Female engineers also apparently have to wait 3.9 percent longer for submitted code to be approved and their work saw 8.2 percent more comments and questions from superiors. An engineer at The Social Network compiled five years of approval logs showing the data, which was then presented to CEO Mark Zuckerberg during an employee-only town hall meeting. Zuckerberg reportedly responded that gender bias was "an issue."
A spokeswoman said the reason for the gendered code rejection is because there "aren't enough" women at senior engineering levels, not just at Facebook, but across tech as a whole -- directing the blame away from her employer. Meaning, if there were more women in those roles, the amount of rejected code would organically be lower. She added that the study was derived from an "incomplete and inaccurate" data set. That's one way to spin this story.
"In an internal post published a month later, Jay Parikh, Facebook's head of infrastructure, attributed any gap in rejection rates to an engineer's rank, not gender," WSJ writes. Parikh's internal post from October used data of its own that appears to be unavailable to general staff members and resulted in different findings. While WSJ's source relied on the length of time an engineer worked at Facebook, Parikh's utilized an engineer's rank. That lead to Parikh writing that when his data set was taken into consideration there wasn't a "statistically significant" difference in code rejection.
As a way to make staffers feel better about the situation, Parikh supposedly tasked employees to take a training course on how to stop biases before they start. Facebook has come under fire for diversity issues before, and this instance reinforces that the problem might still persist. There's the chance that both of the analysis are flawed in their own ways, sure, but given how rampant sexism is in technology there's probably truth to the claims.
We've reached out to Facebook for more information and will update this post should it arrive.