In case you haven't been following all the drama over at Engadget Mobile, Taiwanese smartphone kingpin HTC is seeing a rather unexpected customer backlash
over sub-par video playback in recent devices employing Qualcomm's MSM7xxx chipsets -- apparently, handsets like the popular TyTN II and Touch Cruise were purposely shipped without drivers that would take advantage of the embedded ATI Imageon acceleration hardware. And now, instead of issuing a mea culpa or at least providing the drivers for a small fee, HTC has basically suggested in a recent statement
that consumers will need to upgrade to future products if they want "high-resolution video support." Obviously customers are outraged, with the statement only fueling further talk of a class action lawsuit
We think it's time for the Engadget community at large to weigh in on this snowballing controversy: what (if anything) should HTC have done differently in order to maintain the proactive, customer-friendly image that it has up to this point been known for?
What should HTC have done differently with respect to the video driver controversy?
|Nothing, quit whining: they never advertised video acceleration when pitching the devices in question||1681 (10.2%)|
|At least tell me on the box that a known feature of this chipset isn't supported, geez!||1794 (10.9%)|
|Drivers should have been built right in; don't they have some great developers over there, anyway?||5861 (35.5%)|
|Once everyone started complaining, free or very cheap drivers should have been immediately whipped up||5122 (31.0%)|
|Um, why should I care about a minor issue affecting a few phone geeks?||2045 (12.4%)|