Entelligence: Lessons from the iPad launch
Entelligence is a column by technology strategist and author Michael Gartenberg, a man whose desire for a delicious cup of coffee and a quality New York bagel is dwarfed only by his passion for tech. In these articles, he'll explore where our industry is and where it's going -- on both micro and macro levels -- with the unique wit and insight only he can provide.

1. Define what your product does. The first thing Apple did was answer that question immediately and then define what the product needed to do. Apple explained what capabilities need to be in the this class of device and then went on to show how each of those features not only worked but were optimized for the iPad. That's something we've seen lacking in this category to date.
2. Leverage what you've done before. I believe the iPad is likely to do well with consumers as it leverages Apple's previous successes with the iPod and the iPhone. At the base level, that's compatibility and synchronization with iTunes as well as backward compatibility with existing applications. That's important -- as a user I can use my existing content library and my application collection. It also means that iPad has 140,000-plus applications at launch. But it's more than that. Apple is not only leveraging its ecosystem of devices and software, it's leveraging the lessons it spent a decade teaching consumers. Apple taught its market about MP3 players, digital music, smartphones, capacitive multitouch screens and mobile apps. It can now go directly to selling the form factor, as well as new features such as productivity and e-books.
3. Make your product additive to your ecosystem. What separates the iPad from being just a large iPod Touch or small MacBook -- although it has clear aspects of both -- is that Apple made the product additive to the line and optimized the software for the experience. While backward compatibility is great for early adopters who can use their iPhone apps, long term it's about developers who will create optimized experiences for the device. Apple demonstrated how games, newspapers, books and productivity functions are all different than either the corresponding phone or computer experience, yet familiar at the same time. The result is that other Apple products will help sell iPad in the short term, but the iPad will likely help sell other Apple products over the long term. Users will provide context for specific use cases and decide what device is appropriate for what scenario.
Other Apple products will help sell iPad in the short term, but the iPad will likely help sell other Apple products over the long term |
4. Solve a problem, don't be a feature. I personally like Tablet PCs and what Microsoft has done with Windows in the space, but Tablet is a feature on top of Windows, not an experience designed for a new form factor. Devices like the JooJoo or even the Kindle are designed to do primarily one thing and are essentially one feature products. Apple seems to have learned to provide an out-of-the-box experience which solves specific consumer use cases for media consumption, internet use and productivity, while also providing the framework to allow others to build on top of that and provide further solutions designed for this form factor.
Apple didn't invent the MP3 player market or the smartphone market, and it's got a long way to go in the market for tablet devices. In each case, it refined the concept to make a device that appealed to the enthusiast market but was able to go beyond that space and capture the attention (and wallets) of the mass market. Vendors competing with Apple in this space are going to need to understand these lessons and in many cases change not only their current products, but the story they tell.
Michael Gartenberg is vice president of strategy and analysis at Interpret, LLC. His weblog can be found at gartenblog.net. Contact him at gartenberg AT gmail DOT com. Views expressed here are his own.





















@SteveJobsCEO
Meanwhile they can visit the Dell store.
@SteveJobsCEO
While that is down...
I welcome everyone to Asustek. Come...get a REAL computer.
@Jerry Shen
If your gonna try to be a fake CEO of a major computer retail company, then you might want to add a avatar to your profile.
@Michael Dell
I've been trying forever to add/change my pic. It just won't let me. Engadget has some bias against me.
@Jerry Shen they do buy Asus, all macs are built by Asus.... other then that, yeah get an real Asus laptop...
@Jerry Shen
I guess you're using Chrome. I've been trying to do the same for months but since I'm not willing to download any other browser (or run IE) I think I'll keep it like this.
@Michael Dell Oh BUUUUUURN on @SteveJobsCEO!
@Michael Dell DELL is a dead company. It now rebrands all taiwanese product. It should just disappear.
This article is nice. But I just have a few naggles.
How is this a "small MacBook?"
The iPad can't do even half of the things a MacBook Air does...
@iDavey
I meant how is it LIKE a small macbook. Sorry.
iPhone OS sucks!
@00iEye00
www.engadget.com/exclude/apple
@iDavey How much ass could and iPad suck if an iPad could suck ass?
@formetopoopon
http://www.engadget.com/exclude/apple
You have no excuse for commenting in this thread.
@Jack Oh, I c..... This thread is an apple fanboi circle jerk..... Awkward..... I'll leave it to ya then.
