When the Kobo e-reader first appeared, its very affordable price point of $149 made it an attractive proposition. It's been a few months, however, and the market is ever-more crowded, with both dedicated e-readers as well as multi-taskers (such as the iPad) moving into the space big time, and there are also plenty of similarly priced options, including the
WiFi version of the Nook. In fact, almost anything qualifies as an e-reader these days -- but there's still room for a thin, light dedicated device that reads books in an enjoyable way for an affordable price... or at least that's the story that Kobo is trying to tell.
We've spent the last few weeks reading with the Kobo, with the main goal being to find out if the simple device has enough features to contend with the host of options (and price points) available to consumers today. Read on for our thoughts.
Look and feel
Despite being a "cheap" e-reader (more on what that means in practice below), Kobo's device is, in practice, pretty awesome feeling. No, it doesn't feel as substantial as the much heavier Nook, but that is actually a good thing, it turns out, because the device is so comfortable to hold in the hand -- an experience we've always found lacking with the Nook, and, to a lesser extent, the Kindle. The rubbery "quilted" back is tacky enough that you can hold the 6-incher comfortably with just one hand, a move we've never perfected with the
Nook,
Kindle 2, or
iPad. The large blue d-pad for paging is a little bit mushy for our tastes, but it certainly gets the job done, with very few accidental key presses -- always nice to see. The only other buttons on the Kobo -- Home, Menu, Display, and Back, are seated nicely on the left-hand side of the device. It's very bare bones, but there's really nothing to complain about.
The display is something of another story. While its an e Ink-er, meaning that reading on it is, generally, pretty fantastic, the Kobo's lack of built-in screensaver has caused our unit to already have a fairly noticeable "burned in" home screen -- something we find to be pretty annoying. But more on the display in a moment. Ultimately, the Kobo's hardware is actually more enjoyable to use than many other e-readers we've run into: its simplicity and lack of features is actually its strong point, because holding the device is the closest thing to the experience of holding an actual book or magazine that we've encountered. The relative lack of elements for your hand to encounter while holding the unit -- for instance, there's no headphone jack... because there's no media player -- make it smooth and easy to grip whether you're curled up on the couch or laying on your back across your bed, and you don't have to fear dropping it on your face (as we often have with the iPad) because, even if you do, it's unlikely to do
that much damage.
E-reader experience
The Kobo e-reader has 1GB of storage (plus an SD card for more), which means you can house about 1,000 books in it, and it comes pre-loaded with 100 classics. While that sounds great on the surface, and surely will be for some buyers, we're actually not huge fans of Gutenberg e-books in practice, but this could just be us: we'd prefer to pay $5 - $10 for a copy of
Sense and Sensibility with great formatting. But for most, the wide selection of pre-loaded classics is a nice touch -- especially since there's no internet connectivity here, and the only way to get selections onto your device is by USB connection to your computer. That's a huge drawback, to be sure -- but back to the reading experience.
The e Ink screen is very simple, but very enjoyable to read on -- regardless of your lighting situation. e Ink continues to be the standard in e-reading, and it's the option we prefer. Page refresh rate on the Kobo is slower than we'd like. It's slower than the Kindle and the iPad, and slower than the Nook has been in our experience since the 1.4 firmware upgrade (unfortunately, our Nook unit is having some major performance issues right now, i.e., it appears to be dead, so we couldn't test them against each other). This is one place where we continue to have issues with e-readers: in the time it takes to turn a page, maybe your mind thinks a bit on what it's just read, and regardless, that behavior is so ingrained you barely notice it. With an e-reader, you make a decision to hit that button, and then -- lag -- wait for the page to "turn." It is an experience-breaking lag we really wish wasn't there. Other than that, the Kobo runs quite smoothly -- after all, there's really nothing going on, so you'd expect the device to be without hiccups, and it is.
