Latest in Gear

Image credit:

Ex-Uber employee fights for workers’ right to pursue class-action

She wants companies like Uber to stop requiring private arbitration.
Share
Tweet
Share

Sponsored Links

Martin Shields/Alamy

Susan Fowler, the ex-Uber engineer who called out the company's sexual harassment problem in a blog post earlier this year, has now focused her attention towards the Supreme Court. With her attorney, she has filed an amicus brief in support of workers involved in three consolidated cases that will be heard by the high court. The cases all center on whether companies like Uber should be able to stipulate that employees are barred from joining class-action lawsuits against the company and instead must pursue resolutions through private arbitration.

The brief notes that Fowler had to sign a class action waiver when she was hired by Uber and that these sorts of documents are common in the industry. "These waivers are now ubiquitous in the high tech industry and 'gig economy,' where the likelihood of unionization is remote," it said. It also notes that these are particularly harmful to workers saying, " Class action waivers take from these workers the concerted activity in which they are most likely to engage, and from which they are most likely to benefit: The right to engage in collective litigation."

The arguments Fowler and her attorney lay out highlight three major problems with these types of waivers. First, that they only exist to "eliminate the legal risk associated with systemic – and potentially or certainly illegal – employment practices." Secondly, taking away the right to pursue class action in the 21st century is detrimental to workers that often can't effectively fight for improved working conditions any other way. And finally, the brief points out that collective litigation when warranted is often successful in improving working conditions. "Without the right to collective litigation, there will be more systemic employment law violations, less effective ways to remedy them, and the balance between companies (i.e., capital) and talent (i.e., labor) will shift firmly in favor of capital," said the brief.

The three cases are scheduled to be heard by the Supreme Court on October 2nd.

All products recommended by Engadget are selected by our editorial team, independent of our parent company. Some of our stories include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, we may earn an affiliate commission.
Comment
Comments
Share
Tweet
Share

Popular on Engadget

California Uber drivers sue company over Prop 22 app notifications

California Uber drivers sue company over Prop 22 app notifications

View
'Uncharted' set photos offer our first look at Tom Holland as Nathan Drake

'Uncharted' set photos offer our first look at Tom Holland as Nathan Drake

View
The Apple TV app is coming to PS4 and PS5

The Apple TV app is coming to PS4 and PS5

View
Jabra's ANC update for the Elite 75t earbuds is now available

Jabra's ANC update for the Elite 75t earbuds is now available

View
Garmin's new smartwatch lets streamers show real-time heart rates

Garmin's new smartwatch lets streamers show real-time heart rates

View

From around the web

Page 1Page 1ear iconeye iconFill 23text filevr