Lenovo ThinkCentre A70z review
Setup and configuration

A quick note of commendation must go to Lenovo's packaging here, which comes with an emphasis on minimalism but retains a healthy space between the hardware and the external surface of the box, making it both functional and environmentally friendly.
Hardware and construction

One of the bigger sales points of the A70z is what Lenovo claims to be easily accessible and upgradeable hard drive and memory modules, but with two screws to remove the back cover and five required for the removal of the HDD, we'd say this is on the harder side of easy. That the option is there is indubitably a good thing, but Lenovo's ThinkCentre desktops are known for their toolless access chassis and it's ever so slightly disappointing that the A70z does not match up on that front.The stand isn't quite as easy to operate as Lenovo's claim that you can tilt the machine back and forth with just one hand, but it does provide reliable support at most angles. This is quite important as, by virtue of its design, the A70z already lacks in positional versatility, so what little tilt functionality it offers has to be done well. We're happy to report that that's the case. One note of a more esoteric nature relates to the machine's physical stability. There are many monitors nowadays that come with insufficiently wide stands (Samsung's Pebble series are among the worst offenders), which leads to them being extremely sensitive to any movements of the desktop beneath them. The A70z shines here, as you might expect given that its body rests directly on the desk, and deserves kudos for being so unshakable in the face of the daily rigors a work surface might have to withstand.
Moving to the bundled wireless keyboard and mouse, we've got our reservations about both. While the keyboard is by no means terrible, the shallow travel of the keys and the dull, indeterminate keystroke sound do not lend themselves to a great typing experience. Furthermore, there's significant flex around the K and L keys on the right side, which might be forgiven given the emphasis on the keyboard being "ultra slim." All we'd say on the matter is that Logitech do similar models with no greater girth that provide a far better experience. So there's room for improvement with the keyboard and the same, regrettably, can be said of the mouse. While its top surface is coated in a pleasing matte finish, it's the very size of the peripheral that caused us most bother. It's a strange choice on Lenovo's part to bundle something designed to fit into laptop backpacks with a product in its business-focused ThinkCentre range. Maybe it's just our big hands, but the ergonomics felt wrong and we'd have appreciated a grown up mouse to go along with the grown up computing that we'd want to do on a business machine.
Software and performance

Lenovo's big pledge on the performance front relates to a 35-second boot time -- something we verified for ourselves and can confirm is accurate. In the video below we neglected to note that we installed the auto-starting Skype on the A70z, which probably contributed to the 37-second boot we got. In any case, the lack of labor associated with cables on the outside extends to the user experience as you won't need to modify anything internally as you might have to do with less scrupulous, trialware-peddling vendors.
Equipped with a 2.93GHz Core 2 Duo E7500 and 2GB of RAM, our review unit was perfectly capable of chewing through the things we threw at it. This point probably needs to be stressed a little, as Intel's C2D line of desktop parts is still extremely competent, in spite of the Core 2010 generation taking over in mind and market share alike. We ran a pair of 1080p YouTube videos simultaneously without causing the A70z much strain, and Photoshop work was carried out with little effort again. Given the fact that the targeted business user is mostly looking at Excel spreadsheets and Outlook contacts, this might even be overpowered. We'd still prefer a higher resolution than the 1440 x 900 pixels on offer in the A70z, and probably 4GB of the random-access stuff (the option exists if you care to pay a little more) for when we get a bit carried away with our browser tabs, but there's little else to fault in the spec of this system.
Quite naturally, 3D gaming is completely out of the question, given the integrated Intel GMA X4500 graphics, but that's the one sacrifice you have to expect to make when moving to this form factor. In our view, it's better to completely dismiss the ephemera of gaming than to include an underpowered mobile part as some other machines do, which mostly just misleads optimistic consumers who might expect they'll be able to get their Modern Warfare on while using their space-saving new rig.