Battery life and performance
Kobo proclaims that its reader gets about 2 weeks on a single charge. We haven't had our unit quite two weeks, but we've only charged it once and it's still hanging on with well over half of its life remaining. Whereas battery life on devices such as the iPad or Nook can be annoying, the Kobo's simplistic list of functions -- it really only reads -- again stands it in good stead here. Overall performance-wise, books can take longer than we'd like to see to load up, though when it wakes from sleep, it reloads the page fast enough to satisfy us. The process of software updating was also not without its annoyances -- a complicated series of simultaneous button presses (three of them! with two hands!) meant that we had to try several times before we got the reboot to take effect, but once we had that accomplished, the update proceeded without headache.
What's missing and wrap-up
E-readers these days are defined by their features, meaning, essentially: 'what do they do besides books?' By that metric, the Kobo doesn't fare well: it's got no internet connectivity, no media player, a relatively small storage space (both the Kindle 2 and the Nook boast 2GB), and no browser (because there's no internet!). That said, a lot of readers which do boast features like browsers aren't doing so very successfully, and for this bargain barrel price, we're just as happy to not have one. After all, the point is to read, right? At the end of the day, if you're an avid reader looking to shell out a relatively small amount of money, you might not care about listening to Nine Inch Nails while you browse the pages of
20,000 Leagues Under the Sea (seriously, who does that?!). The Kobo store, in conjunction with the Borders e-book store, offers a pretty massive collection of over 1 million titles, so nearly any reader will be satisfied, with plenty of new bestsellers coming in at around $10 -- a price which we have no problem with. Bluetooth syncing with mobile devices (Kobo's launched e-reader apps for most platforms) is a nice touch for the reader who must read wherever they are.
Here's the thing: the fact that the Kobo e-reader isn't a multitasker like the iPad and newer "hybridized" devices might not signal its failure in any way. In fact, its single-use is justified by its price. Is it the best e-reader we've ever used? No -- like we said, its page-refreshes are a little slow, and for a device that's all about the business of reading, that's no small thing. And, as we mentioned at the beginning, the e-reader market is increasingly filled with similarly-priced options, many of which boast more features. Still, we can say pretty firmly that its thinness, lightness, and comfort in the hand is far and away its strongest feature, and one that it beats a lot of its more robust competition prettily handily. So, if the Kobo reader isn't quite the future of reading devices, it's certainly firmly entrenched in the present, with enough likeable qualities at a price point that few could argue with, to keep it on our list of readers we wouldn't mind spending a night at home curled up with on the sofa, reading
Wuthering Heights while our significant other plays Red Dead Redemption.
The Kobo looks good, but they want $50 more for it than I am willing to pay.
@Dinochicken Exactly. I get that it has a budget angle going, but e-readers are investments and something you'll be using everyday. Just wait and save up the money to get a great model instead of rushing in.
I'd rather be in business with Amazon than Kobo as well.
@Dinochicken I bought this on impulse a few weeks ago and immediately returned it. For $40 more I can get the Amazon Kindle. If this hits $99, I'll definitely considering it. It's great to just have lying around and it definitely feels great, but the lack of wifi and the slow page-turning don't make it worth the $150 pricetag.
@MisterDBarton
Refurbed Kindle 2s (but of reported excellent refurb quality) were on sale for $110 only several days ago (and brand new Kindle 2s were on sale for a day at Woot for $155).
The Kobo needs a significant drop in price to compete.
In Australia, Borders sell them for AUD199.
attractive design but if it wants to compete with the kindle, some additions need to be made pronto.
The price seems a bit high now that the WiFi Nook also resides at $150.
@Vidikron
That's what I was thinking.
Oh well. Lovin' my Nook 3G
Isn't the Nook going for USD 150 now as well?
I agree with the other sentiments. I really want a cheap no frills ereader, but if I am getting that then this is still too expensive.
Having said that I don't want the complexity of the iPad or the problems of the Kindle (which isn't available in Singapore anyway) or the Nook.
@abhiroopb
Apparently you couldn't use it anyway, but what are these problems with the Kindle of which you speak?
