Latest in Analysis

Image credit:

iPhone 4 antenna woes contextualized by dude in the know

Vlad Savov
06.25.10
20 Shares
Share
Tweet
Share
Save

Sponsored Links

It's the ultimate of ironies that Apple's externalized antenna array in the iPhone 4 -- hoped (and hyped up) to finally give us a phone every bit as good the rest of the device -- has become the cause of most rancor in the immediate aftermath of the handset's release. This morning you'll be rubbing both sleep and disbelief out of your eyes as you read that Apple's response to some people's reception problems with the 4 is to hold it differently. But, before we start ostracizing Apple as the singular offender here, let's hear from a man in the know.

Spencer Webb runs AntennaSys, a company that designs tailormade RF solutions, and has himself worked on making quad-band transceivers for AT&T. As he tells it, almost all phone makers have now transitioned to locating their antennae at the bottom of the phones. This has been in order to move radio wave emissions away from the head (a shortcoming that a top-mounted aerial would incur), which the FCC has been quite demanding about with its SAR standards --
The iPhone 4, however, moved the antenna action from the back of the phone to the sides. This probably improves the isotropy of the radiation pattern, but only when the phone is suspended magically in air.
Another great point made here is that testing done both by the Federales and mobile carriers might include the head, but never accounts for the presence of the person's hand. Thus, although a phone's antenna could test very well, it might suffer from such issues as those experienced with the iPhone 4. Mind you, this still seems like an assembly (rather than design) problem to us, since most of our editors haven't had any reception worries and we in fact saw improved performance on that front while conducting our review testing. Spencer himself has decided to buy the phone knowing full well about this potential limitation, and concludes on the note that "sometimes an antenna that's not great, but good enough, is good enough."

All products recommended by Engadget are selected by our editorial team, independent of our parent company. Some of our stories include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, we may earn an affiliate commission.
Share
20 Shares
Share
Tweet
Share
Save

Popular on Engadget

HyperX just made its Cloud Alpha gaming headset even better

HyperX just made its Cloud Alpha gaming headset even better

View
Spotify's Premium Family plans get an explicit content filter

Spotify's Premium Family plans get an explicit content filter

View
NVIDIA ray-tracing on 'Minecraft' looks surprisingly cool

NVIDIA ray-tracing on 'Minecraft' looks surprisingly cool

View
MIT experts find a way to reduce video stream buffering on busy WiFi

MIT experts find a way to reduce video stream buffering on busy WiFi

View
NASA selects proposals for smallsats built to study deep space

NASA selects proposals for smallsats built to study deep space

View

From around the web

Page 1Page 1ear iconeye iconFill 23text filevr