222,000 judgment on the grounds that simply making copyrighted works available for download does not constitute copyright infringement. That's a huge decision -- the "making available" theory is the basis for most of the RIAA's legal arguments -- and it means that the RIAA will now have to prove the unauthorized transfer of each song it wants to collect damages on at the new trial. We'll see what effect this has in the broader sense -- we've got a feeling we're in for a slew of appellate decisions on both sides of the "making available" debate -- but for now it looks like the good guys are finally starting to score some points. [Via ZDNet, thanks JagsLive] Read - Wired article Read - Decision [PDF]