@chispito Honestly it's all hearsay (i.e. reviewers, etc.) and I can't pin down the exact criticisms (it's 1.30 am in Singapore), but for memory I read that the software/firmware wasn't really up to scratch. This may be completely of from normal usage, but considering it's more expensive and seems "heavier" I'd rather go for a smaller, lighter option (i.e. Kobo)
@abhiroopb
I have a Kindle and the software/firmware doesn't really get in the way when it comes to buying or reading books. The web browsing is so-so, but it's not designed to be a selling feature.
A 4-way pad for page turns seems a little strange compared to the usual buttons on the side the Nook and Kindle use- does that impair the usability at all?
@EpsilonNot
It's actually very good. I have a Cybook, which is pretty much the same design.
The button sits at just the right position to allow page turns with a little extra pressure from the hand you are holding it in. And seriously, the page turning is the most crucial control. Get that wrong by making it too awkward or needing a second hand,and you have screwed up the whole thing.
@(Unverified) But what if you hold it with your left hand, like I do? The Kindle's got Next buttons on both sides, so it's ambidextrous.
@myopiczeal Just don't hold it that way. Not a big deal.
(Sorry, couldn't resist)
1. sony ereader pocket edition (currently $150 or less)
2. calibre ebook manager (free)
3. "borrowed" books from the internets
4. ???
5. PROFIT
@canarsieville
Although I have the touch version, completely agree. It's nice!
@canarsieville
Dude... Why the Sony? It's the same price as the Nook WiFi, but has fewer features. The Nook can read standard ePub books just fine (which are plentiful if you're the type to "borrow" them, as you say) and also handles PDF like a pro. On top of that you get WiFi and a web browser, and you can *still* buy books from the Sony bookstore and use them on the Nook.
I weighed the two choices, and the Nook won hands down. The only way the Sony reader is better is in terms of compact size. Otherwise, it's beat by the Nook at everything.
@ZeroCorpse I agree, but using Calibre the formats dont matter. Calibre reformats everything for me and optimizes that format for whatever ebook reader you have.
Removing that from the equation you have usability. All I wanted was a simple ebook reader and the sony does that perfectly.
Lastly, as you said, its more compact and is a much better build quality than the nook. Looks really nice and not like a cheap toy.
So at the end if you need more than just a simple ebook reader, want a larger screen then go for the nook. Otherwise, Sony is the simple choice that should last a long time.
Seems like a good alternative to me. I really like the look of it, but agree that maybe a teeny bit cheaper as the no-frills option which many of us would enjoy
They really should have realized they messed up on the firmware process when the instructions actually had to tell you to push the top of the thing up against the edge of a table to hit the third button. I mean, seriously?
Brit here, i'd happily shell out £99 for this in the UK. With the free books and the amount of other books out there for very low prices I can see this as a decent dedicated reding device. The point of it isn't to be a Ipad killer, its a dedicated device with a very specific set of functions and I think there's a market for that still.
Maybe the market is crowded, but I can't seem to find a good 8 inch reader.
@Engadget
Why do you have to bring the iPad into this? The iPad isn't an e-reader, it's a tablet computer. You're comparing two different technologies and saying that the technology that isn't relevant in the e-reader space is better.
Let it go Engadget, or you'll lose me (and probably others) as a reader.
@mboudreau In the author's defense, she referred to the iPad as a "multitasker," (meaning that it could more than a dedicated e-reader, like a laptop computer can be an e-reader). And Apple makets the iPad as an alternative to dedicated e-readers that can do more, so it's fair to mention it.
@mboudreau
Although I am not one of them, I believe many view the iPad as a device on which they also (plan to) read books. And Apple is pushing that view in their marketing as well.
So although we're dealing with two separate devices in terms of specs, the consumer might very well make the comparison between this and the iPad.
