Timex Ironman Global Trainer review
Running has changed quite a bit as an activity over the last decade or so. Moisture-wicking (or "technical") clothing has become commonplace, portable media players are small and light enough to not be a hinderance, and GPS watches and other gadgets have emerged on the scene and rapidly come down in price. While some may think those devices are reserved for only the most serious runners, they can actually be a great tool for those just starting out as well.
One of the latest such gadgets is Timex's Ironman Global Trainer, the company's first true GPS sports watch (previous models relied on a separate GPS module), and one of the few rivals to Garmin's well-established Forerunner line. How does it stack up? Timex kindly let us put the watch through its paces so we could find out. Read on for our review.
One of the latest such gadgets is Timex's Ironman Global Trainer, the company's first true GPS sports watch (previous models relied on a separate GPS module), and one of the few rivals to Garmin's well-established Forerunner line. How does it stack up? Timex kindly let us put the watch through its paces so we could find out. Read on for our review.
Hardware

The first thing you'll notice is that the Timex Ironman Global Trainer is big -- much bigger than you'd think from simply looking at the press shots of the device. While it definitely has a more watch-like appearance, it's actually a bit bigger than Garmin's older Forerunner 305, which remains one of the more popular GPS watches on the market (and arguably delivers the most bang for the buck -- check the gallery for a few comparison shots). The weight of the Timex is a bit more balanced, however, which makes it slightly more comfortable to wear, but the difference between the two is really negligible once you're actually out running. Anyone with small wrists will definitely want to try one on before buying, though.
Of course, the size is largely a result of the watch's GPS capabilities which, like most of Garmin's watches, consists of a SiRFstarIII GPS chipset. That doesn't necessarily mean the watches will perform equally, however, and while things were a bit hit and miss, we found that our Forerunner 305 generally acquired a signal faster than the Timex and was able to more consistently acquire a signal in difficult situations -- indoors near a window, for instance. Others have also noted that the Timex seems to measures distance a bit short compared to Garmin's watches, and we also found that to be the case in our tests -- although we only noticed a discrepancy of about eleven meters per kilometer (not quite the 2.5 percent difference others have reported). Those issues could seemingly be fixed with a firmware update, however, and DC Rainmaker reports that an early firmware update he tested did greatly improve the watch's ability to acquire a signal -- we tested the watch with the most recent, publicly available firmware.
Where the Global Trainer really distinguishes itself, however, is in its design. Not only does it actually look like a regular sports watch (albeit a large one), but it has seven big, easy-to-press buttons (three on either side and a start / split button on front) that makes using it while running a breeze -- which isn't always the case on some competing watches. Those buttons surround a 1.5-inch display (the same size as the Garmin), which is able to display up to four different data fields of your choice at once (pace, distance, heart rate, etc.) -- and this being a Timex, the watch also has an Indiglo backlight, although that's actually quite a bit less bright than some other backlights out there.
Just as importantly, the watch is also about as durable and water-resistant (to 50 meters) as you could hope for, and it's of course equally well-suited for swimming and biking as well -- unfortunately, the same can't be said for this reviewer. For a detailed look at those capabilities, we'd recommend taking a look at DC Rainmaker's review.
Accessories
Of course, the size is largely a result of the watch's GPS capabilities which, like most of Garmin's watches, consists of a SiRFstarIII GPS chipset. That doesn't necessarily mean the watches will perform equally, however, and while things were a bit hit and miss, we found that our Forerunner 305 generally acquired a signal faster than the Timex and was able to more consistently acquire a signal in difficult situations -- indoors near a window, for instance. Others have also noted that the Timex seems to measures distance a bit short compared to Garmin's watches, and we also found that to be the case in our tests -- although we only noticed a discrepancy of about eleven meters per kilometer (not quite the 2.5 percent difference others have reported). Those issues could seemingly be fixed with a firmware update, however, and DC Rainmaker reports that an early firmware update he tested did greatly improve the watch's ability to acquire a signal -- we tested the watch with the most recent, publicly available firmware.
