The NSA's very bad year
Former NSA contractor Edward Snowden took online privacy concerns to a whole new level when he leaked documents to The Guardian, proving the agency tapped into user data from Apple, Facebook, Google and others as part of its larger PRISM surveillance program. Companies initially denied knowledge of the NSA's activities, but Snowden's additional leaks showed that this was more than an isolated incident: The agency collected bulk call records from Verizon and other carriers thanks to a warrant from the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.
Further revelations revealed the UK government also used PRISM to gather data on internet companies; the NSA's spying covers as much as 75 percent of US online traffic; and custom software allows the government to sort collected data by country. Of course, this is only what we know so far.
Though President Barack Obama claimed that PRISM collected only metadata (rather than listening to your phone calls) and that internet monitoring pertains only to "those outside the United States," the leaks put both the government and internet companies on the defensive. Google petitioned the FISA court -- with no success -- for the ability to release aggregate numbers of government data requests, and a presidential task force is currently exploring an overhaul of the NSA program. In the meantime, sites are trying to appease reluctant users with transparency reports and additional file encryption. Oh, and Mr. Snowden remains one of America's most wanted during a one-year asylum in Russia, which he accomplished with the help of Julian Assange and the larger WikiLeaks team. -- Sarah Silbert
tl;dr The NSA has your number, and yours, and yours and yours, too.
Microsoft's mega-tough transition
Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson)
Microsoft's vision for itself and the road ahead is clear: It has designs on becoming a "devices and services" company. Steve Ballmer, Microsoft's outgoing CEO, has repeatedly said as much from the moment he announced his seemingly forced "retirement" in late August and throughout all the subsequent Nokia-acquisition news. The Redmond-based tech giant is in the midst of a difficult transition; one that Ballmer couldn't quite engineer. As it clamors for an ever-increasing slice of the mobile market -- a roughly 4 percent share it wants to quadruple -- and folds in much of Nokia to do so, the company's left to ponder just who will effectively lead that charge.
The Redmond-based tech giant is in the midst of a difficult transition; one that Ballmer couldn't quite engineer.
Though Microsoft's $7.35 billion purchase of Nokia's devices and services business -- patents and mapping tech will simply be licensed -- may seem to outsiders as if it's following Apple's vertical integration, that doesn't mean it's abandoning support for Windows Phone manufacturers. On the contrary, Microsoft believes it needs to create a halo Windows Phone product to drive adoption of the platform, which could in turn attract more manufacturer interest in the number three mobile OS. And let's not forget about Nokia's Asha line. Microsoft's already laid bare its intentions to reach "the next billion" in emerging markets and with Asha under its belt, it's positioned advantageously to do just that. Now it just needs a CEO to see it through.
Much of the press' speculation has focused on Stephen Elop, former Nokia CEO and future head of Microsoft's Device and Services division, as candidate numero uno for the role. And given its new slant toward a unified Windows platform and its push for a "first-rate Microsoft phone experience," the charismatic and able Elop does seem a fitting choice. But it's not a guaranteed coup, as other potential candidates have surfaced, most notably Ford CEO Alan Mulally and two internal picks: Enterprise head Satya Nadella and Skype's Tony Bates. Whoever the board finally decides upon, we know that a conclusion to this CEO succession saga is still a ways off, as the board's issued a vague "early part of 2014" target to conclude its search. Just don't be surprised if that date slips even further into the future. -- Joseph Volpe
tl;dr Ballmer's out; Nokia's in.
Wearables make a play for the mainstream
Google seemed to open the floodgates of consumer curiosity with the release of its first dev-focused version of Glass this April, and there was one question on everyone's lips: Is that thing recording? Of course, there were a number of other notable gadgets in the category and a number of other unanswered questions. Among them: Is the world ready for wearable computers? It's clear that manufacturers are, with Sony, Samsung and Pebble all offering their own takes on the smartwatch, a slew of new fitness trackers hitting the market and the promise of the Oculus Rift and similar headsets capturing the imagination of gamers everywhere. Even Apple's Tim Cook has his eye on the market, dubbing wearables "very interesting" in an interview with AllThingsD -- sounds familiar, right?
Despite the onslaught of head-mounted and wrist-friendly devices, it's still early days. Google has yet to release a consumer version of Glass; the much-rumored iWatch is still just that; and Oculus VR still hasn't committed to a release date. That's not to say we won't see head-mounted displays on every Tom, Dick and Harry in the coming years, or that mainstream interest in wearables doesn't exist, but most of the devices we've tried on are still dependent on the smartphones many of them aim to eliminate. The limitations don't stop there. Detractors have pointed to the actual wearability of most of today's wearables -- despite the fashion industry's fetishistic embrace -- and limited functionality has positioned them as playthings of the wealthy and truly nerdy. -- Christopher Trout
Deep Dive: Living with Glass; Gaming the system: Edward Thorp and the wearable computer that beat Vegas; Google Glass review; Oculus Rift: Follow the saga; Sony SmartWatch 2 review; Pebble smartwatch review; Samsung Galaxy Gear review
tl;dr Like it or not, the glassholes have arrived.
