TomTom GO 740 LIVE impressions

Gallery: TomTom GO 740 LIVE
As we alluded to, the GO 740 LIVE is pretty much a standard fare 4.3-inch PND in terms of design. It's slim enough, fairly sexy and possesses a single hard button: the one that turns it on and off. If you've used a TomTom unit within the past year, you'll be immediately familiar with the user interface and maps. At first glance, nothing here is noteworthy or different -- just the same TomTom look and feel we've grown to love and hate (mostly hate).
Obviously, the biggest differentiator here is the connected nature. Unlike every other TomTom navigation unit in America, this one packs a built-in SIM card and the ability to suck down live (or almost live) information to make your drive easier and your travel decisions ones that are more informed. Sounds good, right? In theory, sure. In practice, we can't say we were wowed by the limited array of connected options, and we weren't super stoked by the accuracy, either.

Before we get into all of that, we will say that even though the resistive touchscreen still has too much "give" (it's mushy, what can we say?), it's leaps and bounds better than TomTom screens of yesteryear. That said, the screen is still too washed out and lacks enough brightness to be used enjoyably in broad daylight (compared to similarly priced alternatives). We know, that comes across as harsh, but in the world of $100 PNDs, one expects the $400 flagship to pack some serious heat in order to justify the gap.
Functionally, the GPS is perfectly average. It accepts your inputs, it creates a route and it gets you there. Reliably and deliberately, but with a map screen that's just downright ugly. But honestly, you could read pretty much any review for any other 4.3-inch TomTom and figure out whether TomTom's offerings are right for you; it's the connected features that you're here to read about, so that's what we'll key in on.

We aren't ones for beating around the proverbial bush, so we'll just come right out and say it: there's no way we'd shell out four Benjamins for a PND, only to start ponying up $9.95 per month to keep it connected once the three months of included service expired. We tend to spend a good bit of time on the highways, but considering that we own a pretty capable smartphone with a data plan, there's practically no value proposition to speak of. And before you start barking at us, let us point out that the public at large seems to feel the same way about pay-per-month connected GPS systems.
In fact, Navigon (among others) decided to start making traffic updates free for life before it pulled out of the North American navigation market altogether, and we'll give the connected GPS market another 12 months or so before all of these fancy extras are also provided gratis. Why? They just aren't worth ten bones a month. For starters, any decent smartphone with a data plan can largely do everything this connected GPS can do, and more. Looking for the cheapest gas nearby? There's an app for that. Need to know what eateries are nearby? Oh, there's an app for that. Need to Google something? There's definitely an app for that. And we're not just talking about the iPhone -- WinMo, S60 and BlackBerry devices have no issue finding this stuff either.

The only truly worthwhile connected extra is the so-called "live traffic update." The problem, however, is that these updates are often not live enough. During a weekend jaunt, we were rolling eastbound on a major freeway for 30 or so miles at the posted speed limit, and our GO 740 LIVE was all systems go. Suddenly, we came around a bend and quickly slowed to a halt; a minor traffic accident had about half a mile of vehicles backed up, and considering that our TomTom let us whiz by an exit 0.2 miles back, we were forced to just wait things out and squeeze by on the lone open lane. Understand our frustration?
To be fair, it's not necessarily TomTom's fault that traffic updates often aren't nearly as real-time as they need to be. For years now, we've found that pretty much every connected navigation tool we've used -- from standalone GPS devices to smartphone-based routing applications -- shows noticeable lag when it comes to alerting you to upcoming traffic issues. So yeah, we'd be willing to deal with hit-or-miss traffic updates for the grand total of $0.00 per month, but we're definitely not shelling out $9.95 / month just to hope and pray that alerts hit our navigator before we're three inches away from four hundred immobile motorcars.

