Dyson DC23 Turbinehead impressions

If you've never used a Dyson, get ready to be weirded out upon unboxing this beast. Without a doubt, the design here is unorthodox through and through, and it looks absolutely nothing like the $49 Hoover you're currently wasting your time with. By and large, the vac is sufficiently compact, though the tall handle does make it seem a touch ungainly when everything's assembled. Granted, you can always disconnect it in order to store the whole contraption underneath a bed, and anyone who has back troubles will definitely appreciate the lengthy handle's ability to give you full control without forcing you to bend over and push.

To be frank, we're not vacuum experts, but we're probably coming at this from the same angle as the general consumer. We set out to discover one thing: is this Dyson, even at "only" $399.99, worth the coin? We've grown frustrated with sub-$100 vacuums for years now. After a handful of trips around the carpet, suction slowly fades until you're forced to run over a particle of dirt eight times in order to get it off of the floor. You know the feeling, we're sure. After using the DC23 as our main vac for a few weeks now, we can safely say that the suction today is as good as the suction on day one. Will it really suck as much in five years as it does today? We'd surmise that it wouldn't, but you can rest assured that it'll perform at a high level for far longer than most generic competitors.
As far as usage is concerned, we generally loved it. The telescoping handle enabled us to run about without any back pains, and the auto-recoiling AC cable kept us from having to wind things up on our own once the job was done. The canister itself is delightfully light (the entire unit weighs 19.5 pounds), though we can't say we were in love with how it drug along behind the handle. If you don't mind tugging, you can definitely keep it close, but we were expecting a somewhat more elegant solution for having the canister trail the brush bar. We should also point out that the the aforesaid bar is shorter than we expected, which was both a blessing and a curse. On one hand, the length was essentially the same as each of our steps, enabling us to use the bar itself to easily vacuum the stairway. On the other, this kept us whisking about for longer periods in the den, as it didn't cover as much ground as our cheaper, less sucky options.

Dyson also throws in a stair tool, brush tool and crevice tool, all of which proved to be handy in their respective situations. We should also note that the DC23 had no issue sucking up pet hair on hard and carpeted surfaces, which is historically difficult for "regular" vacuums. In fact, the pet hair pickup was probably the most impressive aspect in our minds. If you've got a Fido or two hanging around your crib, and you're already thinking of putting 'em on Craigslist just to rid yourself of the hair problem, the DC23 just might be the lifesaver those canines have been longing for.
All told, there's no question that the DC23 Turbinehead is worth every penny if $400 ain't no thang. Of course, it won't magically remove stains (that'll take some carpet cleaner, kids), but it will do wonders on picking up dirt, debris, dust and all sorts of other garbage you never knew resided in your carpet. It's easy to maneuver, it picks up practically every strand of pet hair it runs over and it's remarkably easy to unload when the time comes. If you're looking to buy a vacuum that'll do the job for a few years to come, it's probably worth forking out for this. If you'd rather buy a new $79 special every dozen months, we certainly can't stop you. In the long run, the DC23 is probably a sound investment, and hey, you could always go in halvsies with the neighbor to save a little cheddar.



_103x88.jpg)
_103x88.jpg)
_103x88.jpg)
_103x88.jpg)
_103x88.jpg)




