(Photo by George Frey/Getty Images)
In 2013, Bitcoin's value against the dollar skyrocketed, suddenly thrusting the nascent system into the spotlight. At the start of the year, one Bitcoin was worth around $20, but by the end of November, it was more than $1,000. The most famous names involved with the system are the Winklevoss twins, who have plowed a reported $11 million into Bitcoin in the hope of making a fortune when its value rises even higher. With the advent of Bitcoin ATMs, people can even walk in off the street and swap their cash for the digital money.
Before it went mainstream, however, Bitcoin had a reputation for being used by the more nefarious of internet citizens. Unregulated, difficult to trace and without a central bank to keep things in check, it's very easy to buy and sell goods without interference, which explains why it was the currency of choice for the now-defunct online black market, Silk Road. With increased notoriety comes the interest of governments, and when Fed chief Ben Bernanke says that Bitcoin may have "long-term promise," it seems as if regulation isn't far behind. Recently, China moved to block people from buying Bitcoins with yuan in an attempt to control the nation's planned economy -- causing the currency's values to plummet from a high of more than $1,000 to less than $500 in the course of a few days.
At the start of the year, one Bitcoin was worth around $20, but by the end of November, it was more than $1,000.
Bitcoin differs from regular currencies in two ways. Firstly, there's a total limit on the number of coins that can be created through "mining," and secondly, if a coin is destroyed, there's no way to get it back, forever reducing the total liquidity of the Bitcoin economy. Now, while dropping a few coins down a drain won't cause you to go bankrupt, feel sorry for Briton James Howells, an early Bitcoin adopter who accidentally threw out the hard drive that contained his coinage. By the time he realized his mistake, around $8 million worth of BTC was crushed at the bottom of a Welsh trash heap.
While 2013 saw Bitcoin make headlines, 2014 will determine whether or not it's a flash in the pan. Not only does it need to fend off the threat of rival currencies, but it also has to deal with the pressures of maturing into a stable and useful currency as both profiteers and governments begin to pull the system in two very different directions. Whatever happens, money will never be the same again. -- Daniel Cooper
Deep Dive: Primed: The rise (and rise?) of Bitcoin
tl;dr The digital currency captured hearts, minds and the Winklevoss twins.
Cracking the Carrier Model
This year marked the beginning of the end for carrier subsidy models in the US, and it all started with "Crazy Eddie" himself, T-Mobile CEO John Legere. Until 2013, the carriers remained steadfastly committed to the traditional subsidy-pricing model in which you get a discount on the phone when you agree to a multi-year contract. T-Mobile, however, made a few key changes to its plans: You can now pay off your phone in monthly increments and the carrier lets you upgrade to a new phone much sooner. The "UnCarrier" strategy (as the company calls it) became quite popular, and the result was infectious -- before the end of the year, the other three national networks had come up with similar plans. Unlike T-Mobile, though, its competitors chose to offer that option alongside the traditional postpaid plans. A win for consumers who like choice, we suppose.
What's more, carriers like T-Mobile and AT&T now promise discounts on monthly service when you're either out of contract or you've paid off your device. This is fantastic news for anyone who'd rather procure their phone or tablet from outlets outside of carrier stores. Additionally, there are so many more unlocked devices sold at affordable prices now: The Nexus 5 delivers flagship phone features for a mere $350, while the Moto G offers tempting value for $179, and the Nokia Lumia 520 proves that cheap Windows Phones can still be solid performers. All of these, as well as new Firefox OS phones, low-cost Asha devices and others, are setting the stage for what should be some intense competition in 2014 for emerging markets like China and India. -- Brad Molen
tl;dr You can hate the phone company a little bit less now.
PlayStation 4 vs. Xbox One and the year Valve Attacked
At this time last year, Microsoft's Xbox One and Sony's PlayStation 4 were still "Durango" and "Orbis," respectively. Nintendo's Wii U was still in the spotlight -- even selling well in early reports -- and Valve had yet to officially unveil its "Steambox" at CES 2013. This year was transformative and evolutionary for gaming, with not just new consoles from entrenched players, but also major moves from players across the spectrum: Valve, Oculus VR, NVIDIA, Razer, OUYA and myriad others.
