NVIDIA takes its feud with Intel to cartoonish new levels
[Via ExtremeTech]
fight posts
At the tone, please record your message. When you have finished recording, you may hang up, or press 1 for more options. To leave a callback number, press 5. (Beep)Not only is Pogue mad-as-hell-and-not-going-to-take-it about the ridiculous idea that we still need to be told how to use voicemail, it turns out those additional messages are actually costing you cold, hard cash. He estimates that Verizon, for instance, is netting around $620 million a year thanks to these little annoyances. So what's to be done? Well Pogue wants the citizens of the internet to take up virtual arms... and complain like nobody's business. He's wrangled together all the best contact points for the four largest carriers in the US (included for your convenience after the break). Let them know you know don't want to pay for voicemail instructions. And hey, while you're at it, tell them the price-gouging on text messages needs to go, too.


You've got to love it, don't you? The prolonged hatefest between Intel and NVIDIA is continuing on today, with Andy Keane, general manager of the company's GPU computing group, delivering the latest blow. While speaking to reporters at the outfit's headquarters in Sunnyvale, California, he was quoted as saying that there is still "an incredible amount about Larrabee that's undefined." Furthermore, John Mottram chimed in by suggesting that "as [blogger and CPU architect] Peter Glaskowsky said, the 'large' Larrabee in 2010 will have roughly the same performance as a 2006 GPU from NVIDIA or ATI." We're beginning to wonder if these guys aren't just passing disses while sharing a cold one afterwards just to get attention, but being that it's more fun to envision suits from rival firms intensely angry with one another, we'll just keep believing this actually isn't a joke.
| ThinkPad X300 |
Envy 133 |
MacBook Air |
| 0.73 to 0.92-inches |
0.70-inches |
0.16 to 0.76-inches |
| 2.9 to 3.1-pounds* |
3.37-pounds | 3 pounds |
| 13.3-inch LED |
13.3-inch LED |
13.3-inch LED |
| 1,440 x 900 |
1,280 x 800 |
1,280 x 800 |
| Removable Battery |
Removable Battery | Not Removable |
| Ethernet | External | via USB adapter |
| 3x USB | 1x USB, 1x USB/eSATA | 1x USB |
| DVD | External | External |
| 1.2GHz Core 2 Duo | 1.8GHz Core 2 Duo | 1.8GHz Core 2 Duo |
| GMA X3100 | GMA X3100 | GMA X3100 |
| SSD only | HDD or SSD |
HDD or SSD |
| Vista | Vista | Vista or OS X |
| $2,700 to $3,000* | $2,099 starting | $1,800 to $3,100* |
| Business minded | Instant on Voodoo IOS | Cuts cake |


Don't etch this one in stone just yet, but for those keeping a close eye on studios and which camp(s) they support, here's the latest. Reportedly, a so-called Blu-ray Festival has been raging in Hollywood, and aside from BD backers showing up in support of upcoming / existing films, there have also been a few interesting remarks uttered along the way. Most notably, Dan Silverberg, VP of high-definition media for Warner Home Video, stated that "one thing that may be changing is [Warner's] strategy," and he continued by proclaiming that hardware prices had reached a point where consumers "no longer wanted to decide" which format reigned supreme. The speech actually got interesting when he mentioned that the "notion of staying in two formats for the duration is something the company was re-evaluating." Beyond that, egos were simply inflated even more as recent BD vs. HD DVD sales figures were trumpeted about, but we think the aforementioned commentary is far more interesting that hearing about numbers we're already familiar with.








