Looks like the
Alpha's what we thought it'd be after all -- and everybody waiting for
Sony's first official DSLR need not wait (much) longer. Really, there's nothing much in the
Alpha A100 we weren't already speculating based on the previous specs reported on the interwebs, but at least now the details are a little more fleshed out: its 10.2 megapixel sensor is a Super HAD (Hole Accumulated Diode) CCD with Super SteadyShot OIS, anti-dust filters and vibration, and Bionz Image Processor hardware; the camera also features the Minolta A-lens mount (of course), a 2.5-inch anti-reflective display, 3fps burst mode, 600 shot lithium-ion Stamina battery,CF and Memory Stick Pro Duo (via CF adapter), and a sweet feature that initiates autofocus when you look into the viewfinder (so you don't have to waste time with the half-press). Not bad, but we're honestly a little worried about the price up in this piece. We'll keep ya posted.
Update: and the price! $999, "expected to ship on or before July 28th, 2006" according to the
SonyStyle page. Oh, and DP Blog also has some
sweet info on the 20 or so lenses announced for this thing as well, better check that out before you make any buying decisions. There you have it ladies and gents, enjoy. Thanks, Steve.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
nuggetbro @ Jun 8th 2006 2:04AM
That is going to be one freeking sweet camera, specially if I can use my older Minolta lenses on it. I got to say, there are alot of Sony hatters out there, but they do make some rock solid products.
marquis wilson @ Apr 17th 2007 2:10PM
Hi I am new to this site, and very amature.
Your blog mentioned using old Minolta lenses on the Sony A100...
Do you know if my old Konica FT-1 lenses would work also???
Is there another less expensive brand of digital camera that would support my FT-1 lenses??
Thank you for your comments/advice
Marquis
mpeng @ Jun 13th 2006 2:19PM
where's the mention of dpreview's hands on review and samples...
Ryan Block @ Jun 13th 2006 2:27PM
Uh, here? http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/09/sony-dslr-a100-p-review-roundup/
Best, Ryan
Jasper @ Sep 5th 2006 1:59AM
I am completely torn about which camera to get as my first SLR. Originally I was looking at the Olympus Evolt 500 in comparison to the Rebel XT. Now I am completely thrown off base with the new XTI and Nikon D80 released. But I am also looking into the Sony A100 now, because of its image stabalizing system, which Canon and Nikon do not provide. But since it's Sony's first SLR, I don't know if I can trust it. I also heard that the Nikon has an ISO of up to 3200 with a boost. But I am not sure what this "boost" means or why it's necessary to have at all. I need help. Also, the Nikon doesn't have a dust cleanser, which I think is appealing considering that these cameras are so similar. To me, the Canon seems like a trustworthy product especially with its lower price. But I hear a lot of complaints about the way it feels. Will somebody please tell me the pros versus cons of these tempting SLRs. I can't take it anymore! Which one do I buy?! ... Also, what's the difference between a CCD and CMOS sensor, is one better than the other? Somebody please help!
sony-alpha @ Jun 16th 2008 10:19PM
I have had several digital cameras, and this is my first dslr. I love taking pictures with it, especially action shots. Super fast auto focus, choices of programs etc. are found on lots of dslr's. The reason I bought this one is that it accepts Minolta af lenses and the anti-shake technology is in the camera and not in the lens. This makes additional lenses much more affordable.
http://www.sony-alpha.org