What we learn next is that it's not the FBI saying that iPods lead to crime; it's two researchers at the Urban Institute, analyzing the FBI's data that shows a rise in robberies (theft + violence or intimidation) compared to a decline in overall thefts since 2005 (when, say the authors of the study, the iPod began to hit the mass market in volume). More from the article: "A telltale sign that iPods... are at the root of the troubling trend is that juvenile robbery arrests climbed 18% last year after a 44% decline during the previous decade... 'People carry less cash now because of check cards and the big jewelry fad has faded," [the researcher] said. "[IPods] are the only explanation of why this crime spike is happening now."
You can read more from the Urban Institute report at their website; for a gimlet-eyed look at the overall FBI numbers, head over to the Freakonomics blog. The UI report is somewhat more reserved than the News (surprise!) and it acknowledges that the hypothesis of an iCrime-wave is based on anecdotal evidence and not on strong, causal statistical evidence. Still, it points a firm finger in the direction of the iPod and suggests that some simple changes, from situational awareness to iPod-tracking capabilities, could reduce the level of iPod crime. At least they aren't calling for an outright ban or installing spyware and calling it theft prevention.
Meanwhile, on Staten Island, the News is reporting that "iMom" was not about to let the theft of her son's iPod go unchallenged. Davida Montano is charged with assault after attacking the thief, apparently stabbing him with the shards of his own glasses (believe me, Staten Island is a tough place to be a geek). The 19-year old thief apparently robbed Montano's son of his iPod, videogame consoles and an $80 sweater, but of course we know what gets the headline.
What's your iPod crime theory? Are they the Air Jordans of the new millennium, or a shortcut for lazy headline writers?