Kodak EasyShare Z980 unboxing and impressions
While Kodak's new Zx1 might be a tad more exciting, Kodak is also keeping at the EasyShare thing with its new Z980 zoomer. We've gotten to spend some time with the camera, and while we appreciate the price, the size and the endless zoom, we're overall none too impressed. Check out our full impressions after the break.
Hardware

Don't let the looks deceive you: this isn't a DSLR. In fact, it feels a bit as if someone overinflated a cheap point and shoot, and stuck a large lens on the front. The camera is disturbingly light and plastic, the buttons seem cheap and don't inspire confidence, and the zoom lens segments actually wiggle around in their housing. We appreciate the cost cutting, but we'd say Kodak cut a few too many corners here.

The camera is actually uncomfortable to hold one handed, since the right grip part is too small and too short for our large hands. There's a large screw-on piece of plastic for the bottom of the camera that makes things a bit more comfortable, and allows for holding the camera in a portrait orientation and using the secondary shutter button, but it seems a little silly to need it.

The screen is large and bright, and we have no complaints there. Battery life should be strong with four rechargeable AA batteries (and the charger) included -- and easily swapped. Unfortunately, the battery cover is a bit of a chore to open and close, and the SD card slot is stuffed underneath there as well.
Performance
Kodak, like most camera manufacturers these days, has put a lot of time into making automagical adjustments to the crappy pictures we take on auto. To that end, the camera does a pretty good job. It pops open the (fairly powerful) flash at appropriate times, recognizes faces to adjust exposure, keeps pics from being too blurry, and attempts to avoid excess noise whenever possible.
That said, the pictures just aren't great -- there's only so much a small and cheap sensor can do. The pictures aren't overly noisy, but just seem cheap. Colors are flat, and the end results look a little over processed. Most consumers probably won't mind too much, but don't get any delusions that you'll be able to turn out gold with the right lighting and setup -- there are just some fundamental limitations here.
The camera starts up fairly quickly, and it's easy to switch modes, turn off the flash and so forth. The manual controls are easily accessed, but a bit of a chore to use -- there's a plasticy jog dial that's been assigned too much to do. The settings are also unlabeled, so you don't know what "f3.5" or "1/25" mean you aren't going to get much help.

We found the video mode adequate, though the "720p" video is quite obviously upscaled -- much more noticeably than the Zx1, though the camera seems to capture motion more smoothly than its YouTube-loving sibling. The sound is also very bad.
Wrap-up
Overall, we'd say this camera is good at zooming and that's about it. If you want something that just takes "good" pictures and don't need anything fancy, you'd probably be better off with a compact point and shoot from Canon or Nikon -- plus you can stick those in your pocket. If you want to do the near-DSLR thing, we'd say save up your pennies and get something that can actually produce a good image. If you want to zoom to your heart's content, however, the Z980 might just be your thing.
Samples (right click to download)
Overcast day in NY - 720p 30fps
NY sidewalk 1 - 12 megapixels 1x zoom
NY sidewalk 2 - 12 megapixels 24x zoom
Hardware



Performance
Kodak, like most camera manufacturers these days, has put a lot of time into making automagical adjustments to the crappy pictures we take on auto. To that end, the camera does a pretty good job. It pops open the (fairly powerful) flash at appropriate times, recognizes faces to adjust exposure, keeps pics from being too blurry, and attempts to avoid excess noise whenever possible.
That said, the pictures just aren't great -- there's only so much a small and cheap sensor can do. The pictures aren't overly noisy, but just seem cheap. Colors are flat, and the end results look a little over processed. Most consumers probably won't mind too much, but don't get any delusions that you'll be able to turn out gold with the right lighting and setup -- there are just some fundamental limitations here.
The camera starts up fairly quickly, and it's easy to switch modes, turn off the flash and so forth. The manual controls are easily accessed, but a bit of a chore to use -- there's a plasticy jog dial that's been assigned too much to do. The settings are also unlabeled, so you don't know what "f3.5" or "1/25" mean you aren't going to get much help.