In January, we called 2013 "The Year That Valve Attacks." That turned out to be truer than we expected. With the exception of Android gaming consoles, every other major volley in 2013 came with at least a dash of Valve's handiwork. From NVIDIA Shield's streaming tech playing nice with Steam, to Oculus VR's direct work with Valve and the Steam Machines/Controller hardware initiative, this year marks more than an attack by the Bellevue, Wash.-based game company -- it's the beginning of a new era for PC gaming altogether.
Of course, next-gen console coverage consumed much of our time this year. The two boxes are out now and we've reviewed each -- spoilers: Both the Xbox One and PlayStation 4 are pretty OK! -- but let's not forget all the ballyhoo leading up to their November launches. There's the obvious (Microsoft's DRM debacle, Sony's YouTube cheek), the unfortunate (Watch Dogs delayed, late releases in Asia, $500?!) and the downright nasty (both consoles are paperweights before major day one updates).
We'll assuredly see even more balkanization of gaming in 2014. Apple and Google have yet to really go after traditional gaming. Oculus VR's retail headset is on the way, and Avegant's competition isn't far off either. Heck, in just over a week, we'll see what Valve's bringing to market with help from third-party PC makers in Steam Machines. Like late December 2012, we don't have a perfectly clear view of the year ahead. What we can see, however, is more exciting than ever. -- Ben Gilbert
Deep Dive: 2013: The Year Valve Attacks; Xbox One vs. the PlayStation 4: A battle over services, not chips; Xbox One Review; PlayStation 4 review; How the internet ruined game consoles
tl;dr It's all about the consoles, except when it's not.
Netflix is the new black
It's easy to find Netflix's low point: that mid-2011 decision to go all-in on streaming, and spin off discs-by-mail as its own business under the Qwikster brand. After a sudden drop in subscribers, however, things are looking up and 2013 will be remembered as the year Netflix cemented its place as a major industry player. Outbidding several traditional TV networks for House of Cards gave it the centerpiece for a lineup of original programming that changed its reputation. It's hard to imagine anyone calling Netflix -- the home of several series up for prestigious Primetime Emmy awards -- "rerun TV" anymore.
It's hard to imagine anyone calling Netflix -- the home of several series up for prestigious primetime Emmy awards -- "rerun TV" anymore.
Viewer demand for Netflix has led to partnerships with several pay-TV services in Europe for placement alongside traditional channels. There are rumors that Netflix is pursuing similar deals in the US, as it chases the revenue stream of entrenched competitors like Time Warner's HBO. This year, Netflix passed HBO in customer count, and a second go-round for series like HoC and Orange is the New Black will be taken as seriously as anything cable channels produce. On the flipside, former video-rental king Blockbuster has trailed in its transition to the internet and announced in November that it's closing most of its remaining retail locations.
Netflix's subscriber base has made it a must-have for anyone launching a device that plugs into your TV -- even new consoles from Microsoft, Sony and Nintendo. Now it's using this industry clout to push a new DIAL protocol that makes streaming video on TV as easy as launching its app on your phone or tablet. Next year, its slate of original programming will include shows tied to the Wachowskis and Marvel superheroes, while in Europe, it will be the first place to watch the new Breaking Bad spin-off. Amazon and Hulu are gearing up to provide some competition with new original shows of their own, but as Netflix expands into comedy and documentaries, its lead is only getting bigger. With more than 40 million paying customers, in-demand content and a reach that spans across countries, the question for 2014 is if Netflix will go from complementing existing channels to completely replacing them for a larger number of its viewers. -- Richard Lawler
tl;dr Qwikster who?
BlackBerry's last gasp
Thorsten Heins, president and CEO of Research In Motion (AP Photo/Reinhold Matay)
For BlackBerry, 2013 was supposed to be a turnaround year. It was finally going to make smartphones that could compete with the best from other mobile platforms. Unfortunately, the past 12 months have been anything but pleasant for the folks in Waterloo. BlackBerry 10's inaugural devices, the Z10, Z30, Q5 and Q10, weren't popular enough to stem the tide of customers jumping to rival products. The firm wrote off billions of dollars in unsold BB10 devices, and its quarterly shipments dwindled from 6.9 million a year ago to 1.9 million in its most recently concluded quarter. In its heyday, BlackBerry had a fifth of the market and fended off powerhouses like Apple and Google; it's now left fighting for survival in niche markets.
Poor sales only served to fuel the corporate drama that began in 2012. Executive departures and layoffs were all too common at BlackBerry in 2013, and the once fiercely independent company spent months courting potential buyers. Even that didn't go smoothly, however. The phone maker ultimately settled for selling itself to its largest shareholder, only to lose the deal weeks later. Thorsten Heins' ouster in the wake of that failure was less of a tragedy and more of an inevitability. He had come to the CEO position in early 2012 to streamline the company and keep pace with nimbler rivals, but he was ineffective in reversing the firm's decline.