Furthermore, connected applications took far, far too long to load during testing. Trying to check the local weather forecast? Expect to wait a minute or two for the GO 740 LIVE to queue up the data; meanwhile, you can get the information you're after and reply to a few emails on your handset. For those with no smartphone and no data plan, the connected features are certainly more appealing, but we still argue they aren't worth $120 per year. Spotty traffic alerts, slow-to-load weather forecasts and marginally stale fuel price updates just aren't worth paying extra for, especially after you just laid down so much money for the device itself. None of this information is absolutely vital to you getting from Point A to Point B, and even the tyro driver knows ahead of time which roadways are susceptible to traffic jams (I-95 into Washington, DC at 5:00PM ET, anyone?).

We'd like to make clear that we're really not setting our expectations too high. In fact, we'd happily deal with the erratic / slow updates if the services were included gratis, but in today's market place, anything forced upon a consumer on a monthly basis should be strikingly good. As much as we'd love to love the GO 740 LIVE, we just can't recommend it so long as TomTom keeps charging you for the privilege of ownership. And -- just in case the industry is watching -- that goes for anyone out there trying to generate recurring revenue from lackluster PND extras.


















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Eric @ May 12th 2009 11:07AM
Pass. Wouldn't be nuts about another monthly fee, and I don't use my GPS all the time either.
I just bought a Magellan Maestro 4370, and I have the VPak for my LG Dare, combined together tell me where I am, and keep me connected.
Sergio Pereira @ May 12th 2009 1:56PM
I, for one, do everything I can to not buy anything with recurring expenses, like monthly plans, refills, cartridges, etc. If I was on the market for a good GPS it's more likely I'd buy a $500 device than a $400 one with a monthly fee.
Uchiha Sasuke @ May 12th 2009 11:08AM
I'll be the first one to say that is not better than the Iphone since this cannot play Crisis and we'll not blend well with my other car accessories.
AndrewNoNumbers @ May 12th 2009 8:24PM
List of fails:
-"First" claim
-iPhone comparison
-Can it play Crysis?
-Crisis? whuzdat?
-Will it blend? (with..)
numerwan @ May 12th 2009 11:08AM
Giz tore them a new A-Hole... and i laughed lol
http://gizmodo.com/5249716/why-tomtom-sucks
with iphones, androids and other smartphones out there getting A-GPS and such, these items should def. have stronger GPS capabilities and stick to the basics... And you know damn well im not paying an extra 9.95 a month for a GPS... i think it'd be more useful in traffic ridden cities for traffic updates, but the last product that i got with "traffic updates" sucked big time... by the time it told me there was traffic, i had already sat the 20 minute wait and was nearing home...
Al @ May 12th 2009 11:25AM
All that whining and complaining reminds me of why gizmodo is the worst gadget blog ever.
TheSuburbanWhiteBoy @ May 12th 2009 11:35AM
If you have an iphone you really don't need anything else
John Doe @ May 12th 2009 11:45AM
Right...iphone does turn-by-turn navigation (with TTS), has a loud speakerphone, would last 5 hours doing gps stuff along with searching and integrating traffic?
Jon @ May 12th 2009 11:47AM
@TheSuburbanWhiteBoy:
Yeah, you don't need anything else...... unless you want 3D turn-by-turn nav.
shompol @ Aug 6th 2009 1:03PM
Gizmodo review does have a lot of whining and author's points are mostly invalid. Read user comments just below that article. My TomTom6 on WinMo is more usable than a relatively fresh Garmin Nuvi (a dedicated unit), and I used both extensively.
crawdad689 @ May 12th 2009 11:22AM
God damn, that thing is ugly (hardware and software), completely useless (for just about anyone w/ a modern smartphone), and extremely overpriced (no caveats, here).
Layne @ May 12th 2009 5:28PM
Even without a dataplan, you can do some quick searching using Google (http://www.google.com/intl/en_us/mobile/default/sms.html). Weather, Movie times, Driving directions, Phone numbers, IMDB references, etc. All you need is a texting plan (or the cash to pay as you go).