@mboudreau The iPad is commonly used for reading ebooks. I myself have read much more since having it than I did before. I think it's fair to mention multi-use competitors when talking about a single use device. For example: When speaking about gaming, it's not uncommon to place the PC next to the XB360, PS3 or Wii, even though it was designed to do much more than gaming. the bottom line is, you CAN use it for gaming, therefore it's a competitor and should be mentioned.
@DigitalOSH
Yes, but it still doesn't make sense. We're talking devices dedicated to reading like if it was a book to a computer. They're not the same. Yes, the iPad can be used to read books, but that's like saying I'll use Saran Wrap as a condom.
Saran Wrap can do multiple tasks, very well at that, and you can definitely use it to have sex with it, but there's a reason that anyone who's serious about sex will use condoms. The same logic applies here.
@DigitalOSH
Then anything with a screen can be a competitor to an e-reader.
I do most of my reading on my desktop, and the Kobo performs significantly worse than my desktop computer. Even my laptop performs better, plus it has a color screen and is also portable!
/sarcasm
E-Ink devices are a very specific category of devices, and should be judged accordingly. That being said, Pixel Qi devices are comparable because their screens very accurately mimic the E-Ink look, which regular tablets don't even attempt.
@mboudreau
The iPad comparison is a fair comparison. Some people are very light readers, and even paying as little as $150 for an e-reader plus $10 per book might be a little expensive to some people. As good as dedicated e-book readers are at their primary function... easy to read text on an e-ink screen... reading books is still a niche. Not everybody reads books.
E-book manufacturers are catering to hardcore readers to buy their products to read books... because that's all those products can do. Apple went a different route and made a device that can read books and do other things.
Of course the cheapest iPad is 3.5 times more expensive than an e-book reader, but if you factor in all of the other things the iPad can do *and* it can read books... it's actually a pretty good option for some people.
I think they will always compare the iPad to a dedicated e-reader since the iPad can read books... plus a whole lot more.
"...you can hold the 6-incher comfortably with just one hand..."
How delightfully Freudian.
I had one for a couple of days. I'm a Kobo fan and it's my iPhone reading app of choice.
I liked the reader's weight, size; and the fact that it was not an "all singing, all dancing" gadget and just showed books.
A few negatives:
Software glitches caused it to crash a lot, and it lost books. The BIG-ASS button was klunky. There were not enough words on the page as I could not get the correct combination of text size and line spacing to accommodate my preferred reading comfort.
These annoyances were a pain but each was not enough to reject it. However, the slow page refresh rate was maddening, and that was what caused me to return it.
Anyone who wants a reader and then asks 'what do they do besides books?' probably shouldnt be looking at standalone readers for starters.
Once you make a reader also function as a MID, PMP or tablet, you are required to make design changes that affect battery life and price.
The only reason I haven't jumped in yet is simply because Id like to use it as a comic reader as well so am waiting for something that can do colour as well as B&W. In about a year we'll have more options on the market for colour as well. Like many, I'm personally interested in how the notion ink goes.
I am wanting an e-book reader. I LOVE the Gutenberg and other freely available e-books from long ago. I collect antique books because of the feel and content. When I just want content I use Aldiko on my Android phone and it's the best e-reader I have found for free.
That said, I've been waiting for the e-readers to drop to about $99 and I will get one. Since I already own many of the titles I would want to read in physical format, can already read them on an electronic device and don't have need to load a butt-load of books or listen to music, browse web or other functions (I do that on my phone) I think an e-reader would fill a niche but not a big enough one to warrant more than about $100.
Thanks for the review! If they drop the price to $99 I will get one but I would rather pay the $149 and get the wifi Nook right now... I'll hold off to see what the holiday scramble for my $$ does.
Yeah, this thing is begging to be at the $99 price point. I'm also not a big fan of the big blue square at the bottom, but eh, it'd be pretty cool if the price were down 50 bucks.
In the past this reader would have been amazing.
However without some 3G connectivity and web browser any reader like this is not going to make it.
Funny story... Was visiting my mom in the city and only took my BB Bold and Kindle with me so I could read on LIRR and Subway.