Wrap-up
If it hasn't emerged already, the theme of our experience with the A70z was a singular one of competency. It did what we expected it to do, it contained no nasty surprises, but it also didn't bowl us over with anything particularly special. The unit we reviewed is on sale now for around $797 in the US or £611 in the UK, which is a fair bit more than you'd need to spend if you put all the components together yourself. Of course, a premium is to be expected for the comparatively slender profile and the concordant simplification of both setup process and use, but the question we started off with was whether this machine justified receiving the ThinkCentre branding. We can't help but conclude that it just doesn't do enough to merit that mark of excellence. Its construction, attention to detail, and rigorous quality checks are certainly right up there -- that much is readily apparent -- but the omission of a higher resolution display panel, the requirement for tools when accessing memory and hard drive upgrades, and the unsuitable input peripherals place it just a notch below what we might expect from the former IBM brand. All the same, if you ignore who made it and what's it called and just focus on what the A70z is, you'll find one of the better all-in-ones around. Not the best, but better than most.






























2 screws for the cover and 5 for the HDD? Do you know how incredibly hard all in ones are usually to get into? I'd say that's pretty easy comparatively
@insky Exactly, thats not so bad. You know how hard a "simple" hard drive upgrade is on the new iMac's?
@Nitesh
I try to block out that experience, thanks for bringing it back.
@insky It's good that they even put that 2 screws in!
It looks like a computer in the parallell world of Watchmen looking all the way forward to the year 2000.
@To Hell
I think it looks the way a desktop computer should look in a world where computers are a necessity rather than a luxury or a novelty, i.e. this one. It is basically an appliance, why shouldn't it look like one?
@Wolfticket I guess you have a point, i mean i don't want my computer looking like a gumball machine. (or do i?)
But when a manufacturer can't be bothered to encase their products in anti-fug packaging then why shopuld i be bothered to choose it over its competitors?
@To Hell
If I'm buying I always want the option to make it look like a gumball machine/mobile disco option available to me :-).
However, if the boss is paying, or it's solely for exciting stuff like spreadsheets then I think it is better it looks like this. I wouldn't say it is exactly ugly, just business-like, well made and non distracting.
I hate it.
I'm sure the feelings mutual honey.
Good PC for my grandpa. Ewwww!
@One Love: yes, my mammy would like this. I would put it on the wall where she could not bother it, and then auto her f'n AOL and let her cruise away.
I like it. Would, to me, be a great computer to mount in a kitchen for notes from family, watching video while cooking (I have an electronic cookbook on CD and this on a VESA mount would be fantastic)
@CraniusLupus I would buy it as well, I actually like the design. But i WISH it had a touchscreen...
@Firehazel yeah...that is a downsize
@Firehazel downside......
Lead content?
Why do all 'Think' computers look abysmal? I'm sure they function just fine (never used one) but c'mon, just because it'll primarily be used for business, doesn't mean it needs to look like a period piece, Jesus it's ugly.
@superaj This is a matter of taste. For me they look awesome. For me most of consumer desktops and laptops just look silly and flimsy. Professional desktops and laptops like ThinkPad and also Latitudes look solid and serious and that is what I appreciate.
@stoffer Well you're right there. Looks as serious as a heart attack.
Does anyone know what the price of this thing will be like? This thing can't hold a candle compared to an iMac, it's twice as thick and four times as ugly, and most likely it won't be much better for any of the tasks the iMac isn't ideal for (which in fact only includes high-end games as far as I can think of).
It better be dirt cheap
@drange
Ok nevermind about the 'probably not much better than an iMac for high-end gaming', I didn't read this particular bit of the article yet:
"Quite naturally, 3D gaming is completely out of the question, given the integrated Intel GMA X4500 graphics, but that's the one sacrifice you have to expect to make when moving to this form factor"
Well, last time I checked you could get a 24" or 27" iMac that's half the depth of this machine, has a gorgeous IPS screen, and comes with an AMD HD4850. So much for 'a sacrifice you have to make when moving to this form factor' :-/
@drange
Let's be fair. A 27" iMac is $2000. Yes, we all want one, but we can't all afford one.