bdav @ May 12th 2009 11:22AM
What is so special about this device that gives them the right to charge $400 for it? I know its not at all convinient and I mean this for value comparison purposes only, but you could buy a netbook, gps adapter, bluetooth to your cell for less than $400.
John Doe @ May 12th 2009 11:43AM
Buy nuvi 760 (or comparable Tom Tom) for about $200 and get 4.3" touchscreen, TTS, bluetooth FM transmitter, multi-point routing...ALL in one package.
John Doe @ May 12th 2009 11:39AM
I guess this device competes with Garmin's MSN Direct features. If you want these features, then you gotta pay them, but MSN's service is way cheaper ($49.95/yr.) as opposed to this ($9.95/mo.)
I have not used these, just bought a nuvi 760 and am happy with it.
forums @ May 12th 2009 11:44AM
I just wanted to say Thank You Engadget. This was a refreshing review of a new consumer product. I tired of consumer product reviews only looking at the good in products just to chase that elusive marketing dollar.
Keep up the good work!
barry99705 @ May 12th 2009 11:44AM
I tether my tomtom with my winmo phone, why would I pay an additional $10 a month to not use the phone, that's most likely going to be attached to my belt anyway? My tomtom is also my hands free unit when I'm in the car, and that's mostly what it gets used for 90% of the time. I know where I'm going on the average driving day.
Joylove @ May 12th 2009 11:53AM
I had one of the EU versions for a week, sent it back yesterday because it can't get a signal in my car with the laminataed windscreen, and this model does not have an external GPS antenna unlike the previous versions.
Impresions were that the GSM interferes with the FM radio in the car, the bluetooth doesn't support images of the caller, the fact it only comes bundled with 3 months Live! subscriptions instead of 12 months, and the fact that it displays on the TomTom Home program that it wanted me to pay £29.99 to get the latest maps when the item was just 1 hour old* made this a dissapointingly expensive product to buy and run. Oh and all the celebrity voices are about £6 each. Money pit.
*later on I found a buried menu that updated them for free, but a less tech savvy parent might well have paid up.
karthik13 @ May 12th 2009 12:29PM
Can't help, but that would be "privilege" and not "priveledge".
Sorry again :P
Noah Lieske @ May 12th 2009 1:51PM
I'll wait until it costs 10$. And this will happen soon. Noah Lieske
DangerZone1223 @ May 12th 2009 1:09PM
I have a TomTom One and I absolutely love it. It has impressed me on NUMEROUS occasions. It even mapped out a gated apartment complex. Sure, that's probably standard, but it impressed me. Also, while driving in the middle of the dessert in Nevada, it would show the highway going over small creeks. If I ever need to know where something is that the directory doesn't have, GOOG411 is my friend. Plus, for TomTom's community support, free updates, voices, and other goodies, it's well worth it.
However, for traffic updates, I never bothered. I used to live in LA, so I was stuck in traffic every time I got on the road! If I was really gridlocked, I'd just calculate a new route. Not hard!
terryandbella @ May 12th 2009 1:58PM
I just spent a month settling on a GPS for my car. I looked at the Tom-Toms next to a Garmin, and nearly puked at just how bad Tom-Toms GUI is done. Way to much info on the main screen, while missing some very important stuff (street name at the top???) The maps are very plain, and frankly, seem worse then what I used to have with my iPaq in the late 90's!
I just settled on the Garmin 755T and ordered the MSN-Direct cable for a total of $375. I have lifetime FM based traffic with one power adapter, and 12 months of MSN direct included with the other. In my area (Twin Cities) the traffic system is very advanced and works very very well. The first day I had it, i was confused by a route it send me on after hearing it stated "Extreme Traffic Ahead". Turns out 20 miles ahead on my route a trackor trailer rolled not more then 5 minutes before, and it sent me clear around the entire jam up, saving me about an hour of travel time.