I heard this thing sucks...
.
Oh, what?
"FIRST!" would have been more clever.
@ boot2taco: Hmmm... No.
Their slogan should be "only an idiot DOESN'T buy a Dyson"!
Any self respecting nerd would never settle for less.
A vacuum at that price better suck. If it blows, return it.
It needs to suck, and blow. If it only sucks the internal pressure would rise until it burst, or created a blackhole, and then and only then it would only suck.
Yes, I know about Hawkings radiation, but you can hardly say it's blowing.
Overengineered comment for a overengineered vacuum.
"oh no, she's gone from suck to blow!"
yes it does. and when it was missing on my moving manisfesto, it really really sucked!
Kirby FTW, had mine since the Earth cooled and it's still going strong.
@junk "Any self respecting nerd would never settle for less."
I see your Dyson and raise you Roomba.
Performance wise, the Dyson has continuously been rate at mid to upper mid of the pack on Consumer Report for years. There are better vacs out there for last, Dyson buyers are just paying for a bit more style but the whole cost of all their advertising.
The way consumer reports does their assessments doesn't play to the vacuum's strengths, though. What Dysons do well is continue to suck up dust even when the canister is almost completely full - no other vacuum does that (the system's patented). You can get the effect if you empty your vacuum when it's half full, and Consumer Reports do test the vacuum over time, but they empty them. Honestly, what I'm paying for in a Dyson is the fact that I can do my house without having to empty the canister before I'm done, and the floor in the last room is as clean as the floor in the first.
@Engadget - FWIW, mine is 4 years old and, as long as I clean the filters every 6 months as they suggest, it seems to still be performing as well as it did when I bought it. That, in and of itself, is impressive.
a vacuum cleaner on engadet? whats so special about this compared to the others? can i connect on wifi and check my emails on this
There's a rumor MS is going to buy a license and put a phone in one.
Because engadget only covers gadget that allows you to receives/send emails and has wifi?
Dyson "paid" for product placement.
I have long used the Roomba robotic vacuum to keep my living spaces sufficiently (if barely) suitable for human habitation, but I'm thinking about buying a dyson coz I noticed that to clean the roomba after each vacuuming takes even longer than personally vacuuming the floors.
If they are gonna sell this this Dyson in scandinavia i guess I'll gonna buy one.
Cheaper than another roomba anyway.
Why did you put paid in quotations? Is that supposed to be irony?
As a dog owner, I've long appreciated my Dyson's ability to pick up the fur. I'm sure this unit will be no different. I ended up with a refurbished model from Woot for $250 though, so $400 still sounds pricey to me. Still, it beats buying a new vacuum every year.
WOOT! is also where I got my Dyson. It's been going strong for 2 years and was less than $250 :) Respiffied is certainly the way to go with these babies
Wait...respiffed babies? What? You lost me.
Bingo! I got the DC15 from Amazon refurbished for $220... after nearly a year of using it, I would easily pay full price for one, but when you don't have to, why do it!?
@ JaceFace
Respiffed.... I'm going to have to remember that!! I'm on my second Dyson, sold the first one to a friend so I could pick up the first gen ball. I even trained my dogs to let me vacuum them! Once they figured out you can't lick the end of the tube they love it.
As a dog owner, I use a shop vac. I think I paid maybe $30 for it. Only change I made was to add a filter to the exhaust port. I don't have carpeting other than a few runners though.
I like that engadget suddenly remembers there are more gadgets than phones and laptops, it's a welcome diversion.
.
I for one welcome soccer moms to Engadget.
$399 may seem ridiculous to spend on a vacuum cleaner (I mean, how much better can a Dyson be over a Hoover?), but if you have restaurateur issues like my family does, you want the best vacuum cleaner on the market... and that usually means a Dyson.
How much better can a Dyson be? MUCH better.
I had my fair share of cheapies, bought a Dyson, roomate decided to use it to vacuum up cement, went back to cheapies and now have another Dyson.
They suck better, the plastics are stronger. Two things however separate the Dyson from the crap. The cord winding mechanism doesnt break. On the cheapies the cord winds in 90% of the way, forcing you to push the rest in (or it will wind in so fast it takes off your legs).
Second thing is the noise, the cheapies seem to keep getting louder and louder until you run screaming out of the room with bleeding ears.
*thinks of Scary Movie and Doofy* i bet he sees the investment in buying a Dyson.
