According to Something Awful, 2005 was not a
good year for gaming journalism. In fact, they reckon it was a terrible year, and they've picked the five
worst gaming articles to exemplify just how abysmal game journalism has become. Not limiting themselves to 2005, the
two worst articles in their lineup are both by the same author and neither is actually from 2005; in Something Awful's
words, the reviews are so "horrible that they have transcended the limitations of linear time".Among the lineup is Kieron Gillen, who's responded to the article on his own site. The traits identified by Something Awful that make these particular reviews so bad include, but are not limited to: rampant fanboyism, an awful sense of humour, pretentiousness, spending much of the review not talking about the actual game, spending the entire review failing to describe the game, and being Tim Rogers. A useful checklist of things to avoid when reviewing games.
[Thanks, anonymous]
