consequences
Latest
Player vs. Everything: Factions should matter
Yesterday's Daily Grind asked an interesting question: Should reputation matter? In the post, Akela discusses how you often have to grind for reputation in World of Warcraft in order to purchase some items, weapons, and armor that are specific to that faction. He points out that there's no real purpose to having such reputations from a story perspective, other than to demonstrate the idea that your character is willing to get his hands bloody for the promise of some nice items (eventually). Bloodthirsty mercenaries, the lot of you! He goes on to say that such faction systems only really matter in games where your choices are meaningful and have a lasting impact with consequences, and are made obsolete by the very nature of an MMOG. If you can spend 10 hours farming and reverse the impact of the choices you make, have you really made a meaningful choice at all? I don't at all agree that faction systems are pointless in MMOGs, but I think that Akela makes an excellent point about something: Without meaningful choices, you may as well not have factions. I think that this point is especially relevant today because we have a whole generation of gamers being trained by Blizzard to think of reputation/favor/factions only the way that WoW does it--- as a grind you perform for specific items or rewards from various groups of NPCs, each with their own agenda. Unfortunately, in Blizzard's world, none of these factions seem to be at odds or conflicting with one another. Even in the limited cases that they are, the choices you make are largely meaningless. Aldor or Scryer? Pfft. Either way you hang out in Shattrath and get roughly analogous rewards. Magram or Gelkis? Either way you kill a bunch of centaur and get next to nothing for your effort. I can't even think of any more opposed factions in the game. Booty Bay and the Pirates, maybe? My point is this: This is not what factions are supposed to be about. These are watered-down, little-kid, lame excuses for a faction system. So what exactly is the point of faction then?
An interview with Masthead Studios' CEO
Mark Arsenault of MPOGD.com sat down with Atanas Atanasov, CEO of Masthead Studios, and grilled him about their upcoming post-apocalyptic MMO, Earthrise. It's a very lengthy and intriguing interview chock-full of good stuff.Earthrise will offer a "true sandbox experience" and give plays unparalleled freedom, including the ability to customize almost every aspect of the character. PvP will be a very important part of the game and is tided into the lore, which has players fighting for control over pieces of a ravaged pacific island called Enterra. As such, players will be able to attack any other player (at any time) if they are in a non-secure area.As we mentioned in an article a few days ago, every item will be crafted by the players. Atanasov gives even more details about this game mechanic. Apparently players will be able to "overclock" certain items. Instead of providing static effects, players will be able to actually define the effect value of an item. Forcing that value to high ("overclocking" it) is a risk/reward scenario. Push it too high and it might fry the component completely; push it just right, and ya got yourself something truly unique.While I'm not a big crafter, this feature sounds fantastic and may lend itself to some very sweet loot that I'm sure the game's economic system will benefit from. Closed beta begins this summer with open beta occurring just prior to release.
Earthrise to do what reality doesn't
Three new questions were asked by the Earthrise community for the devs at Masthead Studios to answer. While all three give us a bit more insight into the game, the biggest question had to do with PvP. Specifically, will players actually be able to attack people in their own faction.The short answer is: Yes. Because Earthrise's setting is a dynamic and "edgy" place the devs didn't want players to have to play by their rules. While players will be able to attack and even kill members of their own faction, it doesn't mean the act won't go without consequences. Something that appears to be missing in today's reality. Murdering -- and that's what it really boils down to -- people within your own faction is one of the most egregious acts a player can commit. Clearing your name will be very difficult, plus your actions will have consequences out in the wild by becoming a target for other criminals. Much more is revealed about the game mechanics, and the more I read about this game, the more I want to play it. If you're interested in this post apocalyptic sci-fi MMO set in the distant future, be sure to give it a read.
Is there any real honor in PvP?
In reading through my list of video game blogs I came across a fascinating post on Got Game. Andrew Whelps discusses how he views the WoW PvP battle system to be one without honor, since the battle has no real consequence. It's a "dirty war" sort of scenario, wrapped in an idealized fantasy. Interesting to contemplate really. The notion that our battle has no consequence to the real world is valid. We run our battles either in instances, or in the world. In the instances, we have no context as to why we must kill, only know we are there to defeat the enemy. We hate them, therefore they must die. The NPCs will respawn, the opposing faction will resurrect, no harm done. We perform brutal acts that have no affect on our environment. If we raid Crossroads or Lakeshire the towns do not burn, the landscape remains unchanged.