My mom does not have internet and there is no open Wifi around her.
She wanted me to call her bank cause she had a question about her accounts. Was going to use my BB to call up her accounts but the screen is little too small for her to read on. So I brought up her accounts with the Kindle browser, (a little slow but not awful) and showed her what she wanted in large and paper-like clarity.
Even did a funds transfer for her. She said it was unbelievable that this thin piece of plastic could do that for her without her going to the bank. She even called the bank to make sure it actually happened.
Actually there have been plenty of times when whispernet and the kindle browser came in very handy for me. Now if only they added some features and took it out of experimental.... :)
Well remember it came out when the Nook and Kindle were $100-150 more then it, so perhaps it just hasn't adjusted for that yet.
That said, the Kobo's big push is Canada I believe, and unlike you folks in the states, we don't have access to a lot of the ereaders you do. The Kobo and the Kindle are the only modern ereaders accessible easily by the general public. Nerdy online orderings aside.
eBookwise/Fictionwise also carry the REB 1150 a backlit ancient reader of which my mother owns two. (She's been reading eBooks for 6-7 years now).
When we were looking for birthday gifts back in May, including import fees the Kindle 2 is $300ish, whereas the Kobo was $170 with tax.
- D
Stop comparing E-Ink devices to touchscreen LCD tablets like the iPad.
I've got one of these and while yes you do have to sync it with your computer via usb, it's really no different than your ipod, phone or camera. If you've never owned a kindle or nook, it's not really any different from what you're used to.
The button being on the right hand side of the device is really annoying if you're holding it in your left hand. Had they put the button in the center, you could easily reach it from either end of the device.
The Adobe Digital Editions software is a pain in the ass to use. It's all flash, no function. Go download Calibre, not a lot of flash, but definitely easier to use.
And when you're used to getting your books from the library, it sucks to have to pay $10 for every book.
Anyone know a good torrent site for epub's?
@angelusp Why in jesus christ's name would you want to watch video on an eink screen? That comment was bad and you should feel bad about it.
OMG! There is so many products that were highly anticipated that could be reviewed, and we're reading about this? Who cares about e-readers anymore!?
I'm Confused, where's the review card? I like those for comparison.
@crazypeng1 About half an inch to the right of the first picture >_>
an eReader review, sans any word on format compatibility ?
can i use it for reading PDFs? and i mean REALLY use it, as in it supports REFLOW?
I think there will be always a niche for "dedicated" hardware. Sometimes you just... don't want all those bells and whistles. I think the minimalistic design of the Kobo is good. One thing this artice didn't mention is that the software support on the Kobo has been good in comparisson to other *cough* SONY *cough* readers.
Also, the slow refresh rate is due to the lower price (which when it came out was remarkably cheaper than the competition... Kindle, Sony and Nook). Nowadays they might really need to adjust the price for surviving. For me... I like my sony prs-505, no bells and whistles and it feels great with it's leather cover... and I got it at the same price some years ago =P
GJMS
Remember that when this was first released (at $150), the Nook and Kindle were up in the $200-250 range. It was Kobo's release that scared them down to the $150 they're at now, and chances are Kobo has more overhead to reduce it's price even more.
I've been lusting after one of these at my local Chapters (Who had them here in Canada before anyone else in the US), and at $150 it's a little expensive for an impulse purchase, but a good investment. I think, however, it's going to drop in price some (Hopefully to $99, probably to $125) quite soon, at which point it's firmly in "Impulse purchase" territory, and will be coming home with me. :)
@Anaerin
I give it a year, maybe two until e-readers are $100 for the lower end models.
@Anaerin I do not think any of them were scared of the Kobo since it has so many missing features from the other two. I do think Amazon is wants to make sure they the low priced one but they are only after those that have comparable features that is why they are not priced at the Nook Wifi model.
The computer is not the only wayto get books on it. If you one of kobo's phone apps it will sync with the phone over Bluetooth.