Latest in Tomorrow

Image credit: Rutgers

Blood-drawing robot is supposedly more accurate than humans

Guided by ultrasound, it hit a vein 87 percent of the time.
1409 Shares
Share
Tweet
Share

Sponsored Links

Rutgers

The only thing worse than getting a needle is getting two (or more) when the first jab attempt fails. Now, researchers from Rutgers and Mount Sinai Hospital have developed a robot that can see under your skin and supposedly do the job better than humans. That could one day help reduce problems like infections and thrombosis when attempting to start an IV line, for example.

It's relatively easy to draw blood from a patient with easy-to-access veins, but much harder for patients without visible or palpable veins, and particularly with emaciated patients. In those cases, staff might have to resort to using an ultrasound machine to see veins more clearly.

The blood-sampling robot just skips straight to that step, using built-in ultrasound tech to guide the placement of the needle. The complete system also includes a module to handle samples and a centrifuge-based blood analyzer.

With easy to access veins, the machine can successfully draw blood 97 percent of the time, and had an overall success rate of 87 percent for 31 participants, the researchers said. According to the report, clinicians fail between 27 and 60 percent of the time for patients with difficult-to-access veins, depending on the nature of the problem. As a Redditor pointed out, however, the machine seems to have a lower success rate than medical personnel for difficult-to-access veins, other than for emaciated folks.

The robot is still a prototype and researchers could potentially improve its success rate, though. It could one day be used in ambulances, besides and emergency rooms for procedures like IV catheterization, dialysis and placing arterial lines. "A device like ours could help clinicians get blood samples quickly, safely and reliably, preventing unnecessary complications and pain in patients from multiple needle insertion attempts," said lead author Josh Leipheimer.

All products recommended by Engadget are selected by our editorial team, independent of our parent company. Some of our stories include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, we may earn an affiliate commission.
Comment
Comments
Share
1409 Shares
Share
Tweet
Share

Popular on Engadget

The best smart locks

The best smart locks

View
After Math: Stunning figures

After Math: Stunning figures

View
Next version of Chrome brings web AR and NFC to more users

Next version of Chrome brings web AR and NFC to more users

View
Strava now syncs workout data from your Apple Watch

Strava now syncs workout data from your Apple Watch

View
Ring footage might not be very useful for catching criminals

Ring footage might not be very useful for catching criminals

View

From around the web

Page 1Page 1ear iconeye iconFill 23text filevr