Plus, this matches my Thinkpad.
@LloydChiro We don't all want one.
@drange $797 > $1,200.
Lenovos always seem to look like they were developed in the 80s :x
It's a TABLET! A big tablet with cord :). It should have had a TrackPoint in the middle of right side (it should also be easy to move it to the left). A TrackPoint is usually waaaaay more accurate than a touchscreen and does not take much space.
Hard to photograph black things, isn't it?
Everyone, I'm putting together a collection to buy Engadget a cheap tripod so they can use a smaller aperture on their lenses. That way, everything will be in focus. Who's in?
I love the minimalism of the design. This really is what thinkpad is to macbook pro: a true PC counterpart to iMac. I may get this.
I`m not always a huge fan of IBM/Lenovo design. However, they aren`t ugly the way all those computers from the 90s until 2005ish were. I think lots of PCs look tacky and gaudy, with glossy black and silver plastic everywhere. My HP laptop is no exception. IBM/Lenovo design is always functional and understated. It lacks the wow factor that Apple`s industrial design has, but it`s good design in a different way. They generally do their hardware they way Linux people often do software. Easy to get inside, durable, minimalist, and a tad idiosyncratic.
@aeiluindae agreed wholeheartedly. I'm a rapid Think-zealot and a Mac fanboy, for that reason. They both have excellent design, Apple just puts a lot more focus on the appearance. They're both minimalist which is what I love.
I go in the Microsoft or Sony store at the local mall and feel like I'm going to vomit, such gaudy computers (including plenty of gaudy Lenovo products at the MS store). The Think products and Apple products have clean lines that I love.
People who think Think products look like ugly 80s computers don't appreciate simple functional designs, they'd rather buy toys.
@kansei My T500 is beautiful (except the lid which stains so so easily). It handles everything I throw at it, seldomly getting hot to the touch. I game on it (with integrated ATI mobility 3650). Which brings me to a point, now I do love mac's as well, but saying that iMacs can handle "high end gaming" is completely false. The iMac's use mobility chip sets which are severely handicapped compared to their desktop counterparts. Also, are there really any high end games on the mac platform at this time?
Back to point, I'm sure this system does everything it was intended to do, does it well and does not get nearly as hot as most competing products.. the one thing the think products has always been known for is .. well outlasting their usefulness. I have an old 390x which just will not die, it plays dvd's (lol, at 800x600 res), but just cannot find much use in the screen anymore.. however it boots to WinXP with no problems and just chugs along just fine.. I would love to see another laptop of this era do it :)
@aeiluindae
The build quality and internal component quality of these computers is what makes them absolutely magnificent in both apple and lenovo/IBM's cases. I know numerous people with macs getting well on in age, but haven't had any personal experiences with them. However, at the office I have 5-10 thinkcentres from 2004/5 that have made it on in life just fine and show no signs of an immediate death. Unfortunately, they need to be replaced but upper management doesn't understand that just because they work doesn't mean they are competent with modern data consumption.
Working in an enterprise environment has really forced me to respect these business machines. I have used only one of the A70z's and it is honestly overpowered for most needs as an enterprise workstation, the build quality is fantastic, and most enterprises will just be buying the standard wired keyboard and mouse (wireless means batteries and those are a pain to replace for IT and administrators) which work just fine. Make no mistake - these machines are meant to get work done - not play around - and for that the screen resolution is adequate and keeps the price down to a relatively low amount per computer terminal.
All in all, these things look great and I may be recommending we replace our older thinkcentres with these sometime this summer.
Poor man's iMac.
@Lundmark Businessman's iMac.
@sys3175
no, like he said... poor man's iMac
@Liquidmark no, like he said... Businessman's iMac
This has a 'library computer' look about it.
Non-Touchy... OHh
At least it's just boring instead of downright ugly like their laptops. That logo really needs to change, though.
Wish that there wasn't as much as glare in the video, otherwise nice review Vlad.