Latest in Gear

Image credit:

The US' TV energy ratings don't reflect the real world

Advocacy group research shows that even new TVs use more power than ratings say they do.
Jon Fingas, @jonfingas
09.25.16 in AV
878 Shares
Share
Tweet
Share
Save

Sponsored Links

If you were hoping that your new, energy-efficient TV might help save the planet (and your power bill), you're in for bad news. Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental advocacy group, has published research showing that the US' energy ratings for TVs (such as EnergyGuide and Energy Star) don't line up with consumption in the real world. Tests on 2015 and 2016 sets from LG, Samsung and Vizio show that they use "up to twice" as much energy as claimed, often by turning off power-saving features with "little to no" warning. Some switch off the eco-friendly mode if you so much as change the picture settings, for example, while high dynamic range video will jack up the energy draw by 30 to 50 percent. Even the test footage used for government tests doesn't reflect the electricity you'd use in real-life viewing, the Council adds.

The NRDC goes so far as to accuse TV makers of "exploiting weaknesses" in US energy tests, designing TVs that feign compliance in test conditions but flout the rules when they're in your living room.

None of the TV makers dispute the basic data, although the Consumer Technology Association unsurprisingly takes issue with the claims of sinister intentions. It insists that the NRDC is pushing "sensational-but-meaningless headlines" and showing an "inexplicable hostility" toward an industry that, in the long run, has saved a tremendous amount of power through TVs that honor EnergyGuide and Energy Star.

The CTA has a vested interest in defending TVs. They're still the Association's bread and butter, as any CES attendee can tell you. However, it's true that TVs have become more efficient over the years, and there's no concrete evidence that TV brands are cheating. Rather, the major concern is simply that TV energy ratings are behind the times. The Department of Energy's testing method is 8 years old, the NRDC notes -- it came about well before the advent of HDR and 4K screens. Officials may need to not only update their guidelines, but take a new approach that constantly adapts to evolving technology.

All products recommended by Engadget are selected by our editorial team, independent of our parent company. Some of our stories include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, we may earn an affiliate commission.
Comment
Comments
Share
878 Shares
Share
Tweet
Share
Save

Popular on Engadget

HyperX just made its Cloud Alpha gaming headset even better

HyperX just made its Cloud Alpha gaming headset even better

View
Spotify's Premium Family plans get an explicit content filter

Spotify's Premium Family plans get an explicit content filter

View
NVIDIA ray-tracing on 'Minecraft' looks surprisingly cool

NVIDIA ray-tracing on 'Minecraft' looks surprisingly cool

View
MIT experts find a way to reduce video stream buffering on busy WiFi

MIT experts find a way to reduce video stream buffering on busy WiFi

View
NASA selects proposals for smallsats built to study deep space

NASA selects proposals for smallsats built to study deep space

View

From around the web

Page 1Page 1ear iconeye iconFill 23text filevr