These have only been cropped vertically, they're both the real deal.
The 24x zoom is indeed very zoomy, and operates quite nicely. It's going to open up a whole new world of spying on our neighbors, that's for sure.We found the video mode adequate, though the "720p" video is quite obviously upscaled -- much more noticeably than the Zx1, though the camera seems to capture motion more smoothly than its YouTube-loving sibling. The sound is also very bad.
Wrap-up
Overall, we'd say this camera is good at zooming and that's about it. If you want something that just takes "good" pictures and don't need anything fancy, you'd probably be better off with a compact point and shoot from Canon or Nikon -- plus you can stick those in your pocket. If you want to do the near-DSLR thing, we'd say save up your pennies and get something that can actually produce a good image. If you want to zoom to your heart's content, however, the Z980 might just be your thing.
Samples (right click to download)
Overcast day in NY - 720p 30fps
NY sidewalk 1 - 12 megapixels 1x zoom
NY sidewalk 2 - 12 megapixels 24x zoom






















cute!
Very. Canon and Nikon better watch it.
lolwut
Great Zoom!!
Zoom...goooood..... but I'd rather have better pics and passable video. Back to shopping the Panasonic FZ28 :)
Amen to that. I did a LOT of research before I bought. Everything kept coming back to the FZ-18/FZ-28. Sure enough when I told the salesman at Henry's what I wanted in a camera, without giving away that I'd done any research, he only pulled out one model to show me: FZ-28. I ended up buying one of their used FZ-18s (only real difference is 8mp instead of 10mp on the FZ-28) for a nice low price and the image quality has been spectacular. I'm still amazed at the quality of the glass in that camera, as well as the lack of distortion at the extents of the zoom range.
My Fuji S5200 has a 10x zoom, and I'm pretty good at keeping steady enough to take in-focus photos at that range (ex. http://www.flickr.com/photos/one9us/3387928744/ ). I'd be interested in seeing how difficult it is to free-hand a 24x shot.
Unlike the s5200, this camera has optical image stabilization. That can be a big help at those longer telephoto ranges.
awesome quality for $400 price range
Pics are just too noisy.
Erm, cute to say "These have only been cropped vertically, they're both the real deal."
But I don't think kodak embeds engadget logo's and joins crops in the RAW format, so this is re-compressed and manipulated thanks.
Notice how the ones that have the Engadget mark are actually photos of the camera itself (i.e., taken with ANOTHER camera).
I think he meant "real deal" as in, that's actually a picture using the full 24x zoom length, not just a cropped-out part of the first picture.
Look again, although faint the zoom one has the logo, and is a single picture of 2 shots, and has a rectangle to indicate the zoom position and a '1x' and '24x' marking, and that's what I am indeed talking about.
And like so many review sites unfortunately do too, a re-compressed picture just isn't a sample of the original, and the term 'real deal' and 'only vertically cropped' is simply not correct. (you can in fact make lossless jpeg crops incidentally.)
Oh no! They added a logo! That totally makes the picture fake, doesn't it?
See my last reply to you from another article. STOP POSTING ON THE INTERNET AFTER YOU'VE SMOKED THAT MUCH CRACK!
Hey mike, great effort showing ignorance, you must be proud, why don't join the freaking army too to complete the picture.
Image links are the wrong way round :)
I was kind of looking forward to this. I have Kodak V1253 right now, had a P850 before this (I needed the HD video, hence the switch) and was looking forward to the 24x zoom. Unfortunately the video really does look too upscaled, and the pictures are noisy as hell. Gonna have to pass on this one.
Is this for real? The specs seem pretty good, but the picture samples are terrible. Are those shot at iso 800? Is that from the auto mode? I can't believe it's putting out such terrible shots at that price.
I was expecting more from this camera. I got a Panasonic FZ-28 a few months back and really like it but all the news of these new super zooms had me interested in the new models. Sad to see how badly this one is performing. I do hope to see a more in-depth article, and hopefully without such a negative spin on it.
ISO 64 on this camera looks like ISO 800 from my 3-year-old 6MP Canon Powershot A540.
Was Kodak even trying?
interesting... but i think the camera looks too boxy myself..
Actually the pics from this camera look pretty good. Any camera is gonna
look bad with horrible lighting conditions like that. Pop over to the Kodak forum
on dpreview.com for some other examples.
For the price (picked mine up for just over $300) it's a great camera
Look at this Flickr Z980 specific gallery:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/honemastert/sets/72157616613805220/
Here is a 24X zoom example in better light:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3392/3436524637_6516e1220a_o.jpg
I've been a diehard Canon p&s fan for years, but these Kodaks with HD video capability
have found a place in my quiver of photography tools.
It's really nice to be able to grab some HD video clips of the kids and
then take photos.
Canon is *just now* getting HD
video support on their cameras!
http://www.timschneider.org