Still, there is some hope left for the one-time mobile giant. New CEO John Chen is taking a different tack than his predecessor: He has a long-term plan to restore profitability, and he's focused on growing the company rather than slimming it down. A decision to hire two key executives in December was a welcome relief from the mass exodus of the past two years. BlackBerry remains on extremely shaky ground at the end of 2013, and Chen may serve as little more than a crisis manager trying to make the best of a very bad situation. Still, he's the first outsider to take the helm in nearly 30 years and he may represent the sort of fresh thinking that BlackBerry needs. -- Jon Fingas
Deep Dive: Back to BlackBerry; RIM: A brief history from Budgie to BlackBerry 10; Cracking up: A brief history of BlackBerry's fall from smartphone dominance
tl;dr And BlackBerry still can't get it right.
Rethinking the Troll Toll
Odds are, you'll have to pay the troll toll if you have anything to do with consumer electronics these days. Which is why we're closing out 2013 with another round of patent reform winding its way up Capitol Hill. This time around, the Innovation Act, which already has the House of Representatives' stamp of approval, aims to change the legal rules governing patent lawsuits to discourage trolls from filing them.
Under the current laws, trolls can file suit against small businesses and end users who simply sell or use products that allegedly infringe, as opposed to the company that manufactured them. Additionally, trolls don't currently have to specify exactly how a company has infringed their patents -- which makes it easier to accuse folks of infringement. The Innovation Act would let manufacturers stand in for end users and retailers in court, require trolls to specify how their patents are being infringed, reduce the costs of discovery and force those who file suit and lose to pay for the legal costs of those they accused.
In 2011, Obama signed the America Invents Act in an attempt to improve the US patent system and curb the number of patent suits clogging court dockets (and, consequently, Engadget's pages). It did not have the desired effect. The two years since have seen more patent lawsuits filed than ever, and a disproportionate number of such cases -- 62 percent of those filed in 2012 -- involve patent assertion entities, aka patent trolls. So, here we are, waiting to see if this new round of reforms can have the desired effect and reduce that number.
Of course, it's not just the quantity of patent lawsuits that's the problem. There's also the matter of quality -- patents being granted when, maybe, they shouldn't be. A troll without valid patents can't cause any courtroom trouble, after all. The patentability of software has long been at issue both in the tech world and the legal world. And, late this year, the Supreme Court finally decided to weigh in on the issue when it agreed to review a case about patentability of software. Suffice to say, we won't know whether lines of code should persist within the purview of patent law by the time Baby New Year shows up, but we should get our answer at some point in 2014. -- Michael Gorman
tl;dr Patent trolls a dying breed?
Capturing Higgs boson
The decades-long search for the Higgs boson came, more or less, to a happy ending in 2013 when Peter Higgs and Francois Englert were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics "for the theoretical discovery of a mechanism that contributes to our understanding of the origin of mass of subatomic particles." While a preliminary announcement came in the summer of 2012, it wasn't until several months later, in March of this year, that CERN was finally confident enough to declare the new elementary particle it had discovered was indeed the Higgs.
To call the discovery monumental would be an understatement. Scientists didn't simply identify a new fundamental chunk of matter. The existence of the Higgs boson would seem to confirm the existence of the Higgs field, an important aspect of the Standard Model of particle physics. It would also explain why some elementary particles have mass -- through interaction with the field -- when other evidence suggests they should be massless. Initial reports held that the Higgs was "exotic" beyond scientists' expectations, but further analysis showed that it was actually quite mundane -- for a boson, anyway.
There's still much, much more work to be done. Study of the Higgs boson and field could lend insight into cosmic expansion, and has implications for the so-called cosmological constant problem. The cosmological constant is, for those that don't know, a mysterious force that Albert Einstein suggested counteracted gravity, which he eventually abandoned, calling it his "greatest blunder." The idea has since been resurrected following the discovery that our universe is not just expanding, but also accelerating. And, of course, there are the countless researchers out there now looking for a practical application for the discovery. All of this work will need even more powerful tools, however, and so CERN shutdown the Large Hadron Collider and its many multi-story detectors to give them a healthy upgrade. (Though, its PR department is still plenty active.) -- Terrence O'Brien
Deep Dive: Primed: The smashing science behind particle accelerators; Into the heart of CERN
tl;dr Physics, y'all!
Illustration by Greg Grabowy. Photos: Steve Ballmer (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson); Bitcoins (George Frey/Getty Images); Edward Snowden (AP Photo/The Guardian, Glenn Greenwald and Laura Poitras); Higgs Boson (CERN)