Where the Global Trainer really distinguishes itself, however, is in its design. Not only does it actually look like a regular sports watch (albeit a large one), but it has seven big, easy-to-press buttons (three on either side and a start / split button on front) that makes using it while running a breeze -- which isn't always the case on some competing watches. Those buttons surround a 1.5-inch display (the same size as the Garmin), which is able to display up to four different data fields of your choice at once (pace, distance, heart rate, etc.) -- and this being a Timex, the watch also has an Indiglo backlight, although that's actually quite a bit less bright than some other backlights out there.
Just as importantly, the watch is also about as durable and water-resistant (to 50 meters) as you could hope for, and it's of course equally well-suited for swimming and biking as well -- unfortunately, the same can't be said for this reviewer. For a detailed look at those capabilities, we'd recommend taking a look at DC Rainmaker's review.
Accessories

Inside the box you'll find a USB charging / sync cable (with a clip-on mechanism to attach to the watch), an AC adapter attachment for said cable, a bike mount, and, if you opted for the bundle, a heart rate monitor. That latter item is as close to a must-have accessory as there is, but the watch will work with any ANT+ heart rate monitor if you happen to have one already or would prefer to add one later. You can also use the watch with a bike power meter, but Timex has curiously chosen not to offer any support for footpods, which doesn't exactly make the watch an ideal option for anyone that spends a lot time on treadmill.
Software

The software side of things is separated into components: the Timex device agent application that lets you transfer data to your computer and configure the watch (much easier than fiddling with settings on the watch itself), and Timex's Ironman website, which is simply a rebranded version of the TrainingPeaks website.
While the device trainer is simple and straightforward enough (although with a few quirks -- you have to press the erase button after each download to avoid duplicating data the next time), the web-based component is more of a mixed bag. On the upside, TrainingPeaks gives you a good deal more flexibility than Garmin's similar Connect offers, including everything from meal and nutrition tracking to an equipment list that'll let you keep an eye on how many miles your putting on your sneakers (and even more if you upgrade to the premium version). On the downside, the interface leaves a bit to be desired, and the sheer number of options at your disposal can be a bit overwhelming for beginners or those only interested in keeping track of the basics. You also can't simply upload data directly from the watch to the website, as you can with Garmin Connect.
One other note: while Timex is advertising the watch as both Mac and PC compatible, there's still no Mac device agent as of this writing -- Timex says it will be available sometime next month.
There's no question that the Ironman Global Trainer stands out from the current crop of GPS watches. It's tough and water-resistant enough to truly live up to the Ironman name, and it's appearance alone is no doubt enough to get some folks interested. What we haven't mentioned so far is the price. At the moment, the Ironman Global Trainer is available exclusively from REI for $250 (or $300 for the heart rate bundle), and will be available from other retailers worldwide this September. For comparison, the Garmin Forerunner 305 is now available for as little as $150 (including a heart rate monitor). Of course, the Global Trainer does offer a number of advantages, but it does also come up short in a few areas that may make it a tough sell for some people. The good news is that many of the watch's issues (apart from its size) can seemingly be remedied with firmware updates and, if it gets discounted a bit from its full list price following its expanded launch next month, it may well become an even more attractive option.
While the device trainer is simple and straightforward enough (although with a few quirks -- you have to press the erase button after each download to avoid duplicating data the next time), the web-based component is more of a mixed bag. On the upside, TrainingPeaks gives you a good deal more flexibility than Garmin's similar Connect offers, including everything from meal and nutrition tracking to an equipment list that'll let you keep an eye on how many miles your putting on your sneakers (and even more if you upgrade to the premium version). On the downside, the interface leaves a bit to be desired, and the sheer number of options at your disposal can be a bit overwhelming for beginners or those only interested in keeping track of the basics. You also can't simply upload data directly from the watch to the website, as you can with Garmin Connect.
One other note: while Timex is advertising the watch as both Mac and PC compatible, there's still no Mac device agent as of this writing -- Timex says it will be available sometime next month.
Wrap-up
There's no question that the Ironman Global Trainer stands out from the current crop of GPS watches. It's tough and water-resistant enough to truly live up to the Ironman name, and it's appearance alone is no doubt enough to get some folks interested. What we haven't mentioned so far is the price. At the moment, the Ironman Global Trainer is available exclusively from REI for $250 (or $300 for the heart rate bundle), and will be available from other retailers worldwide this September. For comparison, the Garmin Forerunner 305 is now available for as little as $150 (including a heart rate monitor). Of course, the Global Trainer does offer a number of advantages, but it does also come up short in a few areas that may make it a tough sell for some people. The good news is that many of the watch's issues (apart from its size) can seemingly be remedied with firmware updates and, if it gets discounted a bit from its full list price following its expanded launch next month, it may well become an even more attractive option.




