@iDavey Contradictory:
3. Be additive, iPad is large iPod but more.
4. Tablet is feature on top of Windows
This is contradictory because Tablet functionality was additive to the Windows ecosystem.
@HighestRanked
"Windows eco system = Useless"
Dude you should tell this to all the fortune 500 companies using windows and 7 out of 10 of them who are using windows mobile.
My roflcopt3r. it g0es SOISOISOISOISOISOISOISOI
@Outsider
That comment is as relevant as the iPad.
@Outsider On the contrary, I think it's more relevant ;)
AHAHAHAHAHAHA
This articles makes me laugh. It's absurd and most of all, makes it look like apple created the design of tablets.
HAHAHAHAHA
@swanle
What I'm wondering is if steve jobs is actually testing the stupidity of apple fanboys.
Imagine he comes out with the iVagina and calls it the best vagina to revolutionize the industry. Wonder how many will sell.
@swanle I won't deny that Steve Jobs may have created the divine spark that started computer life, but clearly Macs are evolutionary in design.
@chrisrottan
Millions! It will be the closest most of these losers will ever come to knowing the warm velvety embrace of a ladies lady parts. And it will be fully compatible with your iPad for that time of the month.
@chrisrottan If he did, the human population crisis would be solved. That, and a lot more dildos will be sold.
@chrisrottan
It really is utter crap I'm amazed Engadget allowed it to be posted. Who the f**k is Michael Gartenberg anyway?
@chrisrottan and all of you in this thread:
http://www.engadget.com/exclude/apple
You have no excuse.
@swanle More like 4, really. Xcode is that good.
@chrisrottan ROFL
@Jack
So I just did a check on the "Apple-Free Engadget"
There are no fewer than 7 references to Apple on the front page alone. Seriously, count for yourself if you don't believe me.
Granted it is about 95% less than normal, but I think what people are more concerned with is there seems to be the need to compare every product ever made to its apple counterpart.
@patlennas88
use http://www.engadget.com/exclude/apple|ipad|iphone|itunes|stevejobs|ipod|mac|osx
Why did only the first 12 characters of my response show up? New comment system please!
@swanle
www.engadget.com/exclude/apple
Bookmark it. Get to know it. Love it.
What a bunch of BS. This is the worst Gartenberg article ever.
@Steve Jobs Jr You could say that about everyone of his articles.
@Edobe
Engadget is slowly but o so surely turning into a fail blog; this saddens me.
@Steve Jobs Jr
This is exactly what I say every time Gartenberg writes an article. Seriously Engadget, get someone, anyone, else to write editorials.
so...many...iPad...articles
@kojo87
http://www.engadget.com/exclude/ipad
or
http://www.engadget.com/exclude/apple
@iDavey
if there was only a way to read articles and avoid fanboys from both sides at the sametime.
@iDavey you've posted that like 300 times and i've seen it before. i am not an idiot. if i wanted to use that i would. i did not say i don't want to see the articles. i find the comments on them funny.
@chrisrottan
Next thing you know, Engadget will deply the www.engadget.com/exclude/fanboy page...
Keeping you free from all forms of fanboy.
Only downside?
You'll only 1 article every 3 weeks, lmao.
@kojo87
Well you seemed a little stressed out about the iPad articles.
I mean, you'd think one would be used to it by now.
I know I am.
@chrisrottan
http://www.engadget.com/exclude/fanboys
or
http://www.engadget.com/exclude/ipadhaters
...just wishful thinking,
Why do people feel the need to go on and on about how terrible this device is? If Apple didn't want to include flash, a web cam or multitasking, so what, it's their product, they can do what they like.
If it was the Dellpad or Sonypad nobody would care...
There are so many articles, because Apple have raised the bar so high with the iphone, people have almost mythical expectations of their products.
@kojo87
I've seen it 300 times before, too, but that was the first time I actually clicked on it. It leads to a much better gadget site. (heh)
I'll probably change my bookmark to it.
@zakany
I'm glad I could help someone ^_^
@chrisrottan Frankly, I think that Engadget should put this into place:
IF DOWNRANKED=50 THEN LOSER=BANNED
This would be both interesting and poignant if it hasn't all been said before in thirty other articles.
This may seem jaded or rhetorical or ill-informed, but what software did they optimize for the iPad? From what I've read the OS is just a port.
@SomEngangVar, by optimized they made everything bigger so that it could stretch better. Other than that and making some new apis for devs not much.