According to today's report, Tesla invited female staff to an essential oils "lunch and learn" on International Women's Day, but then changed the meeting to one on diversity after employees expressed some criticism. The company tells Engadget that the essential oils event was hosted by an employee Health and Wellness group that invited "Women in Tesla," another employee-run group. Tesla says any e-mail invites didn't come from the company, but rather the group. The company also refutes that the event was changed to a diversity panel, stating that the panel was already in planning before the essential oils e-mails where sent.
The diversity panel included six male employees and one female, according to The Guardian's sources. When it came time for attendee comment, more than 20 women used the opportunity to share stories of sexual harassment, mistreatment and unfair promotion decisions. Vandermeyden was at the meeting, yet was fired shortly thereafter. "They just want to absolutely crush anyone who speaks up," Vandermeyden told The Guardian. "I spoke up, and I was made a sacrificial lamb for it. It's a scary precedent."
Tesla says employees shared both positive and negative accounts at this meeting, but that "allegations of harassment" weren't part of the discussion."When we hear about an issue, investigate and quickly take action when necessary," a Tesla spokesperson tells Engadget.
Technology companies have been under fire lately for a string of high-profile sexual discrimination lawsuits lately, including Uber, Magic Leap, Konami and Tinder. Uber has since investigated the problem, firing more than 20 employees for harassment, while Magic Leap settled its own case. Tesla has since denied Vandermeyden's claims, saying that they "have not been substantiated" and it's making a similar case here in regards to the diversity panel meeting.
Update: When asked for a response to The Guardian's report, a Tesla spokesperson refuted a number of points of the story, saying that it provided similar info to the outlet before the report published. We have updated the post to include some of these responses. Here are those items in full:
- The email mentioned in The Guardian article about "essential oils" wasn't sent by Tesla (the company), but by an employee participant of the employee Health and Wellness group to "Women in Tesla" (another employee group). The Women in Tesla group hosts many events throughout the year and they are optional to all employees. The essential oils event was rescheduled to later in the month due to the large number of Women in Tesla events already planned.
- The Guardian article incorrectly suggests the company cancelled the essential oils event and decided to hold a Town Hall instead. This is false. The Town Hall event was already being planned when the essential oils email was sent.
- Furthermore, the reason groups like Women in Tesla exist is precisely because we want to provide employees with an outlet to share opinions and feedback in a constructive manner. At Tesla, we regularly host events like the Town Hall and only someone who is intentionally trying to misconstrue the facts and paint Tesla in a negative light could perceive such meetings as something negative.
- Employees stood up to ask the executives questions, share their experiences at Tesla — both positive and negative -- while others spoke of things that they believed Tesla was doing right and some came with suggestions. In some instances, employees were only looking for better collaboration with their HR business partners in general and had nothing to do with any allegations of harassment. That said, at Tesla, when we hear about an issue, we investigate and quickly take action when necessary.
- The topics raised in this meeting were followed up directly with those willing to discuss. We have a no tolerance policy and have made changes to leadership, policy and training to continue to improve our work environment.
- It's important to know that after an exhaustive review of the facts, the independent investigator determined that Ms. Vandermeyden's "claims of gender discrimination, harassment, and retaliation have not been substantiated."