Mesa would not get lost in Naboo with this. Mesa could even go to a swim. Mesa happy.
@JarJar what the.......
@JarJar
Am I the only one that HATED Jar jar Binks?
@BigJayDogg3 No, no you are not. Not by a long shot.
@JarJar. I thought I felt the presence of a Gungan on this page. I killed you once i can kill you again, Gungans are not *welcome* on Engadget
@JarJar What is this, I don't even??
@JarJar
That is easily the most bizarre comment I've read outside of 4chan.
@JarJar You Guys (Engadget that is) Should do some Tokyo Flash Watch Reviews.
@EA575
Me too. And for that, I would like to dispatch the person who wrote it. I feel like my mind has just been violated.
@Lord Vader FINISH HIM!!
@JarJar
JarJar - RTFA - DC Rainmaker says no GPS below 30cm of water.
No swim for you!
@EA575
lmao, I've tried to stop encouraging these Star Wars commenters but I can't, I just lol IRL...
I use Nike+ with other shoes, but before I sold my iPhone (still have the Nike+ watch band), I found an app called MapMyRun and also one called MapMyRide. Never got around to using them but they looked pretty good and even have a website. Wish Nike+ could have used the GPS feature, but oh well. At least I still have the same function with the watch band, minus gps and possible heart rate monitor and lap times.
@aopolis Glad to see a review on this though, was interested in these as well & maybe will be in the future unless all phones start doing the same.
@aopolis & really wish the Nike+ band had a freaking backlight LOL. It's great for a watch though, never wore Livestrong type bands but prefer it over a big round thing on my wrist.
@aopolis
I've always wanted to like these watches but despise wearing the chest strap heart rate monitor.
@rutter9 You think they could develop a way to pick up your pulse since it is on your wrist.
That thing looks like it's bigger than most of the aforementioned portable music devices.
@NHowe
That's what she said.
@Johnny Tremaine Giggity.
Swatch called... they said put their shit back in the early 90's post haste.
Is there a Linux client in the works?
Sorta sad that Timex couldn't come out with something that is better than an old model Garmin in the end. The 405 I owned was a disaster, with a terribly hard to control touch-bezel and a lot of other flaws.
And why not SirfPrima or a newer chipset at least?
Frankly these devices all seem to suffer from a lack of execution that is shameful. The interfaces suck, and I can only hope that Apple's entry into the sports market continues to improve to something that can be used seriously.
Also,a bit more about features would be nice, since this "review" is pretty thin: Can I ghost-race myself? Can I do it in segments of my run? Can I set up Tabata intervals or other types of custom interval sequences? How well will it handle sprints and short runs - will the software just let me start the watch, line-up in blocks, and then let me see my 100 meter time or 400 meter time without me having to fumble for buttons?
@akatsuki I know it sounds weird to go back a model number, but have you tried the Garmin 305? That's what I have, an honestly I think the 405, while obviously sleeker, is really a step back in terms of functionality. I personally haven't used the 405, so I can't speak to its software, but I think the 305 handles custom interval sets and just about anything else you could throw at it with ease. I run, road bike, cross-country ski, and rollerski, and my 305 tells me everything I could possibly want to know (except for lactate levels, of course) in a well-presented UI.
I love my Garmin 305 (and the 205 before it), but I'm glad to see some competition in the area.
I will say that I don't like how close the start and split buttons are to each other. Also, you don't mention how many possible data fields are available compared to the Garmin.
@jalaram "Start / split" is actually just one button, and I did mention the number of data fields: up to four, the same as the Garmin.
Isn't that the same thing they put on people on house arrest?
can someone suggest for me a nice waterproof heart rate monitor??
i still havent found a decent one for swimming
@dark star
Polar is the only HRM that works in water.
@aleers it works as long as it's not the WIND HRM....if you have an analog HRM from Polar, it works.