At this point, I feel like I should put a word in for Mieles. It's no surprise that a $400 Dyson is better than a $50 cheapie, but I'd prefer to see it compared with a top-o-the-range Miele. I've got a bottom-o-the-range model (the cheapest I could get my hands on, probably about $220) and I'm seriously impressed. It looks pretty much like a normal vacuum, but it's solid as a shick brithouse and has sucked hard all the way into its third year in my possession.
Any of you domestic geekhunks got experience of both Miele AND Dyson? Some comparative criticism would be welcomed.
We used to have an upright Dyson but it eventually got old. Now we have this Electrolux (which is meant to be a fairly good brand) and it's just really bad! The cable is much shorter, it's a lot heavier and it doesn't suck as well. Unfortunately because it was quite a bit cheaper my mom was just like "meh, let's keep it, I can manage" but she really hates it now. My dad might get her a Dyson for Christmas. She would actually love that!
For commercial use, nothing beats a Numatic. (I'm not sure if they are available in the states). They last forever.
"Any of you domestic geekhunks got experience of both Miele AND Dyson?"
Yeah - I found the Dyson to be flimsy and weak compared to my Miele Capricorn, and I played with two of the high end Dyson models that friends of mine own, so I got to really spend some time with them in an actual home. The Capricorn kicks the ever loving crap out of them. Of course, it was 3 times the price of a high end Dyson, but it's worth every penny if you ask me. I don't regret my decision to go with the Miele for a second.
My carpet needs a Dyson. My wallet still won't let me have one.
The Dyson Blade hand dryers rock. I was skeptical until I encountered one in a local bar and holy hell...they really do just push the water right off your hand.
I've got a Dyson vacuum cleaner (bit like this one, few years older model) and it's great...
...but come on, those hand dryers totally don't work. They don't work a bit quicker, a bit noisier, and with a LOT more style than the way normal electric hand dryers don't work, but they still don't work. Sadly, electric hand-dryers have yet to approach the level of advanced towel technology...
They've got them in the bogs at Waterloo station here in the UK - Totally amazing bit of hand drying action.
However, one of the competing manufacturers now has what appears to be a standard hand dryer, but really REALLY blows - it makes your skin ripple worse than Jeremy Clarkson's face in a Ariel Atom.
you've probably never used any power hand dryer's before (most walmarts in my area have them, and seriously its faster than a towel) And you dont know how to use a normal dryer either. you're supposed to rub your hand gently and rapidly under the dryer.
That thing looks like it's going to transformed.
I have a Dyson and I don't regret spending $400 for it. That's all I have to say.
+1
I've had my Dyson for about 6 years and it's just as good as the day I bought it.
I am interested in this model because it's more suited to my current house than my large upright is, but the fact is that my current Dyson is unlikely to break ... ever, at the rate it's going.
My friend's is even older and likewise his is as good as it ever was.
Dysons are completely worth the money and are very reliable, plus the modularity means that any part can be replaced without having to buy a whole new vacuum (not that I've had the need to replace anything).
Consumer Reports is pointless in its vacuum reviews, I've concluded. Have you not noticed that every "mainstream" brand now copies DYSON'S design? Why do you suppose?
I will absolutely get a Dyson again and recommend one to anyone who asks my opinion. I have two Golden Retrievers. My Roomba was destroyed by their dog hair. The Dyson is unaffected. Nothing rivals Golden Retriever shedding as a challenge to any vacuum. The Dyson meets this challenge handily.
Husky fur. That rivals anything. Give them a week and every surface and corner is covered in that stuff.
Love it. More everyday technology please.
Yes! I'd want to see a review of novelty items as well - e.g. Wake-up Light Alarms and the Chillow Pillow.
Do you mean to say I'm supposed to vacuum my apartment EVERY DAY? Damn, that's 30 times higher frequency than what I do now :S.
chillow is pretty good. gets bunched up if you have a really fluffy pillow (like down) and then it's sort of a pain to get the foam-core inside the plastic baggie 'flat' again...(to do so, overfill it with water, and then it's easier to flatten out the foam), and is not 'cool' by the morning anymore, but all in all, I'd consider it a good purchase.
if you have a fluffier pillow you want to use it with, I found adhesive velcro strips to work pretty well in keeping it in place.
Roomba FTW! :-D
I am amazed that dyson somehow spun itself as the nerd's vacuum company
It´s the way it looks.
I know, dude! 'effin Dyson vacuums are _such_ a Stuff White People Like entry.
-jp