According to a document obtained by Bloomberg the banks are not confident in their ability to fend off or cope with increasingly destructive and sophisticated digital weapons aimed at them.
"We are concerned that the industry may not have the capabilities that we would like to effectively defend against this newer form of potential attack, the capability that we would like to stop such an attack once commenced from spreading to other financial institutions, or the capability we would like of effectively recovering if an initial attack is followed by waves of follow-on attacks."
There is even concern that unaffected banks could be the victims of runs as consumers lose confidence. And to make matters worse, the industry is almost completely reliant on the nation's power grid to function, which is vulnerable not only to cyber attacks, but physical ones as well.
The solution SIFMA has come up with involves creating a council of financial executives and deputy-level representatives from eight government agencies including the Treasury, NSA, Homeland Security and the White House. The hope is that this group would not only prove more powerful in combating hacks of banks, but also more efficient in disseminating information to appropriate parties and the public. The collaboration could ensure a more coherent and effective response to an impending or ongoing cyber attack, but some in congress (like Florida Democrat Alan Grayson) are concerned tactics to turn to pre-emptive strikes. If private industry leaders were sitting on a council that launched even a digital offensive against a group or nation it could set a very bad precedent.