I have the RS800 and the WIND transmitter does NOT work under water...it loses it for some reason. So for swimming I'm HRM-less...unless I'm wearing my wetsuit in a race...but then again, I'm in Houston and how often does that happen?!
@aleers
Nope, my Timex works underwater.
While I love my Garmin ForeRunner 305, the watch is a bit large. Also, the ForeRunner range is not cheap and the price goes up pretty quickly once you go beyond the 305.
I'm glad there is competition in this area - I may look at this in a few years if I need a watch/HRM for swimming.
@GdgtMan Is Garmin 305 even water capable? It is multi-sport but not water proof...so no ironman.
@mola
The Garmin 310 is water capable...it even has a new open water swim function which tries to figure out the distance swam (even though GPS does not work underwater).
This is a quick and dirty first look...
After reading the very thourough review over at DCRainmaker.com I decided to get the Garmin 310xt. He has reviews of both watches. I was able to get the 310xt with HR monitor for less than the Timex and I have a much more mature product. I'll be racing with it in a Sprint triathlon this weekend. It's a good training utility with quite a lot of features.
No thanks it's Suunto for me. Polar isn't bad either.
This is why I love Engadget. Thank you DarthVader for killing that annoying ass Gungan.
The best software for tracking your training has got to be Sportstracks so really it doesn't matter about the software side of things, mainly just the hardware since ST will download off most GPS units.
http://www.zonefivesoftware.com/SportTracks/
I don't work for them but am a very happy customer and a new version is coming soon too, just thought I would chime in and let anyone here know that's interested.
This Ironman watch looks good, I own a Garmin 405 and the bezel is a nightmare to use. I personally think the 310XT is probably the best on the market right now.
@henleyb weird, I just got a 405 and haven't had any issues with the bezel at all.
@TheAngryIntern
Wait till you get sweaty or it rains, then it's a real pain to change screens.
@TheAngryIntern Agreed with the others that the bezel of the 405 is a disaster once you sweat, or it's raining outside. I love the watch otherwise, but if I'm doing a long run I know I need to set it to the screen I want, and often lock the bezel, or risk it changing screens at some point and not being able to adjust it again due to moisture on the bezel.
or i can just use runkeeper.
Suunto for me but thinking about jumping ship. The Timex would be interesting if it was 200 or less. Why is it that these so called specialty devices cost so much (rhetorical). If I was willing to risk ruining my phone, (I have H2O arm band and earphones but I still will not risk my phone training everyday), I would have a far superior GPS device as well as a smartphone. Margin on these must be huge! I have a Suunto that cost more than my Incredible and still isn't as good a solution as it could be....
Its all a bit fail, they nerf data collection because the memory storage isnt sufficient to store the memory of a whole Ironman, you'd think the key objective of a training device called 'Ironman' would allow a person to collect all the data they can about the event they participate in.
Garmin 4life
I've been using motionx gps lite on the iPhone when I go running. Does pretty much everything all these expensive watches do for free minus the heartrate. I was about to spend ~300 on a watch.
I just got a Garmin Forerunner 405 about a month ago. I love it, it's so nice to have the distance and pace information right there on my wrist. Plus it's fun to try out new routes and then be able to see them on a map and know exactly how far you went.
just re-reading the excellent DC Rainmaker review he said it dropped out after 5 hours??! are they insane? After 4 hours on the bike my Garmin Edge 500 usually has 80% battery life and the forerunner is similar - how would you do an Ironman on that battery?!?!
Re the iphone comment its not the same at all, the iphone / driod is grabbing data every 5 seconds, these are working every second, I get several k/h disparity between a phone and a garmin, not to mention the differents in splits etc - it isnt really worth comparing them though I agree a phone does a good enough job if you are just mildly interested - used sportypal for months before getting the real thing
Woah...this is weird. I was JUST looking at these things online this morning because I'm getting tired of my Galaxy S not tracking me accurately. I was trying to decide if I should get one or wait until the "fix" in Sept. As of now I'm trying to be patient and I'm going to wait for the "fix".
I haven't had a Timex watch in Hellas.
If you want to all of these features and more (heart rate, bike power, weight scales, bike speed/cadence, etc) and you have an iPhone then these guys have something coming out on Monday (www.wahoofitness.com). I got my hands on a beta release and it's great!