The MSN-Direct gas feature is so-so accurate about 50% of the time, but the doppler radar is great so far, and traffic is close to spot on. The 3-D maps and building are great, and have dual mode lane assist (one small icon in the upper left telling you what lanes work, and a full screen fairly true to life depication of the interchange) are spot on so far.
The cost is great, free traffic, or for 49.95 a year after 12 months, I can keep all of the MSN-Direct features.
outphase84 @ May 12th 2009 10:52PM
Few things to note, as a former Garmin and current TomTom user.
You can adjust how much or how little info you want it to show you. If you realy wanted, you could just make it show your next turn ahead.
Map scrolling and recalculations for a missed turn on the GO 720/730 are significantly faster and smoother than on Garmin's units.
The street name is displayed at the bottom, and the next street you will turn onto is shown on the top. That said, current street name is a toggle-able option.
Newer TomToms also have the advanced lane guidance, with icons for smaller interchanges and full-screen images for larger.
I will admit that the Garmin has a "prettier" interface, however the TomToms are simply more usable. I find nearly everything on them quicker to do, especially while driving. My only complaint is that TomToms have you input street name before house number, but other than that I find it more usable.
laz_ee_b @ May 12th 2009 2:07PM
Does this version not allow you to get these services through a "wireless data connection" with your phone? Previous TomTom models with bluetooth would work with your phone's data plan to get the information free. Is that no longer an option? It would certainly solve your whole dilemma.
mobert @ May 12th 2009 2:33PM
I had a tom tom and found their customer service to be terrible. There was no one to talk to or get help from if your unit continually freezes. Also, it had old maps on it when I got it new and they wouldn't give me new maps saying that they couldn't help it if I got one that had been sitting on a shelf in the store. Maps are expensive. I found Verizon Navigator on my phone did everything the tom tom did plus traffic alerts, up to date maps and POI's. The POI's on Verizon seem to be anything that was listed in the phone book. I will never buy a tom tom again.
IdleInvest @ May 12th 2009 3:04PM
I love TomTom but that's a little steep!
jonhoffm @ May 12th 2009 9:24PM
I have been a long-time supporter of tomtom, but I completely agree that the idea of a monthly charge for this service is ridiculous and almost insulting.
To those who find MSN Direct reliable and useful, all I can say is wow - you must have less than a 20 mile commute to a city center. In Chicago, at least, it is worthless outside of that.
YouFaceTheTick @ May 12th 2009 11:15PM
Waste of money. Self-contained navi units are the same as 1908s pocket calculators. Only they're being made obsolete even faster...
Like watches and calculators and PDAs, soon Navi will just be a part of every cell phone.
idom @ May 13th 2009 4:47AM
Interesting contrast to this review:
http://www.gpsreview.net/tomtom-740-live/#more-2362
Especially read the section about traffic accuracy.
Koen @ May 13th 2009 10:06AM
Hi there Americans!
I am the happy owner of a Dutch model of the TomTom 940 HD Traffic, which has everything which is available in "your TomTom 740"... except this:
In Europe, TomTom sells the 740 model with only European maps. In the US only with American maps (correct??). We - in Europe - have at the 740 model only European maps. With the 940, I also have North American maps (VS + Canada).
The HD traffic works only in The Netherlands - as far as I know - but at this point it is ETREMELY accurate! That's why I bought a TomTom. Furthermore, I have also advanced positiontechnology (accelerator inside the device which also leads the way when you are in a tunnel!!).
So far, I like the solution very much. The graphics could be better but hey... It is navigation and traffic what counts, no??
rob @ Aug 7th 2009 8:16AM
Wow what a fair and balanced review.. Did TomTom kick your dog or something?
GPS devices from major vendors are very similar and perform about the same, while there are some specific issues or "features" that someone may or may not like about one or the other ..
SO if you have to resort to childish antics wait 24 hours and read it again ..