Latest in Gaming

Image credit:

Designing WoW: It takes a village -- no, a city

Scott Helfand
02.19.14
Share
Tweet
Share
Save

Sponsored Links

Thanks to major events like BlizzCon, as well as an uncanny level of visibility in public forums, interviews and on Twitter, we tend to think of WoW as a personal project run by a very small number of people. Chris Metzen, Tom Chilton, Greg "Ghostcrawler" Street -- these folks have received a fair amount of the praise, and virtually all of the blame, for nearly every good and bad thing we perceive about the game. And when a change is implemented that we don't understand or disagree with, too many of us often tend to think, "How could they be so stupid?"

The answer, a lot more often than we may be willing to realize, is: The people who make WoW happen are far, far greater in number than the few we see publicly -- and they're just as human as the rest of us.

In the wake of sad news in the gaming world -- Irrational Games, the company that brought us BioShock Infinite, is going poof -- we've been given an important reminder of how huge the gulf can be between our perception of who makes a game come to life and the realities of dame design.



An unusual press release from Irrational cofounder Ken Levine sparked this discussion. Brendan Keogh wrote a poignant op-ed yesterday in The Conversation about that press release and used it to make some really key points that also apply to WoW, along with any other large game (MMO or otherwise). Here's a snippet:

Often, when we play a game and lament about an obviously terrible design decision in one stage and ask nobody in particular "Urgh, why would they design it like that?" the answer isn't that the creators were idiots, but something much more mundane such as: two level designers worked on different floors of the studio, or a post-it note fell off a monitor.

That doesn't excuse a poor design decisions, of course, but I think it is worth understanding and appreciating the very real and often straightforward reasons why something is the way it is: because this thing was made by a large team of dispersed and imperfect humans under actual, boring constraints.

WoW exists on a scale that is absolutely unprecedented in the history of computer gaming: It's a forever-evolving, online universe played by millions, and that requires hundreds of people working full-time (and then some) to keep it functioning and growing. That takes not just a massive amount of resources, but also a stunningly huge level of communication and coordination to ensure that the thousands upon thousands of individual little cogs that make up our WoW experience work as close to perfect as possible.

But we're not Borg. We're human. We're imperfect. And despite our best efforts, stuff happens, or changes need to be reverted.

That doesn't mean we should be complacent when we see mistakes happen. But it also doesn't mean that a problem happened on purpose, or that a change we dislike wasn't thought through, or that the people who bring WoW to us are lazy or negligent or don't play the game or don't care about us players. Odds are really good that the opposite of all that is true. It's just that they're human, like us, and sometimes they (and we) mess up.

This isn't meant to be an apologist rant intended to curb the amount of vitriol that's flung at WoW's most visible designers. I realize this is likely to be interpreted that way -- we're a fansite blog, after all -- but that's not the intent. Nor am I seeking to deflect attention from the realities of our economy and the pressure for gaming companies to make ever-increasing amounts of money.

It's just that, as we bid farewell to Irrational and wish the best for the dozens of people whose lives (and families) have been thrown into chaos due to its closing, it feels like a good time to remind ourselves that these games we play for our own entertainment are put together by living, breathing people. Many of them were once -- and, in the case of Irrational, are once again -- just like we are: Avid gamers who wanted a chance to make something they believe in, and hoped that other gamers out there would enjoy playing as much as they enjoyed creating it.



All products recommended by Engadget are selected by our editorial team, independent of our parent company. Some of our stories include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, we may earn an affiliate commission.
Comment
Comments
Share
Tweet
Share
Save

Popular on Engadget

Recommended Reading: A year later, the CRISPR babies are still a mystery

Recommended Reading: A year later, the CRISPR babies are still a mystery

View
Hitting the Books: How police tech reinforces America's racial segregation

Hitting the Books: How police tech reinforces America's racial segregation

View
Blackmagic’s ATEM Mini brings broadcast quality to your YouTube and Twitch streams

Blackmagic’s ATEM Mini brings broadcast quality to your YouTube and Twitch streams

View
The Morning After: One last update for Google Glass Explorer Edition

The Morning After: One last update for Google Glass Explorer Edition

View
Noir detective game 'Blacksad' will be out for consoles on December 10th

Noir detective game 'Blacksad' will be out for consoles on December 10th

View

From around the web

Page 1Page 1ear iconeye iconFill 23text filevr